Deutonura schulzi, Smolis & Skarżyński & Gwiazdowicz, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5278.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E84EA49C-11B0-4022-8C66-87A54CEA71A9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7906305 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5211B409-281F-FFFB-FF30-52E3FD43F9F2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Deutonura schulzi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Deutonura schulzi sp. nov.
Figs 23–29 View FIGURES 23–29 , Tab. 1 View TABLE 1
Type material. Holotype: male, bark of Zelkova abelicea trees, slope of Mt. Kedros near Gerakari village (35.194829 N, 24.606713 E), 1255 m a. s. l., Crete, Greece, 11.X.2018, leg. D.J. Gwiazdowicz. GoogleMaps Paratype: male, same data as holotype.
Description. General. Habitus typical of genus. Dorsal tubercles present and well developed. Body length (without antennae): 1.25 to 1.52 mm (holotype: 1.52 mm). Colour of the body bluish grey. 2 + 2 large black eyes, in a typical arrangement for the genus ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–29 ).
Chaetal morphology. Dorsal ordinary chaetae of three types: long macrochaetae (Ml), short macrochaetae (Mc) and mesochaetae. Long macrochaetae thickened, slightly arc-like or straight, narrowly sheathed, serrated and apically rounded. Macrochaetae Mc similar to long macrochaetae, but shorter. Mesochaetae similar to ventral chaetae, thin, smooth and pointed. S-chaetae of terga thin, smooth and short, clearly shorter than nearby macrochaetae ( Figs 23, 29 View FIGURES 23–29 ).
Antennae. Typical of the genus. Dorsal chaetotaxy of Ant. III–IV as Tab. 1b View TABLE 1 . S-chaetae of Ant. IV of medium length and relatively thin, sensillum sgd short and straight. Apical vesicle distinct, trilobate. Ventral chaetotaxy of Ant. III and Ant. IV as Tab. 1b View TABLE 1 .
Mouthparts. Buccal cone relatively short and wide, labral sclerifications nonogival ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 23–29 ). Labrum chaetotaxy: 4/2, 4. Labium as in Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23–29 . Maxilla styliform ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23–29 ), mandible relatively thin and tridentate ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23–29 ).
Dorsal chaetotaxy and tubercles. Head, Th. and Abd. without free chaetae. Cephalic tubercles Af and Cl fused. Head with two granular areas, between chaetae A and B, and between chaetae C and D ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–29 ). Elementary tubercles DE and EE on head present. Head without chaeta O. Chaetae Dl3 and DL6 on head as Mc. Th. I with tubercles Di and De not fused. Chaetae Di3 on Th. II-III not free. On Th. III, chaetae De2 and De3 nearly equal in length. On Abd. I–III, chaetae De2 and De3 nearly equal in length ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23–29 ). Tubercles Di on Abd. V not bilobed. Cryptopygy well developed, Abd. VI not visible from above ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 23–29 ).
Ventral chaetotaxy. On head, groups Vea, Vem and Vep with 4, 3, 4 chaetae respectively. Group Vi on head with 6 chaetae. On Abd. IV, furca rudimentary without macrochaetae. On Abd. V, chaetae Vl present and L’ absent. Male ventral organ absent.
Legs. Chaetotaxy of legs as in Fig. 28 View FIGURES 23–29 and Tab. 1c View TABLE 1 . Claw with internal tooth ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 23–29 ). On tibiotarsi, chaeta M present and chaetae B4 and B5 relatively short.
Etymology. Dedicated to Dr. Hans-J̧rgen Schulz, who made a significant contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Crete.
Remarks. Viewing the last published key of the genus ( Deharveng et al. 2015), Deutonura schulzi sp. nov. seems to be closest to D. vallespirensis Deharveng, 1982 , species described and known from the French Pyrenees ( Deharveng 1982). However, these species differ in few but important characters, including the number of chaetae (L+So) on the head (7–8 in D. vallespirensis , 10 in D. schulzi sp. nov.), the shape of granular area between chaetae C and D (quadratic in D. vallespirensis , rectangular in D. schulzi sp. nov.), the number of chaetae (De+Dl+L) on Abd. V (6+s in D. vallespirensis , 7+s in D. schulzi sp. nov.) and the presence of internal tooth on claw (absent in D. vallespirensis , present in D. schulzi sp. nov.). Especially the latter character of the new species is worth emphasizing as it is unknown or not described within the genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |