Eocenomyrma electrina, Dlussky & Radchenko, 2006

Dlussky, Gennady & Radchenko, Alexander, 2006, A new ant genus from the late Eocene European amber, Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 51 (3), pp. 561-567 : 564

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13651933

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13651953

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F1ED0B-FFF7-FFFC-2334-FA67B8C2F891

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Eocenomyrma electrina
status

sp. nov.

Eocenomyrma electrina sp. nov.

Fig. 2 View Fig ; Tables 1, 2.

Derivation of the name: After Latin electrum —amber.

Holotype: ZMUC 328 View Materials , worker, complete specimen, leg. G.V. Henningsen, 16/5−1956.

Locality and horizon: Scandinavian Amber, late Eocene.

Diagnosis.—Total length ca. 3 mm. The new species is characterised by the following apomorphies: frontal carinae are short, quite strongly curved and merge with rugae, which surround antennal sockets, frons not very wide, but frontal lobes quite big and extended laterally; mesosoma short and robust, not constricted behind so that propodeum not much narrower than promesonotum, metanotal groove distinct, though not deep (seen in profile), promesonotum (seen from above) with weak but distinct promesonotal suture; propodeal spines of moderate length, wide and stout, rather blunt, slightly curved downwards, directed mainly backward and feebly divergent (seen from above); petiole only slightly longer than high, with distinct but not very long peduncle, petiolar node with rounded dorsum, without dorsal plate; lower (anterior) part of frons with not coarse longitudinal rugae, remainder part of head dorsum with longitudinal rugosity and reticulation; mesosoma with coarse reticulation, petiole and postpetiole with not coarse longitudinal rugae.

Eocenomyrma electrina differs from the all known Eocenomyrma species by its relatively short and robust mesosoma (AI 1.80 versus> 2.30 in other species) and much shorter petiole (PI 1.27 versus> 1.55 in other species). Additionally, it differs from E. elegantula by the body sculpture (see below); from E. rugosostriata it differs by the reticulated mesosoma, by the distinctly narrower frons (FI 0.39 versus 0.48–0.52), by the much more extended frontal lobes (FLI 1.24 versus 1.10–1.14), by the longer antennal scape (SI 1 0.71 versus 0.59), by reticulated sculpture of the mesosoma, by the smaller body size; for the differences between E. electrina and E. orthospina see above.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Formicidae

Genus

Eocenomyrma

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF