Discoxenus hirsutus, Kanao, Taisuke & Maruyama, Munetoshi, 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4044.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7000893A-A8BC-4196-B76D-385C97B96FBD |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6111785 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0395F739-FFA9-BF28-FF02-1E45FE45BB0F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Discoxenus hirsutus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Discoxenus hirsutus View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs. 9, 10 View FIGURES 5 – 12 , 89–104 View FIGURES 89 – 104 )
Type materials. Holotype: ♂, 500 m S of Ankor Wat, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 5 VI 2012, Maruyama M. (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-1-002).
Paratypes: Cambodia: 4♂♂, 16♀♀, same as holotype (1♂, completely dissected, 1♂, abdominal segments VIII–X dissected off). 6♂♂, North Wall of Preah Khan, Siem Reap, 19 VIII 2012, Maruyama M. leg. (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-005) (1♂, completely dissected). 1♀, 1 km W of Banteay Prei, Siem Reap, 21 VIII 2012, Maruyama M. leg. (Colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-0017) (abdominal segments VIII–X dissected off). 2♂♂, 1♀, Ankor Thom, Siem Reap, 12 XII 2012, Kanao T. leg. (Colony no. KT433) (1♂, completely dissected). 1♂, 2♀♀, 0.76 km NE of Preah Kham, Siem Reap, 18 VIII 2014, Kakizoe S. & Maruyama M. leg. (Colony no. SK002). 1♀, same locality data to SK002, 19 VIII 2014, Kakizoe S. leg. (Colony no. SK007).
Diagnosis. This species is easily distinguished from other Discoxenus species by a combination of the following two character states: the macrochaetotaxy of tergites III–VIII (6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6), and sternites VI–VII with two transverse rows of 6–14 macrosetae at middle and posterior margin. This species is most similar to D. phourini , but is distinguishable from it by the elytra with 10 macrosetae on disc ( Fig. 96 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ), and spermatheca with shorter basal part which is less than 2 times longer than apical part ( Fig. 104 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ).
Description. Head ( Fig. 89 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) approximately 1.3 times wider than long. Antenna ( Figs. 9, 10 View FIGURES 5 – 12 , 90 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with segment I longer than other segments; segment II as long as segment III with 2 macrosetae; segment III dilated apically; segment IV transverse; segment V wider than other segments; segments VI–XI successively narrowed distally; segments VI–VII wider than long; segment VIII subquadrate; segments IX–X longer than wide; segment XI approximately 2 times longer than wide, widest around middle. Labrum ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 89 – 104 , left side) with anterior margin deeply concave at middle; median projection of apodeme produced posteriorly, with apex rounded; 5–6 lateral setae present in ventral view ( Fig. 91 View FIGURES 89 – 104 , right side). Mandibles ( Figs. 92, 93 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) covered with 20–30 pores. Left mandible ( Fig. 92 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with adoral margin moderately pointed around middle. Right mandible ( Fig. 93 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with a small tooth. Maxillary palpal segment III approximately 2 times longer than wide. Mentum ( Fig. 94 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) approximately 2 times wider than long, covered with around 50 pores. Labium with prementum covered with 12–14 pores.
Pronotum ( Fig. 95 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) sparsely covered with approximately 46 macrosetae, 6 minute setae present around anterior margin. Elytron ( Fig. 96 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) transverse, sparsely covered with several setae at anterolateral outer corner, 10 macrosetae present on disc. Metaventrite approximately 1.5 times as long as mesoventrite.
Tergites III–VI ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 5 – 12 ) almost without yellow setae. Tergite VII with a row of yellow setae subapically. Tergite VIII ( Fig. 97 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with posterior margin pointed, 3 pairs of macrosetae present at posterior margin, 2 pairs of macrosetae present around middle. Macrochaetotaxy of abdominal tergites III–VIII = 6, 6, 6, 6, 6, 6. Sternite III ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 5 – 12 ) with posterior half densely covered with setae. Sternites IV–VIII with a row of 4–6 yellow setae at middle. Sternites III–VII with 6–10 macrosetae at posterior margin, a row of 10–16 macrosetae present at middle.
Male. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 98 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with 4 pairs of macrosetae around posterior margin and middle, respectively. Median lobe of aedeagus moderately narrowed towards apical lobe in ventral view ( Fig. 101 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ); basal capsule with distal crest rounded apically ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ); apical lobe less than half as wide as basal capsule in lateral view ( Fig. 102 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ). Paramere ( Fig. 103 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with paramerite more than 3 times wider than condylite; velar sac sclerite with 5–6 setae; apical lobe with 2–4 minute setae at apex.
Female. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 99 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with 3 pairs of macrosetae at posterior margin, 11–12 macrosetae present around middle. Spermatheca ( Fig. 104 View FIGURES 89 – 104 ) with basal part less than 2 times longer than apical part.
Measurement. Body length = average 1.68 mm (1.55–1.70 mm, N = 10), pronotal length = average 0.60 mm (0.58–0.63 mm, N = 10), pronotal width = average 0.84 mm (0.80–0.87 mm, N = 10), elytral length = average 0.43 mm (0.41–0.44 mm, N = 10), elytral width = average 0.47 mm (0.46–0.51 mm, N = 10).
Etymology. The specific epithet hirsutus is a Latin adjective meaning “hairy,” in reference to the diagnostic number of macrosetae on the abdominal sternites.
Host species. Hypotermes makhamensis Ahmad, 1965 and H. cf. xenotermitis ( Wasmann, 1896) .
Comments. A total of ten specimens of D. hirsutus were found in three colonies of H. makhamensis (colony no. MMCB-T-2012-2-005, MMCB-T-2012-2-017, and KT433) while 21 specimens were found in one nest of H. cf. xenotermitis (MMCB-T-2012-1-002). All these beetles were directly collected from the fungus gardens of the two termite species, and never attacked by their hosts. It is unlikely that the one of these host species may be accidental.
There were no morphological differences between the specimens collected from nests of H. makhamensis and H. cf. xenotermitinis.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Aleocharinae |
Genus |