Diogma caudata Takahashi, 1960
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1083.75624 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D263A9C3-D2EB-4A2D-9D7F-ECAC41AFD710 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6FC19634-5F8D-530A-AE79-9175863D5D60 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Diogma caudata Takahashi, 1960 |
status |
|
Diogma caudata Takahashi, 1960 View in CoL
Figs 4B View Figure 4 , 5C View Figure 5 , 8B View Figure 8 , 11 View Figure 11 , 12 View Figure 12 , 13 View Figure 13
Diogma caudata in Takahashi 1960: 82-84: original description; Siitonen 1984: 203: faunistic record; Sidorenko 1999: 68-70: identification key, illustration, distribution; Oosterbroek et al. 2001: 122: distribution; Paramonov 2004a: 258: faunistic record; Paramonov 2005: 211: comparison; Mukkala et al. 2005: 7: faunistic record; Bartsch et al. 2005: red list status, faunistic record; Paramonov 2006: 888-889: identification key, illustration, distribution; Polevoi 2006: 96: faunistic records; Sandström 2008: red list status; Salmela 2008: 12: ecology; Salmela 2012a: 242: distribution; Salmela 2012b: 16: distribution; Salmela and Petrašiūnas 2014: 31: checklist; Nakamura 2014: 54: distribution.
Type material examined.
Diogma caudata Takahashi: Holotype: • ♂; Japan, Hokkaido, Mount Meakandake; 5 Jul. 1958; M. Takahashi leg.; ELUK.
Non-type material examined.
Finland • 3 ♂, 1 ♀; Kaavi, Kalalamminpuro; 63.11458°N, 28.67255°E; alt. 140 m; 20 Jun. 2008 - 17 Jul. 2008; J. Salmela leg.; LMM, CKLP. Russia • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Arkhangelsk Oblast, Plesetsk District, Obozersky Settlement, around the settlement; 63.44231°N, 40.30789°E; alt. 100 m; 26 Jun. 1959; N.P. Krivosheina leg.; CKLP. • 1 ♂; Karelia Republic, Kon: 6909:550, Kondopoga District, Kivach Nature Reserve, spruce forest; 62.26766°N, 33.97975°E, alt. 42 m; 19 May. 1993 - 23 Jun. 1993; A.V. Polevoi leg.; window trap; ZIN. • 1 ♂; Karelia Republic, Karelia, Kon: 6982:570, Medvezhyegorsk Urban Settlement, 3 km NW Medvezhyegorsk City, point № 6; 62.93364°N, 34.38467°E; alt. 130 m; 19 Jul. 2002; A.V. Polevoi leg.; ZIN. • 1 ♂; Perm Krai, Kungur Urban Okrug, Kungur City, forest station; 57.42881°N, 56.944206°E; alt. 219 m; 16 Jun. 1960; K.B. Borisova leg.; ZIN. • 1 ♂; Tuva Republic, Tandinsky District, north slope of Tannu-Ola mountains, near Chagytaj Lake; 50.99591°N, 94.6764°E; alt. 1500 m; 24 Jun. 1963; N.A. Violovich leg.; ZIN. Sweden • 2 ♂; Lule Lappmark, Kaltbacken bei Messaure; 66.67347°N, 20.32239°E; alt. 240 m; 23 Jun. 1969 - 26 Jun. 1969; • 1 ♀; same locality; 22 Jun. 1970 - 24 Jun. 1970; • 2 ♂; same locality; 23 Jun. 1971 - 30 Jun. 1971; • 31 ♂, 4 ♀; same locality; 12 Jun. 1972 - 13 Jul. 1972 / 21. Aug. 1972 - 28 Aug. 1972; • 2 ♂; same locality; 19 Jun. 1973 - 25 Jun. 1973; • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; same locality; 17 Jun. 1974 - 8 Jul. 1974; K. Müller leg.; ZFMK.
Redescription.
Head. Dorsally dark brown, ventrally brown. Frons with white pubescence noticeable only in dry specimens (Fig. 11C, D View Figure 11 ). Rostrum pale brown, short, without nasus, with few hairs. Mouthparts pale brown to brown (Fig. 11C, D View Figure 11 ). Palpus pale brown to brown, short, five segmented; last segment slightly longer than penultimate segment (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 ). Scape cylindrical, 2 × as long as pedicel; pedicel ovate, slightly darker than scape; flagellum 14-segmented, gradually darkening from base to tip; segments simple in both sexes, not expanded ventrally (Figs 4B View Figure 4 , 11E, F View Figure 11 ); in male, first flagellomere as long as wide, remaining segments cylindrical; last segment 1.2-1.3 × as long as penultimate segment; flagellomeres with short, relative sparse whitish setae (sensilla), just slightly denser in ventral and lateral sides (Fig. 11E View Figure 11 ); in female, last flagellomere 1.8-2 × as long as penultimate; last 4-6 segments without sensilla (Figs 4B View Figure 4 , 10F View Figure 10 ). Verticels black, shorter than length of flagellomere; usually one verticel in ventral surface and two or three in dorsal/dorsolateral sides, first segment with 4-6 verticels.
Thorax. General colouration yellowish brown with contrasting, shiny black markings. Mesonotum pale brown, greenish yellow in fresh, living specimen ( Takahashi 1960), with three separated, broad, longitudinal black markings (Fig. 11C View Figure 11 ); several small yellow setae along pale strips. Scutellum yellow. Posterior part of mediotergite black. Anepisternum and katepisternum separated, both ventral parts dark brown to black. Ventral corner of laterotergite black. Additional small darker patch on posterior basalare, and on ventral part of meron. Coxa and trochanter yellowish, darker on anterior- dorsal parts (Fig. 11B View Figure 11 ); femur pale brown; tibia gradually darkening from pale brown to dark brown/black; tarsus uniformly black. Wing hyaline; veins pale brown to brown; pterostigma pale (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ); three branches of M reaching wing margin; M1 in same level as M1+2; cell a2 narrow,> 7 × longer than wide (Fig. 5B View Figure 5 ); membrane with interference patterns, visible with dark background (Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ). Halter monochrome, yellow or pale brown.
Abdomen. Tergites and sternites pale brown to brown, tergite 8 and sternite 8 darker than others (Fig. 11A View Figure 11 ). Pleural parts greenish in living specimen ( Takahashi 1960).
Male terminalia: Black, large, complex, directed caudally. Tergite 9 not fused with gonocoxite, partly cover gonocoxite (Fig. 12C View Figure 12 ); medial part rounded with small tuft of hairs (Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ); lateral lobe of tergite 9 greatly extended, complex; as long as basal part of tergite 9; ventral portion of lateral lobe elongated, finger-like in lateral view (Fig. 12C View Figure 12 ); lateral margin almost straight or weakly divergent in dorsal view (Fig. 12A, B View Figure 12 ); ventral base of lateral lobe with small, black, heavily sclerotised lobe (Fig. 12C, E View Figure 12 ) - named lamina by some authors - shape variable; posterior margin of tergite 9 between median round part and lateral lobe covered with dense short, blunt ended setae (Fig. 12A View Figure 12 ). Gonocoxite complex; apical lobe with dense hairs (Fig. 12B-D View Figure 12 ); ventral lobe round, almost bare (Fig. 12B, D View Figure 12 ); inner part of gonocoxite with basally directed lobe, with hairs on margin (Fig. 12D View Figure 12 ). Gonostylus simple, wider at middle (Fig. 12F View Figure 12 ); with finger-like membranous lobe on inner side, poorly visible in dry specimens (Fig. 12G View Figure 12 ). Aedeagus bifid; aedeagus with apical branches long, curved ventrally almost in right angle, then curved in right angle posteriorly, then turn dorsally in right angle in lateral view (Fig. 12J View Figure 12 ); dorsal lobe between interbases complex, sclerotised (Fig. 12H, J View Figure 12 ); interbase with ventral projection (Fig. 12J View Figure 12 ). Sperm pump and ejaculatory apodeme small (Fig. 12H-J View Figure 12 ), covered by parameres in lateral view (Fig. 12J View Figure 12 ).
Female terminalia: Brown, tip of cercus and hypopygial valve yellowish brown. Tergite 8 separated at middle by membranous area (Fig. 13A View Figure 13 ). Tergites 8 and 9 similar in size (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ). Ventral corner of tergite 9 rugged (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ). Triangular sclerite separated from tip of tergite 10 (Fig. 13A View Figure 13 ). Lateral lobes of tergite 10 elongated, with few longer hairs (Fig. 13A, B View Figure 13 ). Cercus and hypogynial valve simple, wide, blade-shaped, tips rounded (Fig. 13B View Figure 13 ). Dorsal apical surface of cercus rough, formed by few blunt, pyramid or round teeth (Fig. 13A, B View Figure 13 ). Base of sternite 8, weakly sclerotised, extended laterally at middle, with transverse creases (Fig. 13AC). Two round spermathecae present, duct curved (Fig. 13D View Figure 13 ). Lateral sclerite of genital fork elongated; two sperm ducts simple, without any clear markings (Fig. 13D View Figure 13 ).
Distribution.
Finland, Japan (Hokkaido I, Fig. 8B View Figure 8 ), Sweden, and Russia (Kareliya Republic, Perm Krai and Tuva) ( Oosterbroek 2021). First records from Arkhangelsk Oblast, Russia.
Comments.
The species was initially described from Hokkaido, Japan. However, no additional Japanese data has been published, and the species was not found in the type locality in our study. The species later was reported from Finland, Sweden, and Russia (Karelia Republic, Perm Krai, and Tuva). Morphologically it is a well separated species from the close related Diogma glabrata , but the Finnish specimens show only a small COI genetic difference from it and form a clade together with the West Palearctic D. glabrata . No significant morphological differences were found between the Finnish and Russian specimens and the Japanese holotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Diogma caudata Takahashi, 1960
Kolcsar, Levente-Peter, Paramonov, Nikolai, Imada, Yume, Kato, Daichi, Gamboa, Maribet, Shinoka, Dai, Kato, Makoto & Watanabe, Kozo 2022 |
Diogma caudata
Takahashi 1960 |