Discoxenus cambodiensis, Kanao, Taisuke & Maruyama, Munetoshi, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7000893A-A8BC-4196-B76D-385C97B96FBD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6111777 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0395F739-FFA2-BF2D-FF02-1CCBFC81B8A0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Discoxenus cambodiensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Discoxenus cambodiensis View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 , 38–53 View FIGURES 38 – 53 )
Type materials. Holotype: ♂, 1 km S of Angkor Wat, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 18 VIII 2012, Maruyama M. leg. (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-001).
Paratypes: Cambodia: 11♂♂, 5♀♀, same data as holotype (1♂, 1♀, completely dissected). 11♂♂, 13♀♀, 1 km SW of Angkor Wat, Siem Reap, 20 VIII 2012, Maruyama M. leg. (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-0011). 1♀, 1 km W of Banteay Prei, Siem Reap, 21 VIII 2012, Maruyama M. leg. (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-0019). 1♂, 1♀, same date and locality data as the former specimens (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-0020). 3♂♂, 7♀♀, 1 km S of Ankor Wat, Charles De Gaulle, Siem Reap, Maruyama M. leg. (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-0022). 2♂♂, 8♀♀, 1.6 km SW of Angkor Wat, Siem Reap, 21 VIII 2014, Kakizoe S. leg. (Colony no. SK010).
Diagnosis. This species is easily distinguished from all other species by the macrochaetotaxy of tergites III– VIII (6, 6, 6, 4, 4, 4). This species is most similar to D. latiabdominalis , but is distinguishable from it by a more slender body ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ), abdominal sternites V–VII without setae except for posterior margin, paramere with narrower paramerite which is approximately 4 times wider than condylite ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ), and spermatheca with longer basal part which is approximately 2 times longer than apical part ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ).
Description. Head ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) approximately 1.5 times wider than long, with anterior margin of clypeus rounded. Antenna ( Figs. 3, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 , 39 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with segment I longer than other segments; segment II as long as segment IV, with 3 macrosetae; segment III bowl shaped, shorter than other segments; segment IV wider than long, dilated distally; segment V wider than other segments, wider than long; segments VI–X successively narrowed distally; segments VI–VII wider than long; segment VIII subquadrate; segments IX–X longer than wide; segment XI approximately 2.3 times longer than wide, widest at middle. Labrum ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 38 – 53 , left side) with anterior margin concave; median projection of apodeme rounded; 5–6 lateral setae present in ventral view ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 38 – 53 , right side). Mandibles ( Figs. 41, 42 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) covered with more than 80 pores. Left mandible ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) moderately produced adorally at middle. Right mandible ( Fig. 42 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with a small and rounded tooth. Maxillary palpal segment III approximately 2.3 times longer than wide. Mentum ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) 2 times wider than long, covered with more than 70 pores. Labium with prementum covered with 15–20 pores.
Pronotum ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) sparsely covered with more than 80 macrosetae. Elytron ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) transverse, sparsely covered with yellow setae, 21–23 macrosetae present on disc. Metaventrite 1.3 times longer than mesoventrite, without macrosetae.
Tergites III–VIII ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ) glabrous, almost without setae except for each posterior margin. Tergite VIII ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with posterior margin moderately rounded, 2 pairs of macrosetae present at posterior margin, with 4 short setae at middle of posterior margin. Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites III–VIII = 6, 6, 6, 4, 4, 4. Sternites III–IV ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ) partially covered with setae. Sternites V–VIII almost nude. Sternites III–VIII densely covered with minute pores anteriorly. Sternites III–VI with a row of 4–8 macrosetae at posterior margin.
Male. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with 4 pairs of macrosetae on posterior half, minute setae present at posterior margin. Median lobe of aedeagus ( Figs. 50, 51 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with basal capsule longer than apical lobe. Paramere ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with paramerite approximately 4 times wider than condylite; velar sac sclerite with 3 setae; apical lobe with 3 minute setae at apex.
Female. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with 3 pairs of macrosetae, several minute setae present at posterior margin. Spermatheca ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 38 – 53 ) with basal part more than 2 times longer than apical part.
Measurement. Body length = average 1.91 mm (2.11– 1.75 mm, N = 10), pronotal length = average 0.66 mm (0.65–0.68 mm, N = 10), pronotal width = average 0.96 mm (0.92–1.00 mm, N = 10), elytral length = average 0.46 mm (0.43–0.51 mm, N = 10), elytral width = average 0.63 mm (0.61–0.66 mm, N = 10).
Etymology. The specific Latinized epithet is derived from Cambodia where its type locality was found.
Host species. Odontotermes maesodensis Ahmad, 1965 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Aleocharinae |
Genus |