Entedonomphale lermontovi, S. Triapitsyn, 2005
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7909932 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7910399 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6A2587D3-FFB1-1D28-FE29-16FAFC0A27F8 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Entedonomphale lermontovi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Entedonomphale lermontovi View in CoL sp. n.
Figs 28, 29 View Figs 28, 29
Etymology: This species is named after Russian poet Mikhail Yu. Lermontov.
Diagnosis: This species can be easily recognised by its light brown body and a narrow forewing (length/width ratio about 3.7:1).
Description: Female (holotype and paratype). Body and appendages mostly light brown, with some brown on middle and hind tibiae and metasomal terga.
Vertexal suture faint and indistinct.Antenna ( Fig. 28 View Figs 28, 29 ) with scape slender, about 5.8 x as long as wide; F1 a little longer than wide, F2 slightly wider than long, each with 1 sensillum; clava longer than funicle, about 2.4 x as long as wide, with several sensilla.
Mesosoma markedly shorter than metasoma, almost smooth. Midlobe of mesoscutum with 2 pairs of setae; anterior margin of scutellum slightly angulate. Forewing ( Fig. 29 View Figs 28, 29 ) about 3.7 x as long as wide; longest marginal setae about 0.5 x maximal forewing width; disc with slight brown pigmentation behind marginal (its distal half only) and stigmal veins, more or less evenly setose in apical half of forewing. Hind wing about 7.5 x as long as wide, with disc hyaline; longest marginal setae about 1.5 x hind wing width. Hind coxa lightly sculptured.
Petiole conspicuous, much longer than wide. Ovipositor short, occupying about 2/5 length of gaster, not exserted; ovipositor length/metatibia length ratio about 1.1:1.
Measurements (n=1, holotype). Body: 1439. Antenna: scape: 176; pedicel: 58; F1: 35; F2: 31; clava: 115. Forewing: 787/212; longest marginal seta: 112. Hind wing: 576/76; longest marginal seta: 118. Ovipositor: 291.
Male. Unknown.
Holotype: Female on slide, labelled: 1. “ S. Africa: Trans. [Transvaal, South Africa], 15 km E. Klaserie, Guernsey Farm, 19–31.xii.1985, M. Sanborne CNCI”; 2. (red) “ Entedonomphale lermontovi S. Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ^” [ SANC].
Paratype: 1^ on slide [ CNCI], labelled: “S.A.K.N.P. [ Kruger National Park , South Africa], Skukuza, XII-12–15.1985, yellow M. Sanborne mal.” .
Hosts: Unknown.
Comments: The holotype is mounted laterally. The metasoma of the paratype specimen is missing. In addition to the holotype and paratype specimens, there is a point in CNCI, labelled same as the holotype of E. lermontovi sp. n., which has only a forewing and a leg glued onto it; these remains of a specimen apparently belong to this species. For obvious reasons that specimen is not included in the type series.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.