Cuscuta yucatana

Stefanović, Mihai Costea Ian Spence Saša, 2011, Systematics of Cuscuta chinensis species complex (subgenus Grammica, Convolvulaceae): evidence for long-distance dispersal and one new species, Organisms Diversity & Evolution (New York, N. Y.) 11 (5), pp. 373-386 : 380

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13127-011-0061-3

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E7F60A-857E-4868-FF01-68DBFBAEE41E

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Cuscuta yucatana
status

 

Cuscuta yucatana View in CoL and C. acuta : convergent or reticulate evolution?

Cuscuta yucatana View in CoL not only exhibits the same type of umbelliform inflorescence that characterizes the C. umbellata View in CoL species complex (“clade L”, Costea and Stefanović 2010), but it also resembles morphologically C. acuta View in CoL —a species that belongs to the latter clade and grows in the Galapagos Islands and the Pacific coast of Ecuador and Peru. Both species have indehiscent fruit in clades with dehiscent (or preponderantly dehiscent) capsules. The similarity between the two species was also noted by Yuncker (1935), who included C. yucatana View in CoL in the same subsection as C. acuta View in CoL (subsect. Acutae) and differentiated the former species by the smaller flowers, longer pedicels, and obovoid shape of its capsules. Homoplasy is observed for many morphological characters in Cuscuta View in CoL ; for example, fruit indehiscence ( Stefanović et al. 2007), pollen features ( Welsh et al. 2010), and numerous gynoecium characters ( Wright et al. 2011). Species from different clades of subg. Grammica may share some elements of morphology (e.g., the same type of inflorescence, flower parts or capsule). Unfortunately, too little is known about the ecology and host range of the two species to attempt a biological explanation of convergent evolution. One common ecological factor may be the halophytic habitat— coastal ( C. acuta View in CoL ) or mainland ( C. yucatana View in CoL )—that these species apparently inhabit. Alternatively, the morphological similarity between C. acuta View in CoL and C. yucatana View in CoL may be explained through putative hybridization involving species from both clades. The evolutionary history of the C. umbellata View in CoL clade has been marked by extensive reticulation among its members ( Costea and Stefanović 2010), and hybridization involving the C. chinensis View in CoL complex and species from another major clade of subg. Grammica (“clade B”) have also been documented ( Stefanović and Costea 2008). Although reticulation involving species from C. chinensis View in CoL and C. umbellata View in CoL clades was not been detected with the molecular markers used in this study, it may be revealed in the future by low-copy nuclear genes ( Stefanović and Costea 2008).

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF