Austrothurgus cognatus (Smith) Gonzalez & Engel & Griswold, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.17161/jom.v0i11.4520 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F8D5EC99-DB33-4628-B175-94D57B7FF550 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13228729 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/697F87FD-FF9A-FFE9-FE9B-FEB657E97CFA |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Austrothurgus cognatus (Smith) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Austrothurgus cognatus (Smith) View in CoL , new combination
( Figs. 6–10 View Figures 6–10 )
Lithurgus cognatus Smith, 1868: 255 View in CoL . Lectotype (new designation): NHML No. 17.a.2099; ♀, Champion Bay (Geraldton), Western Australia, Australia.
DIAGNOSIS: The female of this species is similar to that of A. rubricatus in the sternal scopa and fifth and sixth terga with distal margins entirely covered with yellowish to light reddish brown setae ( Fig. 6 View Figures 6–10 ). It can be distinguished from that species by the following combination of characters: large bees (head width 4.8‒5.1 mm, body length 16‒17 mm); clypeus smooth, shiny, distinctly swollen laterally along epistomal sulcus ( Figs. 6–8 View Figures 6–10 ); vertex with large impunctate areas ( Fig. 9 View Figures 6–10 ); facial prominence with deep median emargination, appearing bilobed in dorsal view, projecting about 0.7 times width of compound eye in profile ( Figs. 6–8 View Figures 6–10 ); and mesoscutum and mesoscutellum smooth and shiny, with distinct transverse, irregular rugulae. The male also resembles that of A. rubricatus in the distal terga with light reddish brown setae on their discs contrasting with the remaining terga covered by dark brown to black setae. However, in A. cognatus the metabasitarsal carina is long, about as long as the distance from its superior margin to the base of the metabasitarsus ( Fig. 10 View Figures 6–10 ), whereas in A. rubricatus the metabasitarsal carina is much shorter than the distance between its superior margin and the base of the metabasitarsus ( Fig. 5 View Figures 1–5 ).
COMMENTS: This species was described based on both sexes. The female is more distinctive than the male and herein is designated as lectotype to stabilize the name. The label data for this specimen are as follow: Type // BM. TYPE HYM. 17.a.2099// Lithurgus cognatus Smith [handwritten, blue label] // W. Australia // Lectotype, Lithurgus cognatus Smith des. V.H. Gonzalez, M.S. Engel & T. Griswold ♀.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Austrothurgus cognatus (Smith)
Gonzalez, Victor H., Engel, Michael S. & Griswold, Terry L. 2013 |
Lithurgus cognatus
Smith, F. 1868: 255 |