Bicellaria femorata Collin
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3710.3.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:01371F00-34CB-40F5-957E-A13852150B2F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6161770 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687E7-9054-E429-58A9-FB6EFD2ADF37 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bicellaria femorata Collin |
status |
|
Bicellaria femorata Collin View in CoL
( Figs 7, 8 View FIGURES 1 – 8 )
Bicellaria femorata Collin, 1960: 392 .
Identification of syntypes. Bicellaria femorata was described from five specimens: “a male labelled “Jerusalem [=Yerushalayim], O. Theodor”, and a female “Ginegar, Gallilee, 10.xi. [sic!]34. O. Theodor”. Also two females from “B. Alta [= Bet Alfa], 16.i.40, Dr. A. Shulov”, and one from “Judean Hills, 1.ii.31. O. Theodore” [sic!]”. All the above specimens are present in TAU: 1 male labelled “Jerusalem Palestine [=Yerushalayim] O. Theodor / COM. INST. ENT. COLL. No. 12611 / ♂ TYPE / B. femorata det. Coll. 58”, 1 female labelled “G 10 1 / Ginegar Galilee Palestine O. Theodor 10.ii.34 / COM. INST. ENT. COLL. No. 12611 / B. femorata det. Coll. 58”, 1 female labelled “B. Alfa 16.i.40 / 135 / Palestine Dr. A. Shulov / B. femorata det. Coll. 56 / Bicellaria femorata n. sp. ”, 1 female labelled “B. Alfa [=Bet Alfa] 16.i.40 / 133 / Palestine Dr. A. Shulov / B. femorata det. Coll. 56”, and one female labelled “BK VIII 34 / Kir. Anavim [=Qiryat 'Anavim] Judean Hills Palestine O. Theodor 1.2.31 / COM. INST. ENT. COLL. No. 12611 / ♀ TYPE / B. femorata det. Coll. 58”. We consider all above mentioned specimens syntypes in spite of small difference in date of the female from Ginegar and they were provided by red labels “ Syntype Bicellaria femorata rev. Barták 2013”. Moreover, in TAU there are another two specimens collected before 1960: 1 female without locality labelled “ 11.i.22 / 5.i.22 / 212” and another female labelled “C J VIII 30 / Jerusalem Palestine [=Yerushalayim] O. Theodor 5.i.36 ” and another 5 females labelled “Jerusalem Palestine [=Yerushalayim] O. Theodor” which were probably also collected before 1960. These are neither provided with circular handwritten Collin´s identification labels nor listed in the original description. For this reason we identified and labelled as syntypes of both Collin´s species ( B. femorata and B. spuria ingrata ) only specimens provided by the above mentioned circular label (see also under B. ingrata ).
Diagnosis. The species has unique combination of several features: palpus with many setae, halter yellow, mesoscutum with stripes, hind femur spinose, male phallic hooks curiously shaped ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). It may be easily identified according to the key.
Additional material examined (13♂, 34♀). Israel: 2♂, 9♀, 2 exx, Horvat Nappah, 10.xii.1973, A. Freidberg—( TAU); 3♀, same data—(CULSP); 5♂, 8♀, same locality, 20.xii.1973, A. Freidberg—( TAU); 2♂, same data—(CULSP); 1♂, 1♀, same locality, 1.i.1974, A. Freidberg; 1♂, Upper part of Nahal Tirza, 20.ii.1974, A. Freidberg; 1♂, Kesalon, 10.ii.1973, M. Kaplan; 1♀, Shelomi, 8.i.1975, F. Kaplan; 1♀, Rosh ha'Ayin, 31.xii.1986, Y. Nussbaum—( TAU); 1♂, same data—(CULSP); 1♀, Nahal 'Ammud, 23.ii.1983, I. Yarom; 1♀, 'Ofra, 29.i.1987; 1♀, Nahal Rabba, 20.xii.1981; 1♀, sine loc. (“212” and “ 11.i.22 ” and “ 5.i.22 ”); 6♀, Jerusalem, Palestine—( TAU); 1♀, Carmel, 14.ii.1976, A. Freidberg—(CULSP).
Distribution. Israel.
Remarks. This species was described in full detail by Collin (1960). Bicellaria femorata is included in the B. austriaca -complex of species as defined by Chvála (1991), but differs in having a pale halter, long setose hypandrium and swollen and spinose hind femur.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |