Elmomorphus striatellus Delève, 1968
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.957.2651 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9957F2DF-3F31-4B58-84BC-2F8E0F45C6E3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13798987 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038B5001-DA1C-E757-FDAC-FE01FD7F27E8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Elmomorphus striatellus Delève, 1968 |
status |
|
Elmomorphus striatellus Delève, 1968
Figs 6–7 View Fig View Fig , 12A View Fig , 107A View Fig , 108A View Fig
Elmomorphus striatellus Delève, 1968: 150–151 (original description; figure).
Differential diagnosis
Elmomorphus striatellus ( Fig. 6 View Fig ) is characterised by having the dorsal surface covered with plastron, except for a narrow area along the posterior pronotal margin. The presence of plastron on the prosternal process is also a characteristic feature. Each elytron possesses nine shallow longitudinal striae. Phallobase and parameres are rather short and robust ( Fig. 7 View Fig ). Proximal and distal part of bursa copulatrix with sclerotised spines ( Fig. 12A View Fig ).
This species most closely resembles E. siamensis sp. nov., but it differs from the latter in the presence of elytral striae and the larger size, TL: ♂♂ 3.36–3.84 mm (3.53 ± 0.16, n= 10), ♀♀ 3.41–3.77 mm (3.54 ± 0.12, n =10) versus TL: ♂♂ 2.73–3.20 mm (3.00± 0.16, n= 10), ♀♀ 2.78–3.25 mm (2.99 ± 0.14, n= 10) in E. siamensis ; the parameres are distinctly broader, with broadly rounded apices; the phallobase is shorter and wider ( Fig. 7 View Fig ); the bursa copulatrix has distinctly fewer spines ( Fig. 12A View Fig ).
Type material
Holotype
VIETNAM • ♂; “ ♂ | VIETNAM, Prov. Nghe-An, forestière Quy-shâu , à la lumière | forêt pluv. trop. semidecid., 24.VIII.1963, T. PÓCS | Holotypus 1967 Elmomorphus striatellus Delève [white label with red margins] | Holotype [red label] | J. Delève det. 1967 Elmomorphus striatellus n. sp. | Elmomorphus striatellus Deleve ”; HNHM.
Paratype
VIETNAM • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype; “ ♀ ”; “Paratypus 1967 Elmomorphus striatellus Delève ”; HNHM.
Additional material examined
LAOS – Nam Ngang Province • 2 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; “LAOS-CE, 1-18.v.2001, Boli Kham Xai prov. , 18°21′N 105°08′E BAN NAPE (8 km NE), ~ 600m, C.L.Peša leg.”; CKB, NMW GoogleMaps .
VIETNAM – Hoa Binh Province • 1 ex.; “Vietnam, Hoa Binh, 4.-7. 6. 1986 Ha Son Binh prov . [today: Hoa Binh Province] lgt. J. Rybníček ”; CKB. – Lao Cai Province • 8 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀, 6 ex.; “N-VIETNAM 1991 Sapa (Lao Cai) leg. E. Jendek | 26.5.-10.6., 22°20′N 103°50′E ”; CKB, NMW GoogleMaps • 2 ex.: “N VIETNAM 5. 1991 SA PA, 1200 m Hong Lien Sond D. T. TU leg.”; CKB, NMW. – Ninh Binh Province • 5 ex.; “N-VIETNAM 1991 Cuc-Phuong Nationalpark | 2.-12.V. 400 km S Hanoi leg. Jendek ”; CKB, NMW • 2 ♀♀; “ VIETNAM Cuc Phuong 2.-11.V.91 Strnad Jan lgt.”; CKB • 1 ex.; “ N-VIETNAM, Cuc Phuong NP , N20° 17.572′ E105° 40.052′, 270m, 22.5. – 24.5.2015, leg. A. Skale ”; NME GoogleMaps • 1 ex.; “ N-VIETNAM, P: Nin Binh 90 Km SW Hanoi Cuc Phuong NP env. centre 07.V.2017, 270 m, 21°17′572″N, 105°40′052″E, leg. A. Weigel LFF [light trap] primary forest”; CWW. GoogleMaps – Thua Thien Hue Province • 22 ex.; “ VIETNAM, Thua Thien Hue Pr., Phong Điền Distr ., Phong Mỹ , 16°31′15.3″N, 107°15′00.3″E, 27 m a.s.l., 18.11.2022, Selnekovič & Kodada leg. (15)”; CKB. GoogleMaps – Vinh Phúc Province • 3 ♀♀; “NORTH VIETNAM Pr. VINH PHU [C], TAM DAO 5.- 25.5.1990 O. ŠAUŠA LGT.”; CKB GoogleMaps • 2 ex.; “ N-VIETNAM: Thai Ngayen Prov. [Vinh Phúc Province], vic.[inity of] Ngoc Thanh, Me Linh ( IEBR [Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources] station) 21°23′3″N 105°42′44″E 60-80m, 12.V.2012 leg. A. Skale ”; NME GoogleMaps • 6 ex.; “N- VIETNAM, P: Tai Nguyen [Vinh Phúc Province], vic. Ngoc Than, Me Linh ( IEBR station) 13.V.2017, 21°23′3″N, 105°42′44″E, 65 m NN leg. A. Weigel LFF”; CWW. GoogleMaps – Yen Bai Province • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; “ VIETNAM NORTH, YEN BAI, 6.-25. 5. 1990 O ŠAUŠA LGT.”; CKB GoogleMaps • 2 ex.; “N VIETNAM (Tonkin) pr. Hoang Lien Son YEN BAI 10.V.1990 P. Pacholátko leg.”; CKB, NMW. – Thua Thien Hue Province • 9 ex.; “ C-VIETNAM, Thừa Thiên-Huế Pr . ca. 30km W Huế , River valley 16°17′59″N, 107°20′22″E, 80m 10.V.2019, leg. A. Skale, LF [light trap]”; NME GoogleMaps • 4 ex.; “ C-VIETNAM, Thua Thien-Hue Prov. ca. 30 km W Hue , 80 m, 16°17′59″N 107°20′22″E, 10.V.2019, by light river valley leg. A. Weigel ”; CWW GoogleMaps • 2 ex.; same collection data as for preceding, but different label: “C- VIETNAM, Thua Thien-Hue, ca. 30 km W Hue , River valley , 80 m, LF [light trap] 16°17′59″N 107°20′22″E, 10.V.2019, leg. A. Weigel ”; CWW GoogleMaps • 6 ex.; “ C-VIETNAM, Thừa Thiên-Huế Prov., ca. 30km NW Huế , Sôn Ô Lâu River , 16°31′3″N, [1] 07°15′36″E, 30m, 11.V.2019, leg. A. Skale, LF [light trap]”; NME GoogleMaps • 4 ex.; “C- VIETNAM, Thua ThienHue ca. 30km NW Hue Son O Lau River valley, 30 m, by light 16°31′3″N 107°15′36″E, 11.V.2019, leg. A. Weigel ”; CWW GoogleMaps .
Type locality
Vietnam, Nghệ An Province, Quỳ Châu.
Redescription
Measurements (mm): TL: ♂♂ 3.36–3.84 (3.53 ± 0.16, n =10), ♀♀ 3.41–3.77 (3.54 ± 0.12, n=10); PL: ♂♂ 0.70–0.85 (0.78 ± 0.04, n =10), ♀♀ 0.72–0.85 (0.77± 0.04, n=10); PW: ♂♂ 1.33–1.50 (1.39 ± 0.05, n =10), ♀♀ 1.37–1.47 (1.41 ±0.03, n =10); EL: ♂♂ 2.60–2.99 (2.75± 0.12, n =10), ♀♀ 2.70–2.93 (2.77 ±0.08, n=10); EW: ♂♂ 1.56–1.76 (1.66± 0.07, n= 10), ♀♀ 1.63–1.79 (1.69± 0.05, n= 10); PhL: 0.53–0.62 (0.59 ± 0.03, n=10); PrL: 0.35–0.40 (0.38 ± 0.02, n=10).
