Entedonomphale dei (Girault, 1922) Triapitsyn, 2005

Triapitsyn, Serguei V., 2005, Revision of Ceranisus and the related thrips-attacking entedonine genera (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) of the world, African Invertebrates 46, pp. 261-315 : 280-281

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7909932

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7910393

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A2587D3-FFB7-1D2B-FE71-13E2FEE52460

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Entedonomphale dei (Girault, 1922)
status

comb. nov.

Entedonomphale dei (Girault, 1922) View in CoL , comb. n.

Figs 24, 25 View Figs 24, 25

Pirenoidea dei Girault, 1922: 107 View in CoL , 108. (Type locality: Brisbane , Queensland, Australia)

Pirenoidea dei Girault View in CoL : Dahms, 1983: 215.

Entedonastichus dei (Girault) View in CoL : Boucek 1988: 733; Loomans & van Lenteren 1995: 146–148, 197.

Diagnosis: Female. Head and mesosoma brown to dark brown and smooth, metasoma brown, antenna and legs pale to light brown. Antenna ( Fig. 24 View Figs 24, 25 ) attached just below lower ocular line, with scape expanded in basal half, sharply narrowing toward apex; F1 and F2 appressed, notably wider than long, F2 wider than F1; clava oval, with several sensilla. Notauli indistinct, opposite to what was stated in the original description of Pirenoidea by Girault (1922). Forewing disc with a few scattered setae behind marginal vein but more or less evenly setose beyond venation (setae very short), slightly infumated behind stigmal and marginal veins (dark spot not reaching wing’s posterior margin or base of marginal vein); longest marginal setae 1/2–3/5 maximal width of forewing ( Fig. 25 View Figs 24, 25 ). Disc of hind wing hyaline. Ovipositor short, barely exserted.

Male. Unknown.

Type material examined: Holotype female [ QMBA], apparently invalidly designated by Boucek (1988) as a lectotype (there is no reason whatsoever to believe that A.A. Girault described this species from more than one specimen), label data as follows: 1. “ Holotype T.8734 E.C.D.”; 2. “ Pirenoidea dei Gir. ^ type Clayfield Brisbane Sweeping herbage 8.4.13. H. Hacker ”.According to Dahms (1983), the second part of the second label refers to the male encyrtid mounted on the same slide under a different coverslip.The holotype specimen is in poor condition, broken into many parts, as follows: 4 broken off legs, clava, pedicel with F1, F2, head with right antenna, metasoma with left forewing, 2 legs (middle and hind).

Other material examined: AUSTRALIA: Queensland: Mt Glorious , 21.x.1982 – 13.i.1983, A. Hiller, 1^ [ QMBA] . NEW ZEALAND: Roaring Meg , 13.i.1981, J.S. Noyes, E.W. Valentine, 1^ (det. Z. Boucek) [ BMNH] .

Distribution: Australia (Queensland) and New Zealand.

Hosts: Unknown.

Comments: I was not able to find the voucher specimens of the species reported by Goodwin and Steiner (1996) from the Australian states of New South Wales and Northern Territory as E.? dei .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Eulophidae

Genus

Entedonomphale

Loc

Entedonomphale dei (Girault, 1922)

Triapitsyn, Serguei V. 2005
2005
Loc

Pirenoidea dei

DAHMS, E. C. 1983: 215
1983
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF