Dysdera atabekia, Zamani & Marusik, 2024

Zamani, Alireza & Marusik, Yuri M., 2024, New data on Dysdera Latreille, 1804 and Harpactea Bristowe, 1939 (Araneae: Dysderidae) of the Caucasus, with new species and records, Zootaxa 5397 (2), pp. 195-217 : 196-199

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5397.2.2

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C55178A5-DABB-4615-8443-59B388F99A36

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10479557

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DC9030-FFA6-FFAD-6EFA-FA13FE79E180

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Dysdera atabekia
status

sp. nov.

Dysdera atabekia sp. n.

Figs 1A, B View FIGURE 1 , 2A–H View FIGURE 2 , 10A, B, D View FIGURE 10 , 13A View FIGURE 13

Type material. Holotype ♂ ( ZMMU), AZERBAIJAN: Goychay District: Bygyr , [40°36'25.3"N 47°51'03.4"E], 25.07.2003 (N. Snegovaya, H. Aliev) GoogleMaps . Paratype: 1♀ ( ZMMU), same data as for the holotype GoogleMaps .

Other material. AZERBAIJAN: Ismayilli District: 1♂ ( ZMMU), Xanagah , [40°50'59.9"N 48°08'47.9"E], 01.10.2003 (E.F. Guseinov) ( Fig. 2E–H View FIGURE 2 ) GoogleMaps .

Etymology. The specific epithet is an adjective referring to “Atabek”, a title used by rulers in the Seljuk Empire, which controlled Azerbaijan in the 11th–13th centuries.

Diagnosis. The male of the new species is most similar to that of D. karabachica Dunin, 1990 by having a similar crest (C) and anterodorsally stretched lateral margin of the lateral sheet (LML), but can be distinguished by having a fine spine on the angled crest (vs. spine absent, crest gradually rounded) and having no teeth on the lateral margin of the lateral sheet (cf. Fig. 2A, E View FIGURE 2 and Dunin 1990: fig. 3.1). The females of the two species differ by the shape of the receptacle (Re) and the dorsal arch (DA): the new species has triangular anterolateral margins of receptacle (vs. rounded), and dorsal arch with converging lateral margins (vs. parallel) (cf. Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 and Dunin 1990: fig. 3.3).

Description. Male (Holotype). Habitus as in Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 . Total length 8.27. Carapace 3.82 long, 2.98 wide. Eye sizes: AE 0.22, PME 0.17, PLE 0.22. Carapace and chelicerae reddish brown; carapace slightly lighter posteriorly. Sternum, labium and maxillae reddish. Legs yellowish orange.Abdomen dark beige, without any pattern. Spinnerets uniformly dark beige. Measurements of legs: I: 10.56 (2.95, 1.94, 2.63, 2.39, 0.65), II: 9.79 (2.76, 1.71, 2.38, 2.30, 0.64), III: 7.14 (2.15, 1.09, 1.31, 1.98, 0.61), IV: 9.56 (2.75, 1.50, 2.06, 2.54, 0.71). Spination: I, II: no spines. III: Ti: 2pl, 1rl, 2v; Mt: 3pl, 3rl, 6v. IV: Fe: 1(3)d; Ti: 2pl, 2rl, 3v; Mt: 4pl, 3rl, 6v.

Spination of the specimen from Ismayilli: Spination: I, II: no spines. III: Ti: 2pl, 1(2)rl, 3v; Mt: 3pl, 2rl, 5v. IV: Fe: 1d; Ti: 2pl, 3rl, 5v; Mt: 4pl, 4rl, 5v.

Palp as in Figs 2A–H View FIGURE 2 , 10A–B, D View FIGURE 10 ; bulb 3 times longer than tegulum (T) wide; psembolus 1.5 times longer than tegulum (in retrolateral view), lateral margin of the lateral sheet claw-like, its tip bet anteriorly; crest high, ca. 1.88 times longer than high, posterior part angled, mid part with small spine-like process, tip membranous and anteriorly bent.

Female. Habitus as in Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 . Total length 8.78. Carapace 4.29 long, 3.28 wide. Eye sizes: AE 0.18, PME 0.18, PLE 0.19. Colouration and spination as in male. Measurements of legs: I: 10.30 (2.77, 1.93, 2.53, 2.37, 0.70), II: 10.12 (2.93, 1.85, 2.40, 2.24, 0.70), III: 7.60 (2.11, 1.42, 1.41, 2.01, 0.65), IV: 10.42 (2.87, 1.63, 2.27, 2.84, 0.81).

Endogyne as in Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ; receptacle (Re) with triangular anterior edges; dorsal arch (DA) subtrapezoidal, ca. 2 times broader than long, anterior margin slightly rounded; transversal bar (TB) thinner than receptacle.

Comment. The specimen from Ismayilli is tentatively attributed to this species, due to small differences observed in the shape of the crest and the lateral margin of the lateral sheet (cf. Fig. 2A–D and E–H View FIGURE 2 ), as well as in the spination. Given the relatively short aerial distance between the two localities (i.e., 36 km; Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 ) and the availability of only a single male specimen from each site, these differences are tentatively considered as intraspecific variations. It is worth noting that similar variations have been documented in other species of Dysdera ( Dunin 1992b) .

Distribution. Known only from the listed localities in Goychay and Ismayilli districts, central and northern Azerbaijan ( Fig. 19 View FIGURE 19 ).

ZMMU

Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Dysderidae

Genus

Dysdera

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF