Coliates proserpina
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.583183 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2D00AFF5-4FE2-4EC1-A328-C8670CFB8D6D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6047034 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AA87D3-2863-FFF4-F7F0-FC53FBB6B639 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Coliates proserpina |
status |
|
proserpina . Coliates Scudder, 1875
Family incertae sedis.
France, Bouches-du-Rhône, Aix-en-Provence; late Oligocene–early Miocene.
Depository: MNHN (probably).
Published figures: Leestmans (1983: Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ); Scudder (1875: Pl. II Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ).
Only forewings are available in this specimen. It seems that R2 is missing or fused with R1, while M1 is stalked on the common stem of R3, R4 and R5. The latter condition is widespread in Pieridae , but recurs in some Lycaenidae and in one genus ( Microtia ) of Nymphalidae and, thus, is insufficient to identify the fossil as a pierid. Scudder compared the fossil to Delias ( Pieridae , India to Australia), but in this genus there are only three radial branches present. In most pierid genera two radial branches (R1 and R2) arise free from the cell. The fossil does not exhibit additional further characters that could be helpful phylogenetically; we can only identify the fossil as belonging to the Pieridae . Apparently based on Scudder’s comparison of the fossil with Delias and not on a personal inspection of the fossil or of the description, Braby et al. (2006) considered the closest relative the Delias- Prioneris group (possibly Aporia ), and used it as calibration point for this node in the phylogeny of the Pieridae , thus taking the risk that it greatly overestimates the divergence ages in Pieridae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |