Arachnomimus maindroni ( Chopard, 1969 ) Chopard, 1969
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.209049 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6167215 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA713859-D269-DE65-FF73-89F3FB89FADE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Arachnomimus maindroni ( Chopard, 1969 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Arachnomimus maindroni ( Chopard, 1969) , n. comb.
( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 G–I, 2)
Kempiola maindroni Chopard, 1969: 254 .
Type locality. India, Coromandel coast, Gangi.
Type material. Holotype: 1 female, India, Coromandel, Gangi, 1901 (M. Maindron) (MNHN-ENSIF2955) (palpi, PI and right PII missing).
Diagnosis. Large species ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A) characterized by the colouration of its face ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 C), pronotum ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 D, E) and FIII ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 H), ovipositor length (15 mm) and shape of copulatory papilla (long, socket-like, with a distinctly bifid dorsal sclerotization, Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 G, H). Subgenital and supra anal plates as on Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 F, G. TIII apical spurs as on Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 I (inner side) and 1J (outer side, here in Arachnomimus nietneri ). Measurements, see Chopard 1969 (p. 254).
Remark. Originally described by Chopard in the genus Kempiola , this species differs from K. longipes by its very distinctive copulatory papilla, identical to that of other Arachnomimus species. The other distinctive characters of this last genus (lack of tympanum, male genitalia) cannot be checked with the specimen at hand, but the female genitalia are so characteristic of the genus that generic identity is clear.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Arachnomimus maindroni ( Chopard, 1969 )
Desutter-Grandcolas, Laure & Jaiswara, Ranjana 2012 |
Kempiola maindroni
Chopard 1969: 254 |