Eupathocera zethi Benda & Straka, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/jhr.97.127500 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F340D011-940A-47BB-9A5B-78D9B3DE1833 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13737003 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8AD765DD-069C-44E2-BAAA-46020E29AC56 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:8AD765DD-069C-44E2-BAAA-46020E29AC56 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Eupathocera zethi Benda & Straka |
status |
sp. nov. |
Eupathocera zethi Benda & Straka sp. nov.
Type material.
Holotype • French Guiana: 1 ♀; Cayenne, Roura env., 18 Oct. 2015; Naoki Ogawa leg.; NMPC; host: Zethus brasiliensis fuscatus R. Bohart & Stange, 1965 .
Paratypes • French Guiana: 1 ♀; same host specimen (collection data) as for holotype, 18 Oct. 2015; Naoki Ogawa leg.; YNPC ; 1 ♀ + 1 empty male puparium (EMP), 2 ♀; 35 km S of Roura, Relais de Patawa , 16 July 2000; Ji. Kadlec leg.; OLML; same host species as holotype ; 1 ♀; NE Mount de Kaw Fourgassie , 5. Aug. 2006; M. Snížek; OLML; same host species as holotype .
Diagnosis of female cephalothorax.
This species is diagnosed by a combination of characters. It differs from all remaining species of Eupathocera by the presence of very conspicuously imprinted mesal furrows indicating the pro-mesothoracic and meso-metathoracic borders on the ventral side (sbpm, sbmm; Figs 1 C View Figure 1 , 2 A View Figure 2 ), and inconspicuous mandibles fused with the labial area and bearing a rounded (not distinctly raised) mandibular bulge (mdb; Fig. 3 E View Figure 3 ). The clypeal surface is completely smooth with distinctly exposed sensilla, in contrast to Eupathocera luctuosae Pierce, 1911 and E. insularis (Kifune, 1983) , which display a wrinkled, lamellar clypeal area, with scarcely visible sensilla. The number of clypeal sensilla is very high in the new species, more than 60. A larger number occurs only in species utilising Sphex L., 1758 – Eupathocera fuliginosi (Brethes, 1923) (more than 60) and E. westwoodi (Templeton, 1841) (more than 80). The border between the clypeal area and frontal region is indistinct in comparison to Eupathocera luctuosae Pierce, 1911 and E. insularis (Kifune, 1983) where it is clearly recognisable.
Description of female cephalothorax.
Shape and colouration. Size of holotype cephalothorax: length 1.8 mm, width 1.74 mm; slightly variable, as long as wide or slightly wider than long, length 1.78–2.03 mm, width 1.74–1.83 mm. Abdominal segment I not protruding laterally, corner below spiracles rounded. Anterior head margin rounded, not protruding from head capsule. Thorax slightly widening posteriorly. Colouration of cephalothorax mostly dark with light brown pattern on ventral side, but mostly light brown dorsomedially with specific contrast pattern.
Head capsule. Approximately ⅓ as long as entire cephalothorax including lateral extensions. Colouration mostly dark with specific pattern with paler lateral extensions, mandibular bases and ventral labral field. Clypeal area distinctly delimited from labral area. Clypeal lobe rather indistinct but visible. Clypeal surface completely smooth with distinctly exposed sensilla. Number of clypeal sensilla slightly over 60. Border between clypeal and frontal region indistinct but still present. Frontal region smooth or very slightly wrinkled (fr, Fig. 2 F View Figure 2 ). Segmental border between head and prothorax indicated by dark transverse stripe on dorsal side (sbhp, Fig. 1 D View Figure 1 ), in SEM pictures visible by change in cuticular sculpture (sbhp, Fig. 3 B View Figure 3 ). Head and prothorax distinctly separated by birth opening ventromedially (bo, Fig. 3 A View Figure 3 ) and laterally by suture (sbhp, Fig. 3 A View Figure 3 ).
Supra - antennal sensillary field. Smooth or very slightly wrinkled, with dispersed sensilla (Fig. 2 C, D View Figure 2 ). Not distinctly delimited by furrow medially, but border marked by different surface structure of supra-antennal sensillary field and smooth frontal region (Fig. 3 B View Figure 3 ).
Antenna. Vestigial antenna bulging, preserved as more or less clearly defined area, with distinct plates (pra, Fig. 2 C, D View Figure 2 ). Antennal torulus reduced (Fig. 2 C, D View Figure 2 ). Periantennal area expanded, smooth (paa, Fig. 2 C, D View Figure 2 ). Distance between antennal area and supra-antennal sensillary field relatively large.
Labrum. Ventral field wider than long, elliptic, completely smooth, shiny, and pale, contrasting with dark dorsal labral field and labium. Dorsal labral field slightly arcuate, 5 × wider than long in midline. Setae on dorsal field blunt, sensilla-like, spines lacking.
Mandible. Anteromedially directed at an angle of 30 °, enclosed in mandibular capsule. Mandibular bulge not distinctly raised, rounded, with several inconspicuous sensilla. Cuticle of mandible smooth posteriorly, with longitudinal grooves dorsolaterally (md; Fig. 3 E, F View Figure 3 ). Mandibular tooth narrow, anteriorly oriented, with or without spines (mdt; Fig. 3 E, F View Figure 3 ).
Maxilla. Distinctly reduced and only very slightly protruding, not projecting beyond mandible anteriorly. Partially fused to labial area, both regions not clearly separated. Cuticle reticulated, with smooth areas, not distinctly wrinkled (mx; Fig. 3 E, F View Figure 3 ). Vestige of palp inconspicuous, forming small bulge with impression, located medially on ventral side of maxilla. Submaxillary groove indistinctly produced posterolaterally towards maxillary base.
Labium. Labial area not distinctly recognisable between maxillae, flat, slightly longer than wide in midline (lb; Fig. 3 C View Figure 3 ). Anteriorly delimited by mouth opening, posteriorly by birth opening. Cuticular surface very slightly reticulated.
Mouth opening. Slightly arcuate, sclerotised along margin (os; Fig. 3 C View Figure 3 ).
Thorax. Pro-mesothoracic and meso-metathoracic borders distinct on ventral side, separated by mesal furrows (sbpm, sbmm; Figs 1 C View Figure 1 , 2 A View Figure 2 ). On dorsal side separated by less conspicuous dark mesal furrows (sbpm, sbmm; Figs 1 D View Figure 1 , 2 B View Figure 2 ). Border between metathorax and abdomen marked by change in cuticular surface structure or pigmentation. Cuticle of thoracic segments reticulate on ventral side, often with scattered small papillae. Dorsal side of thorax predominantly smooth, only slightly wrinkled. Prosternal extension undifferentiated. Prosternum bulging, distinctly elevated above head medially and laterally (pst; Fig. 3 A View Figure 3 ). Shape of meso- and metathorax unmodified, transverse. Prosternum and mesosternum on ventral side with dark colouration, but metasternum medially pale. All thoracic segments pale on dorsal side, but dark laterally.
Abdominal segment I and spiracles. Setae and cuticular spines present on lateral region of abdominal segment I (Fig. 2 E View Figure 2 ). Spiracles on posterior ~ ⅓ of cephalothorax slightly elevated, with anterolateral or anterodorsal orientation. Cephalothoracic part of abdominal segment I below spiracles dark on dorsal side, medially paler on ventral side (asI; Figs 1 C View Figure 1 , 2 A View Figure 2 ).
Etymology.
The name refers to the host genus Zethus . From Greek Zethus – the son of Zeus in ancient Greek mythology. Adjective.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |