Belisana muruo Yao & Li, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4802.1.7 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:46448DF5-3090-4A4C-9893-F6E68DB8636C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10564338 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D2364E-FFD6-7C4C-CCEB-F9A1FEAFFB46 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Belisana muruo Yao & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Belisana muruo Yao & Li View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 5–6 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 , 11 View FIGURE 11 C–D
Type material. Holotype: Male ( IZCAS Ar39801), Unnamed cave (28°47 ꞌ 17.99 ꞌꞌ N, 98°31 ꞌ 04.98 ꞌꞌ E, elevation 3427 m), 8 km east of Da Zhengtong , Muruo Village , Zhuwagen Town, Zayu County, Tibet, China, 6 September 2014, J. Liu leg. Paratypes: 2 males ( IZCAS Ar39802–39803) and 4 females ( IZCAS Ar39804–39807), same data as holotype .
Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality and is a noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. This species resembles B. mainling Zhang, Zhu & Song, 2006 (see Zhang et al. 2006: 203, figs 32–40) with similar bulbal apophyses ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ) and vulval pore plates ( Figs 6B View FIGURE 6 , 11D View FIGURE 11 ), but can be distinguished by presence of large subdisto-prolateral sclerite (arrow in Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ) and retrolateral membranous flap (arrow f in Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ) on procursus. Unlike B. mainling male cheliceral distal apophyses face each other mesially (arrow da in Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ), and epigynal pockets are more separated (arrow ep in Figs 6B View FIGURE 6 , 11D View FIGURE 11 ).
Description. Male (holotype, IZCAS Ar39801): Total length 2.13 (2.19 with clypeus), carapace 0.94 long, 0.78 wide, opisthosoma 1.19 long, 1.25 wide. Leg I: 7.41 (1.94 + 0.31 + 2.06 + 2.44 + 0.66), leg II: 5.54 (1.44 + 0.19 + 1.41 + 2.34 + 0.16), leg III: 3.23 (0.78 + 0.13 + 0.88 + 1.25 + 0.19), leg IV: 4.18 (1.31 + 0.19 + 1.03 + 1.34 + 0.31); tibia I L/d: 36. Habitus as in Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 E–F. Carapace pale, with pair of large brown marks; ocular area with brown stripe medially; sternum pale, without marks. Legs pale, without darker rings. Opisthosoma grey, with black spots dorsally and laterally. Distance PME-PME 0.10, diameter PME 0.07, distance PME-ALE 0.04, AME absent. Ocular area barely elevated. Thoracic furrow absent. Clypeus unmodified. Sternum slightly longer than wide (0.63/0.53). Chelicerae ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ) with pair of small proximo-lateral apophyses and pair of short, pointed distal apophyses each with hardened and pointed tip (distance between tips: 0.14). Pedipalps as in Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 A–B; coxa unmodified; trochanter with short ventral apophysis provided with large retrolateral apophysis (arrow in Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ); femur with indistinct proximo-dorsal apophysis (arrow in Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ); procursus ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 A–D) simple proximally and complex distally, with large subdisto-prolateral sclerite (arrow in Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ), long, curved distal spine and retrolateral membranous flap (arrow f in Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ); bulb ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ) with hooked apophysis and simple embolus. Retrolateral trichobothria of tibia I at 17% proximally; legs with short vertical setae on tibiae, without spines or curved setae; tarsus I with 21 distinct pseudosegments.
Female (IZCAS Ar39804): Similar to male, habitus as in Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 G–H. Total length 2.06 (2.19 with clypeus), carapace 0.88 long, 0.63 wide, opisthosoma 1.18 long, 1.09 wide. Tibia I: 2.66; tibia I L/d: 27. Distance PME-PME 0.10, diameter PME 0.06, distance PME-ALE 0.04, AME absent. Sternum slightly longer than wide (0.63/0.56). External female genitalia ( Figs 6A View FIGURE 6 , 11C View FIGURE 11 ) simple and flat, with pair of indistinct pockets 0.18 apart (ep in Figs 6B View FIGURE 6 , 11D View FIGURE 11 ). Vulva ( Figs 6B View FIGURE 6 , 11D View FIGURE 11 ) with wavy anterior arch and pair of elliptic pore plates.
Variation: Tibia I in one male paratype ( IZCAS Ar39802; leg I missing in another male paratype IZCAS Ar39803): 2.56. Tibia I in two female paratypes ( IZCAS Ar39805–39806; leg I missing in the other female paratype IZCAS Ar39807): 1.92, 2.56 .
Natural history. The species was found in the aphotic zone inside the cave.
Distribution. China (Tibet, type locality only; Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ).
Remarks. This new species was found within cavities of rock walls inside the cave, while the other species in this paper were found on the underside of rocks in epigean environments. In contrast with these other longlegged species, this new species has remarkably short legs. This discrepancy probably reflects adaptation to different microhabitats.
IZCAS |
Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.