Eocanites ruani Bartzsch, Korn & Weyer, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.882.2177 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:67C909E4-C700-4F8D-B8CE-5FD9B2C5D549 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8187609 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA5C14-CAC8-858C-FDCE-FBC6FC028680 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eocanites ruani Bartzsch, Korn & Weyer, 2003 |
status |
|
Eocanites ruani Bartzsch, Korn & Weyer, 2003
Figs 117–118 View Fig View Fig
Eocanites ruani Bartzsch, Korn & Weyer, 2003: 8 , text-figs 1–2.
Gattendorfia nodosa Schmidt, 1925: 536 , pl. 19 fig. 10, pl. 23 fig. 3.
Protocanites nodosus – Vöhringer 1960: 169, pl. 6 fig. 1b, text-fig. 44a.
Eocanites nodosus – Korn & Feist 2007: 108, text-fig. 6f.
non Eocanites ruani Becker & Weyer 2004: 8 , text-fig. 17.
Diagnosis
Species of the genus Eocanites with a conch reaching 50 mm diameter. Conch at 12 mm dm evolute (uw/dm ~0.50) with weakly depressed whorl profile (ww/wh ~1.05) and broadly rounded venter; conch at 30 mm dm evolute (uw/dm ~0.50) with weakly compressed whorl profile (ww/wh ~0.95) and flat or weakly concave venter. Ornament with moderately coarse, strongly rursiradiate, biconvex growth lines with deep ventral sinus. With low, rounded crescent-shaped ventrolateral ribs and nodes.
Material examined
Holotype
GERMANY • Thuringian Mountains, Saalfeld, Pfaffenberg SW quarry; Pfaffenberg Member of the Gleitsch Formation, bed 4; Bartzsch & Weyer 1974 Coll.; illustrated by Bartzsch et al. (2003: text-fig. 1.1) and Korn (2006: text-fig. 4i); MB.C.5360.1.
Paratypes
GERMANY • 10 specimens; Thuringian Mountains , Saalfeld, Pfaffenberg SW quarry; Pfaffenberg Member of the Gleitsch Formation, bed 4; Bartzsch & Weyer 1967–1976 Coll.; MB.C.5360.2–
MB.C.5360.9, MB.C.5361, MB.C.5362.1 • 1 specimen; Thuringian Mountains, Saalfeld, Pfaffenberg SW quarry; Pfaffenberg Member of the Gleitsch Formation, bed 4; Riedel Coll.; MB.C.5362.2.
Additional material
GERMANY • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberrödinghausen, railway cutting; Hangenberg Limestone, bed 4; Vöhringer Coll.; GPIT-PV-63970 • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberrödinghausen, railway cutting; Hangenberg Limestone, bed 5; Vöhringer Coll.; GPIT-PV-64001 • 3 specimens; Rhenish Mountains , Oberrödinghausen, railway cutting; Hangenberg Limestone, bed 4a; Weyer 1993–1994 Coll.; MB.C.31228.1–3 • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberrödinghausen, railway cutting; Hangenberg Limestone, bed 5a1; Weyer 1993–1994 Coll.; MB.C.31229 • 2 specimens; Rhenish Mountains , Oberrödinghausen, railway cutting; Hangenberg Limestone, bed 5a2; Weyer 1993–1994 Coll.; MB.C.31230.1–2 • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberrödinghausen, railway cutting; Hangenberg Limestone, bed 5b; Weyer 1993–1994 Coll.; MB.C.31231 • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Drewer; Hangenberg Limestone; Schmidt Coll.; GZG.INV.1690 .
Description
Specimen MB.C.31229 is a small fragment, but it clearly shows the characteristic features of the species ( Fig. 117B View Fig ). At 9 mm whorl height, the profile has almost equal width and height, but the flanks converge to the flattened, slightly concave venter. The specimen shows crescent-shaped ribs on the outer flank; these ribs form blunt nodes on the ventrolateral shoulder.
The transition to the adult stage can also be followed in the sectioned specimen GPIT-PV-63970; the almost circular juvenile whorl profile has developed a concave venter at 8 mm whorl height ( Fig. 118A View Fig ). The ontogenetic trajectories of the cardinal conch parameters are rather simple, at least to a conch diameter of 9 mm ( Fig. 118 View Fig C-E).
The fragment of the larger specimen GPIT-PV-64001 represents the adult stage with flat venter and ribs on the flank, which turn into short nodes near the ventrolateral shoulder ( Fig. 117A View Fig ).
Remarks
Specimens of Eocanites ruani were considered by Schmidt (1925), Vöhringer (1960) and Korn (1994) as adult stages of E. nodosus . However, E. nodosus has a much finer ornament with coarse growth lines formed on the entire flank and venter; furthermore, ribs, nodes and a concave venter are not known from E. nodosus .
Eocanites ruani can be easily distinguished from almost all other Central European species of the genus by the concave venter and the characteristic crescent-shaped ribs on the outer half of the flank. Eocanites ruani is so far apparently the only representative of the genus from the lower part of the Gattendorfia stage.
Of the species of Eocanites described from Guizhou, E. holcoventrus and E. robustus have a concave venter, but both species have an almost square-shaped whorl profile. Furthermore, E. holcoventrus has no ribs and E. robustus has sigmoidally curved ribs on the flank.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SubOrder |
Prolecanitina |
SuperFamily |
Prolecanitoidea |
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Prolecanitinae |
Genus |
Eocanites ruani Bartzsch, Korn & Weyer, 2003
Korn, Dieter & Weyer, Dieter 2023 |
Eocanites nodosus
Korn D. & Feist R. 2007: 108 |
Eocanites ruani
Becker R. T. & Weyer D. 2004: 8 |
Eocanites ruani
Bartzsch K. & Korn D. & Weyer D. 2003: 8 |
Protocanites nodosus
Vohringer E. 1960: 169 |
Gattendorfia nodosa
Schmidt H. 1925: 536 |