Body ovate ( Fig. 6 View Fig ), widest behind midlength of elytra, strongly convex dorsally, highest point in anterior third of elytra. Colouration black, except for reddish brown mouthparts, trochanters and tarsi. Pubescence on dorsal surface consists of short thin decumbent yellowish setae arising from small round setiferous punctures. Plastron present on entire cranial surface, on pronotum, except for narrow transverse area before scutellum, and on entire elytral surface. Plastron present on entire ventral surface, except for median keel of prosternal process and median part of metaventrite.
Cranial surface entirely covered with plastron; round setiferous punctures separated by ca 0.5× puncture diameter, each puncture ca 0.75 × as wide as an eye facet. Labrum transverse, anterior margin straight, anterolateral angles rounded; exposed part microreticulate, with small setiferous punctures; setae short, decumbent, similar in both sexes. Clypeus with straight anterior margin, with a row of short thin setae. Eyes large, oval, moderately protruding; ID: ♂♂ 0.42–0.49 mm (0.45± 0.02, n= 10), ♀♀ 0.43–0.48 mm (0.45 ± 0.02, n=10). Antennae short, 11-segmented, densely covered with setae.
Pronotum transverse, widest at base, moderately convex, PW/PL: ♂♂ 1.69–1.93 (1.84± 0.07, n=10), ♀♀ 1.69–1.93 (1.84 ± 0.07, n= 10); surface entirely covered with plastron, except for narrow transverse area before scutellum; round setiferous punctures as wide as those on cranium, separated by ca 1–2 × puncture diameters; anterolateral pronotal angles moderately deflexed, produced and acute; lateral sides weakly curved in the middle. Prosternal process covered with plastron, except on median keel; lateral and posterior margins rounded; lateral parts raised, without clusters of long setae in males; median keel strongly arcuate. Scutellum longer than wide, smooth, with several setiferous punctures. Metaventrite covered with plastron, except for narrow, posteriorly narrowed median part; disc flat, without clusters of long setae in males; lateral sides of metaventral process raised. Elytra ovate, convex, widest around middle, lateral sides regularly rounded; EL/EW: ♂♂ 1.58–1.71 (1.66± 0.05, n =10), ♀♀ 1.60–1.68 (1.64 ± 0.03, n=10); surface entirely covered with plastron; each elytron with nine shallow striae; small, round setiferous punctures scattered over entire surface. Tibiae straight; male protibia slightly longer than tarsus; PTL/PL: ♂♂ 1.06–1.23 (1.15± 0.05, n =10), ♀♀ 1.09–1.34 (1.20 ±0.06, n=10). Terminal tarsomere in male foreleg ca 1.25 × as long as all preceding segments combined; foreclaws similar in both sexes, narrow and strongly curved.
Ventrites entirely covered with plastron. Lateral margins of intercoxal process flat; admedian keels absent. Ventrite 5 evenly convex, apex narrowly truncate in both sexes; females with indistinct longitudinal keel at apex. Aedeagus ( Fig. 7 View Fig ): phallobase short and robust, PhL/PrL: 1.38–1.67 (1.55 ±0.10, n=10); parameres wide in lateral aspect, apices broadly rounded; penis long, almost reaching apex of parameres, apex narrowly rounded; sclerotised fibula long and slender. Proximal and distal part of bursa copulatrix with few large spines ( Fig. 12A View Fig ).
Secondary sexual dimorphism
Average body dimensions similar in both sexes. Females can be distinguished by the presence of a small, hardly discernible longitudinal subapical keel on ventrite 5.
Distribution
Laos (first record), Vietnam ( Fig. 108A View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Elmomorphus striatellus Delève, 1968
Selnekovič, Dávid, Jäch, Manfred A. & Kodada, Ján 2024 |
Elmomorphus striatellus Delève, 1968: 150–151
Deleve J. 1968: 151 |