Echinopodium Freeman
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3726.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:08A48B59-093E-48A0-A07F-4A19CABA3F56 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5268386 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B287E7-3823-FFC9-0F90-FA0500D9FB1C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Echinopodium Freeman |
status |
|
Echinopodium Freeman View in CoL
Echinopodium Freeman 1951: 45 View in CoL . Type-species, E. nigricoxa Freeman View in CoL (orig. des.).
E. curvispina Freeman 1951: 47 View in CoL , figs. 94–95 (♂ terminalia). Type-locality: Argentina, Río Negro, Puerto Blest. Holotype ♂, NHM.
( Figure 140 View FIGURES 134–142 )
Notes. The type series included the male holotype and a female paratype, both of which are at the NHM. The holotype labes are: “ Echinopodium / curvispina [hw] / Freeman. / HOLOTYPE ” [printed on red label]” // [male terminalia on a microslide attached to a pinned plastic stripe]” // “HOLO- / TYPE” [printed in black on a rounded label with red border]” // “Nahuel Huapi, / Puerto Blest. / 2–3.xii.1926.” // “ Argentina: / Terr. Río Negro. / F. & M. Edwards / B.M. 1927–63.” // “BMNH(E) # / 257713”. The holotype is in excellent condition. The paratype collection number is BMNH(E) # 257714 .
E. digitalis Freeman 1951: 47 View in CoL , figs. 87 (midcoxal process), 91–93 (♂ terminalia). Type-locality: Chile, Llanquihue, Casa Pangue. Ref.— Duret 1974: 98, figs. 1–3 (midcoxal process, ♂ terminalia). Holotype ♂, NHM.
( Figure 141 View FIGURES 134–142 )
Notes. The type series included the male holotype, a male and two female paratypes, all of which are at the NHM. The holotype labels are as follows: “ Echinopodium / digitalis [hw] / Freeman. / HOLOTYPE ” [printed on red label]” // [male terminalia on a microslide attached to a pinned plastic stripe]” // “HOLO- / TYPE” [printed in black on a rounded label with red border]” // “Casa Pangue. / 4–10.xii.1926.” // “S. Chile: / Llanquihue Prov. / F. & M. Edwards / B.M. 1927–63.” // “BMNH(E) # / 257709”. The holotype is in good condition. The paratypes are numbered BMNH(E) # 257710-2 .
E. flagellatum Freeman 1951: 48 View in CoL , fig. 86 (midcoxal process), 96–98 (♂ terminalia). Type-locality: Argentina, Rio Negro, Puerto Blest. Ref.— Duret 1974: 98, figs. 4–9 (palpus, midcoxal process, tibial spur, ♂ terminalia). Holotype ♂, NHM.
( Figure 142 View FIGURES 134–142 )
Notes. The type series included the male holotype, twelve male and seven female paratypes, of which the holotype, nine male and four female paratypes, plus a paratype with a broken abdomen, are at the NHM. The holotype labels are: “ Echinopodium / flagellatum [hw] / Freeman. / HOLOTYPE ” [printed on red label]” // [male terminalia on a microslide attached to a pinned plastic stripe]” // “HOLO- / TYPE” [printed in black on a rounded label with red border]” // “Nahuel Huapi, / Puerto Blest. / 2–3.xii.1926.” // “ Argentina: / Terr. Río Negro. / F. & M. Edwards / B.M. 1927–63.” // “BMNH(E) # / 257715”. The holotype is in good condition. The paratype numbers are BMNH(E) # 257716-29, many of the males with the terminalia dissected .
E. nigricoxa Freeman 1951: 42 View in CoL , fig. 82 (mouthparts), 83 (midcoxal process), 88–90 (♂ terminalia). Type-locality: Argentina, Río Negro, Bariloche. Holotype ♂, NHM.
( Figure 143 View FIGURES 143–151 )
Notes. The type series included the male holotype, twenty-eight male and eleven female paratypes, of which the holotype, twenty-one males and eight females are at the NHM. The labels with the holotype are: “ Echinopodium / nigricoxa [hw] / Freeman. / HOLOTYPE ” [printed on red label]” // [male terminalia on a microslide attached to a pinned plastic stripe]” // “HOLO- / TYPE” [printed in black on a rounded label with red border]” // “Bariloche. / 1.xii.1926.” // “ Argentina: / Terr. Río Negro. / F. & M. Edwards / B.M. 1927–63.” // “BMNH(E) # / 257679”. The holotype is in excellent condition. The paratype collection numbers are BMNH(E) # 257680-708 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Echinopodium Freeman
Amorim, Dalton De Souza & Oliveira, Sarah Siqueira 2013 |
Echinopodium
Freeman, P. 1951: 45 |
E. curvispina
Freeman, P. 1951: 47 |
E. digitalis
Duret, J. P. 1974: 98 |
Freeman, P. 1951: 47 |
E. flagellatum
Duret, J. P. 1974: 98 |
Freeman, P. 1951: 48 |
E. nigricoxa
Freeman, P. 1951: 42 |