Bombus alpinus (Linnaeus)

Williams, Paul H., Berezin, Mikhail V., Cannings, Sydney G., Cederberg, Björn, Ødegaard, Frode, Rasmussen, Claus, Richardson, Leif L., Rykken, Jessica, Sheffield, Cory S., Thanoosing, Chawatat & Byvaltsev, Alexandr M., 2019, The arctic and alpine bumblebees of the subgenus Alpinobombus revised from integrative assessment of species’ gene coalescents and morphology (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus), Zootaxa 4625 (1), pp. 1-68 : 23

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4625.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D08DD464-F1AD-4253-888C-65A2A293F517

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC4D691F-FFB2-5E16-FF68-5FF47141F976

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Bombus alpinus (Linnaeus)
status

 

1. Bombus alpinus (Linnaeus) View in CoL

( Figs. 1 View FIGURES 1‒6 , 15‒21 View FIGURES 15‒21 , 129 View FIGURES 129‒137 )

< APIS View in CoL > alpina Linnaeus 1758:579 View in CoL , type-locality citation ‘Lapponiae alpibus ’. Neotype queen by designation of Løken 1963:187, ZIL not seen (identity not in doubt), ‘Lule Lappmark’ (Norrbotten, Sweden).

Bombus rufescens Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau [1835] View in CoL :460, type-locality citation ‘Forêt de Saint-Germain-en-Laye’. Holotype female by monotypy, not seen. Note 1. Synonymised with Bombus alpinus (Linnaeus) View in CoL by von Dalla Torre 1896:509.

Bombus Helleri von Dalla Torre 1882:16 View in CoL , type-locality citation ‘alpine’ (probably Tyrol, Austra). Syntypes not seen (identity not in doubt). Synonymised with Bombus alpinus (Linnaeus) View in CoL by von Dalla Torre 1896:509).

< Bombus helleri> var. collaris von Dalla Torre 1882:16 View in CoL (not of Scopoli 1763:306, = B. pratorum (Linnaeus)) View in CoL , type-locality citation ‘alpine’ (probably Tyrol, Austra). Syntype female and male, not seen (identity not in doubt). Considered conspecific with Bombus alpinus (Linnaeus) View in CoL by von Dalla Torre 1896:509.

[B.<ombus> alpinus alpinus View in CoL m. alpinus View in CoL f. scutellaris Pittioni 1942:216, infrasubspecific.]

Note 1 ( rufescens ). The type-locality citation appears false because it refers to a location on the western edge of Paris, where this species is very unlikely to have occurred. The explanation is not pursued further here because it is unlikely to affect the valid name for this or any other Alpinobombus species.

Taxonomy and variation. A species coalescent in the COI gene ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) and divergence in the PEPCK gene characterising B. alpinus have been demonstrated by Williams et al. (2015). Morphometric differences between B. alpinus and B. pyrrhopygus (as B. polaris ) have been demonstrated graphically by Løken (1973) and Pekkarinen (1979).

Variation in colour pattern is primarily in the extent of yellow hairs on the dorsum of the thorax. Extensive yellow hair is rare in females ( Fig. 16 View FIGURES 15‒21 ) but more frequent in males ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 15‒21 ).

Variation in COI sequences between the samples from the Alps and samples from Scandinavia shows divergence at only one base position ( Figs. 9 View FIGURE 9 , 14 View FIGURE 14 ).

Material examined. 15 queens 54 workers 19 males (plus 28 females with caste undetermined), from France, Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Romania, Norway, Sweden, and Russia ( Fig. 15 View FIGURES 15‒21 : FO INHS NHMUK PW ZISP), with 15 specimens barcoded.

Habitat and distribution. Flower-rich arctic/alpine tundra in the Old World from the far north of Scandinavia, east only to the Kola Peninsula, extending southwards into the subarctic region in the alpine zone of the southern Scandinavian mountains, as well as disjunctly in the alpine zone into the temperate region of the Alps and western Carpathian mountains. Regional distribution maps ( Skorikov 1931; Pittioni 1942; Løken 1973; Pekkarinen et al. 1981; Rasmont & Iserbyt 2012; Cederberg et al. 2013a; Ødegaard et al. 2015; Rasmont et al. 2015).

Food plants. ( Richards 1931; Løken 1973; Mossberg & Cederberg 2012)

Behaviour. ( Løken 1973; Svensson & Lundberg 1977)

Conservation status. This species has been assessed for Red List threat status using IUCN criteria (2001). Cederberg et al. (2013a) assessed the Red List status of this species as ‘Vulnerable’ because its known area of occupancy (AOO) is small (1,288 km ²) and because it is experiencing a continuing decline due to climate warming. Subsequently, Rasmont et al. (2015) have assessed the risk from climate change to this species as ‘very high climate change risk’ (HHR), projecting that it will be on the verge of extinction by the year 2100.

INHS

Illinois Natural History Survey

NHMUK

Natural History Museum, London

PW

Paleontological Collections

ZISP

Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Apidae

Genus

Bombus

SubGenus

Bombus

Loc

Bombus alpinus (Linnaeus)

Williams, Paul H., Berezin, Mikhail V., Cannings, Sydney G., Cederberg, Björn, Ødegaard, Frode, Rasmussen, Claus, Richardson, Leif L., Rykken, Jessica, Sheffield, Cory S., Thanoosing, Chawatat & Byvaltsev, Alexandr M. 2019
2019
Loc

Bombus rufescens

Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, A. L. M. 1835: 460
1835
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF