Dendrocolaptes rufus Wied, 1831: 1130
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2000)257<0001:TSOBIT>2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6F618792-FFB8-FD50-294F-D477FE6FF922 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dendrocolaptes rufus Wied, 1831: 1130 |
status |
|
Dendrocolaptes rufus Wied, 1831: 1130 (inneren gegenden der Provinzen Minas und Bahia).
HOLOTYPE: Wied described only the male, which was not found by Allen (1889: 248) or by us. Wied himself thought this form to be very similar to Dendrocolaptes bivittatus Spix , as it was then understood. Cory and Hellmayr (1925: 338) discussed this form and thought it might be any one of three subspecies of Lepidocolaptes angustirostris : bivittatus (Lichtenstein) , coronatus (Lesson), or even a pale-bellied form of L. a. bahiae. Without the type, a satisfactory answer is not possible.
Lepidocolaptes angustirostris hellmayri
Naumburg Lepidocolaptes angustirostris hellmayri Naumburg, 1925: 421 ( Chilon GoogleMaps , Prov. Santa Cruz, Bolivia, alt. 5600 ft.). Now GoogleMaps Lepidocolaptes angustirostris hellmayri Naumburg, 1925 . See Peters, 1951: 50. HOLOTYPE: AMNH 139335 , male, collected at Chilón, 5600 ft, 17°59′S, 64°36′W, Santa Cruz, Bolivia, on 6 October 1915, by Leo E. Miller (no.
13956) and Howarth S. Boyle.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |