Chilicola (Chilicola) aisenensis Toro and Moldenke

Gibbs, Jason & Packer, Laurence, 2006, Revision and phylogenetic analysis of Chilicola sensu stricto (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) with the description of a new species, Zootaxa 1355, pp. 1-37 : 10-11

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.174590

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6262283

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AB87B4-FFB0-FFDA-3F56-FB8AFC15F8DB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Chilicola (Chilicola) aisenensis Toro and Moldenke
status

 

Chilicola (Chilicola) aisenensis Toro and Moldenke View in CoL

Chilicola (Chilicola) aisenensis Toro and Moldenke, 1979 View in CoL . An. Mus. Hist. Nat. Valparaíso 12:102. Male

Diagnosis: C. aisenensis males have a clypeus with an inverted T-shape mark similar to that of C. rubriventris ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 A – G ). The hind tibia of C. aisenensis has the expanded ventral margin, preapical concavity, and apical transverse lamina common to most other members of the subgenus. The hind tibia can be differentiated from those of C. rubriventris , C pangue , and C. luzmarieae by the expanded ventral margin that forms a smooth convex curve, thickest at midlength and gradually tapers to the preapical concavity ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 A – G ). The male of C. aisenensis also lacks the process on S1 that is present in C. colliguay , C. pangue , and C. rubriventris but is somewhat swollen as in C. luzmarieae and C. venticola . Females are unknown.

Description: Male: Length 5.9mm, forewing length 3.8mm, head width 1.6mm.

Colouration: Black-brown with following parts yellow: labrum; base of mandible; inverted T-shape on clypeus ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 A – G ); lower paraocular area to just below antennal socket medially, to below epistomal suture laterally ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 A – G ); dot on apicoventral surface of scape; anterior spot on tegula (remainder pale straw); apex of fore and mid femur; fore tibia except ventral surface suffused with brown; fore tarsus; apex and base of mid tibia and ventral surface suffused with brown; basoventral surface of mid basitarsus; base and apex of hind tibia and along anteroventral margin ( Figs. 2C, D View FIGURE 2 A – G ); base of hind basitarsus; dorsal surface of fore and mid trochanter with yellow-orange apex; ventral surface of antenna orange-brown from apical half of pedicel to terminal flagellomere; anterior margin of apical impressed areas of T1-T7 testaceous; wing venation brown except for testaceous basal regions of R, M+Cu, and V.

Pubescence: Long and thick on face and gena (1-3OD, longest medially; OD~ 0.14mm), with dense, short hairs on vertex (~1.5OD); flagellomeres with short setae; pronotum with short (<OD), laterally directed tomentum on posterodorsal margin; short and woolly on pronotum and lateral margin of mesoscutum (OD); relatively sparse and fine on dorsal surface of thorax (1-2OD) except long on lateral margins of scutellum and metanotum (2-3OD); long and coarse on posterior surface of propodeum and lateral surface of thorax except posterior mesepisternum (2-3OD); coarse on posterodorsal surface of fore femur, ventral surface of mid femur, and anterodorsal surface of hind femur (1-2OD); apical impressed portions of T1-T5 with posteriorly directed hairs, longest laterally (1-2OD); short apical tufts on S1-S4 (<OD).

Surface sculpture: Microsculpture granular; surface moderately dull except face below antenna somewhat shiny; clypeus unevenly punctate (i=1-3d), punctures densest apicolaterally (i~d), as on lower and upper paraocular areas and frons; surface of frons irregularly striate; gena striate with sparse punctures (i=1-3d); dorsal and lateral surfaces of thorax with dense punctures (i~d); dorsal area of propodeum rugose with few, coarse longitudinal striae; dense punctures on terga and S2-S6 apicolaterally (i=d).

Structure: Head broader than long (81:67); IOC less than half OOC (10:26); eyes convergent below, UOD:LOD (50:39); clypeus broader than long (31:21); vertex concave behind ocellar triangle in frontal view; ratio of lengths of pedicel:F1-F3 — 12:8:11:11; gena half as wide as compound eye in lateral view (11:22); relative lengths of scutellum: metanotum: dorsal area of propodeum — 42:22:25; maximum length to maximum depth of hind femur — 85:45; hind tibia with anteroventral margin convex basal to preapical concavity ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 A – G ), maximum length, width, depth of hind tibia — 34:10:14; apex of hind tibia with transverse apical lamina; relative lengths of hind tibia and hind basitarsus — 34:22; S1 swollen apically forming an acute angle in profile; S7 with moderately long lateral lobe, ventrolateral lobe somewhat broad ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 A – G ); apex of S8 with broad concavity ( Fig. 2F View FIGURE 2 A – G ); gonoforceps broad preapically with acute apex ( Fig. 2G View FIGURE 2 A – G ).

Material Examined: CHILE, Region XI: Aisén ( Chile Chico), 250m, 46°33'S, 71°43'W 21.xi.1966, E. I. Schlinger and M. E. Irwin, holotype male ( AMNH).

Geographic Distribution: This species is known only from the type locality and type specimen above ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).

Comment: The junior author collected near the type locality in Argentinean Patagonia in November 2003 but failed to find any C. aisenensis .

AMNH

American Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Colletidae

Genus

Chilicola

SubGenus

Chilicola

Loc

Chilicola (Chilicola) aisenensis Toro and Moldenke

Gibbs, Jason & Packer, Laurence 2006
2006
Loc

Chilicola (Chilicola) aisenensis

Toro and Moldenke 1979
1979
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF