Buddleja similis Fries (1907: 27)

O’Leary, Nataly, 2015, Typification and nomenclatural notes on twenty-three names of Buddleja (Schrophulariaceae), Phytotaxa 234 (3), pp. 237-245 : 240

Buddleja similis Fries (1907: 27)

Type (lectotype, first-step designated by Norman 2000: 118):— ARGENTINA. Jujuy: Arroyo del Medio, loco aprico, R. E. Fries 353 ( S!, two sheets; second-step lectotype, here designated S No. 09-43643! [digital image], isolectotypes P barcode 0641157! [digital image], S-R- No. 771! [digital image]) .

Notes:— Norman (2000) “clearly indicated the type element” (Art. 7.10, before 2001) as to be the collection in S as the “ holotype ”, but it is an error to be corrected to lectotype (Art. 9.9 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). In S herbarium, actually, two duplicate specimens exist ( S 09-43643 and S-R-771), so that Norman’s mention can be considered as a first-step typification (Art. 9.17, Ex. 12 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012). This designation is here narrowed by selecting the most complete specimen as a second-step lectotype (Art. 9.17 of the ICN, McNeill et al. 2012, McNeill 2014).

Current status:—heterotypic synonym of Buddleja iresinoides ( Grisebach 1879: 278) Hosseus (1926: 45) .

B 2. Species described by Friedrich Kraenzlin

Kraenzlin’s type material was mostly housed at B ( Stafleu & Cowan 1979), and therefore the holotypes of the following taxa were all probably destroyed during WWII, except for the collections of Malme, which are housed at S. In most of the following cases Norman (2000) mentions the “ holotype ” to be a fragment, housed at F, removed from the destroyed type from B. According to Art. 9.9 of the ICN ( McNeill et al. 2012) Norman’s use of holotype is an error to be corrected to lectotype.