Dasumia antalyaensis, Kunt & Özkütük, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:26591537-2135-4301-AD46-FF4D2D9F7C68 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10201456 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2FBEEF5F-DE7C-49F0-84DD-AB759FF3EC44 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:2FBEEF5F-DE7C-49F0-84DD-AB759FF3EC44 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dasumia antalyaensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dasumia antalyaensis sp. nov.
Figs 1–4 View FIGURES 1–4
Material examined: Holotype 1 ♀ ( ETZM), Finike Dist. , Alacadağ Vill., road of Eroğlu tomb (36°26’12”N 30° 2’22”E), 1810 m, 18 Sept 2014, leg. E.A. Yağmur. GoogleMaps
Etymology: The specific name refers to the area of distribution.
Diagnosis: D. antalyaensis sp. nov. resembles D. cephalleniae Brignoli, 1976 and D. nativitatis Brignoli, 1974 by the strongly sclerotised flat spermathecae, the prominent anterior margins of the anterior arch and the large posterior diverticulum ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–4 ). However, the anterior arc of D. antalyaensis sp. nov. differ from D. cephalleniae and D. nativitatis . Namely, in D. antalyaensis sp. nov. the tip of the spermatheca is narrow and slightly concave, while in D. cephalleniae and D. nativitatis it is broad and straight. Besides these: D. antalyaensis sp. nov. has numerous spines on femora III, D. cephalleniae has no spines, D. nativitatis has only three spines ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–4 ). There is also a significant variation in body size between the species. Comparing the females of the three species, D. antalyaensis sp. nov. is bigger than both D. nativitatis and it is larger than D. cephalleniae in terms of body length.
Description: Measurements: [Holotype ♀] TL 6.50; AL 3.75; CL 2.75; CW 2.15; Clh 0.07; AEd 0.14; iAE 0.06; PLEd 0.13; PMEd 0.12; ChF 0.38; ChG 0.38; ChL 1.15.
Large sized harpacteine spiders. Carapace reddish dark brown; fovea longitudinal, black and distinct ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–4 ). There is a tonal difference between cephalic and thoracic regions. AE, PLE and PME arranged annulary, all of them close to each other. Sternum and gnatocoxae reddish brown. Labium and chelicerae reddish. Cheliceral groove with four teeth. Promarginal teeth strongly developed at the base of the cheliceral groove, of the same size and arranged in a row. The first of the retromarginal teeth is aligned with the second of the promarginal teeth. The retromarginal teeth are smaller than the promarginal teeth, but they are also the same size and approximately two tooth lengths apart ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–4 ).
Abdomen cream colored, covered with short blackish setae ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–4 ). Legs brown. There are tonal differences at the distal and proximal parts of the leg segments. Leg formula: IV, I, II, III. Leg spination and measurements are given in Tables 1 and 2.
Vulva ( Figs 3–4 View FIGURES 1–4 ): Tip of spermathecal keel narrow, patelliform, very slightly concave. Spermatheca straight. Anterior margin of the anterior arch strongly concave. Edges are wide, convex, membranous, less sclerotized than the middle and oriented towards the anterior. The transversal bar is wider than the anterior arc. Central part strongly sclerotised, membranous towards the margins, with the tips curved inwards. Posterior diverticulum membranous, circular, almost the same width as the width of the anterior arc.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |