Chinecallicerus pinnatus, Assing, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5356979 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CCE665-2339-542F-FF61-FD17FD647AF3 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Chinecallicerus pinnatus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Chinecallicerus pinnatus View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 1-6 View Figs 1-9 )
T y p e m a t e r i a l: Holotype Ƌ: " CHINA: Sichuan Prov., Wolong National Nature Res., Yinshanggou vill. env., Panda valley , 2300 m, 30°58'08''N, 103°07'34''E / 24.VI.2014, sift #24, depression with accumulated debris under rock walls, in narrow river valley above 2nd tunnel, J. Hájek & J. Růžička leg. / Holotypus Ƌ Chinecallicerus pinnatus sp.n., det. V. Assing 2016" ( NMP). GoogleMaps
E t y m o l o g y: The specific epithet is an adjective derived from the Latin noun pinna (fin) and alludes to the shape of the tubercle on the male tergite VII, which somewhat resembles a shark fin.
D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length 4.6 mm; length of forebody 2.0 mm. Coloration: body blackish, with the elytra blackish-brown and the apex of the abdomen (posterior portion of segment VIII; segments IX-X) paler; legs dark-brown, except for the reddish-yellow tarsi and forelegs; antennae blackish-brown; maxillary palpi blackish-brown, with the terminal needle-shaped palpomere pale-yellowish.
Head ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1-9 ) approximately as long as broad and of subquadrate shape; punctation distinct, dense, and slightly granulose; interstices with shallow microreticulation and glossy. Eyes moderately convex, approximately as long as postocular region, but distinctly shorter than distance from posterior margin of eye to posterior constriction of head in dorsal view. Antenna ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1-9 ) approximately 2.0 mm long; antennomeres IV weakly transverse and V-X weakly oblong.
Pronotum ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1-9 ) indistinctly transverse, only 1.04 times as broad as long and 1.28 times as broad as head, broadest slightly before middle; punctation and microsculpture similar to those of head; pubescence of midline directed caudad.
Elytra ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1-9 ) shorter than pronotum; punctation very dense and finely granulose; fine and rather dense; microreticulation very shallow. Hind wings fully developed.
Abdomen narrower than elytra; punctation moderately dense and fine on tergites III-VI, very sparse and even finer on tergite VII ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1-9 ); microsculpture very shallow on tergites III-VI, more distinct on tergite VII; tergites III and IV without sexual dimorphism; posterior margin of tergite VII with palisade fringe.
Ƌ: tergite VII with pronounced median tubercle in posterior half, this tubercle shaped like a shark´s dorsal fin in lateral view ( Fig. 3 View Figs 1-9 ); posterior margin of tergite VIII with a median pair of acute processes ( Fig. 4 View Figs 1-9 ); sternite VIII with convex posterior margin; median lobe of aedeagus 0.6 mm long and shaped as in Figs 5-6 View Figs 1-9 .
♀: unknown.
D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d n a t u r a l h i s t o r y: The type locality is situated in the Wolong National Nature Reserve, Sichuan, at an altitude of 2300 m. The holotype was sifted from debris near rock walls in a stream valley.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
NMP |
National Museum (Prague) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |