Chone oculata Annenkova, 1952
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.177378 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5697322 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE472C-FFA1-FF87-FF7A-FCB8FB7F9E20 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chone oculata Annenkova, 1952 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Chone oculata Annenkova, 1952 View in CoL new status
Figure 12 View FIGURE 12
Chone murmanica oculata Annenkova, 1952: 153 View in CoL –154.
Material examined. Type material. Laptev Sea [ ZIRAS 47434, syntype], RV Sadko, Sta. 9, 77°25.5’ N, 115° 45.2’ E, 62 m, sandy mud, Coll. G. P. Gorbunov.
Additional material. Chone murmanica Lukasch, 1910 [ ZIRAS 38178, Franz-Joseph Land].
Diagnosis. Tube organic, transparent, more or less incrusted by sand and mud. Anterior peristomial ring (apr) exposed beyond collar dorsally ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 A). Ventral margin of collar higher than dorsal ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 B). Lateral margin of collar with a median depression ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 B). Anterior peristomial ring lobe not exposed beyond collar. Peristomial eyespots present. Glandular ridge on chaetiger 2 narrow. Thoracic segments biannulate. Ventral thoracic shields well developed ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 B).
Remarks. According to Annenkova (1952), Chone murmanica oculata and C. murmanica have similar shape of the collar, branchiae, chaetae and tube, but they differ because C. m. oculata has eyespots on peristomium and despite being bigger, it has less chaetigers. However, C. murmanica has peristomial eyes (see diagnosis of C. murmanica above), and re-examination of type material of C. m. oculata shows additional differences: C. m. oculata has the lateral margin of collar with a median depression (absent in C. murmanica ); the anterior peristomail ring is exposed dorsally (not exposed in C. murmanica ); anterior peristomial ring lobe not exposed beyond collar (bilobed, exposed beyond collar in C. murmanica ); and the entire length of middorsal collar margins forms a narrow gap (very prominent margins and broad gap in C. murmanica ). Thus, C. m. oculata deserves specific status although examination of more materials from the type locality is necessary in order to describe characters from chaetae and uncini, and branchial crown appendages.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chone oculata Annenkova, 1952
Tovar-Hernández, María Ana 2007 |
Chone murmanica oculata
Annenkova 1952: 153 |