Buddleja coroicense Rusby (1907: 412)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.234.3.4 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B52527-FF94-FF86-5BB2-FEFF9E49FBAC |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Buddleja coroicense Rusby (1907: 412) |
| status |
|
Buddleja coroicense Rusby (1907: 412) View in CoL
Type (lectotype, first-step designated by Norman 2000: 122):— BOLIVIA. La Paz: Coroico , Jul. 1894, A. M. Bang 2327 ( NY!, three sheets; second-step lectotype, here designated NY barcode 0297530! [digital image], isolectotypes BM barcode 600449! [digital image], CORD barcode 3655! [digital image], CORD barcode 3656! [digital image], E barcode 259276! [digital image], F barcode 062093 F! [digital image], G barcode 00236345! [digital image], GH barcode 75691! [digital image], K barcode 573226! [digital image], LIL barcode 1099! [digital image], M barcode 183825! [digital image], MICH barcode 1115853! [digital image], PH barcode 010895! [digital image], NY barcode 0297531! [digital image], NY barcode 0297532! [digital image], PUL barcode 314! [digital image], US barcode 113029! [digital image], US barcode 930972! [digital image], WIS barcode 256011 WIS! [digital image]) .
Notes:—Rusby mentioned three gatherings in the protologue: Bang 2327, Pearce and Mandon 347. Although he states that the Pearce collection was “less tomentose” and the Mandon collection “might be the same”, the author did not specify which of the three specimens should be regarded as the type. Therefore these are considered syntypes and a lectotype is to be selected according to Art. 9.5 of the ICN ( McNeill et al. 2012). Norman (2000: 122) indicated Bang 2327 collection in NY as the holotype, but it is an error to be corrected to lectotype (Art. 9.9 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). In NY herbarium, actually, three duplicate specimens exist ( NY 0297530, NY 0297531, NY 0297532), so that Norman’s mention can be considered as a first-step typification (Art. 9.17, Ex. 12 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). This designation is here narrowed by selecting the specimen annotated by Norman as “ holotype ” as a second-step lectotype (Art. 9.17 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012, McNeill 2014).
Current status:—heterotypic synonym of Buddleja diffusa Ruiz & Pavón (1798: 53) .
B 4. Taxa described by other botanists
| A |
Harvard University - Arnold Arboretum |
| M |
Botanische Staatssammlung München |
| NY |
William and Lynda Steere Herbarium of the New York Botanical Garden |
| BM |
Bristol Museum |
| CORD |
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba |
| E |
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh |
| F |
Field Museum of Natural History, Botany Department |
| G |
Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève |
| GH |
Harvard University - Gray Herbarium |
| K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
| LIL |
Fundación Miguel Lillo |
| MICH |
University of Michigan |
| PUL |
Purdue University |
| WIS |
University of Wisconsin |
| ICN |
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural |
| B |
Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Zentraleinrichtung der Freien Universitaet |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Buddleja coroicense Rusby (1907: 412)
| O’Leary, Nataly 2015 |
Buddleja coroicense
| Rusby, H. H. 1907: ) |