Evopharciceras formosum, Korn & Bockwinkel, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.771.1503 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9FAB6919-E4AC-44A6-89AB-2E236F55FDB5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5536119 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F58EF052-3ED6-4798-81FC-D782A0CC08BF |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F58EF052-3ED6-4798-81FC-D782A0CC08BF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Evopharciceras formosum |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
Evopharciceras formosum gen. et sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F58EF052-3ED6-4798-81FC-D782A0CC08BF
Figs 28–29 View Fig View Fig ; Tables 15–16 View Table 15 View Table 16
Diagnosis
Evopharciceras gen. nov. with thinly discoidal, evolute conch at 35 mm dm (ww / dm ~ 0.35; uw/ dm ~0.50) and extremely discoidal, evolute conch at 65 mm dm (ww /dm ~ 0.30; uw/ dm ~0.50). Whorl profile weakly depressed with convergent flanks and broadly rounded venter, umbilical wall steep. Growth lines rather coarse, strongly biconvex; ventrolateral shoulder with two spiral grooves in the middle growth stage. Outer suture line with high median saddle, symmetric, lanceolate prongs of the external lobe, a lanceolate, weakly pouched lateral lobe, a very narrow, acute and small U 2 lobe and a V-shaped U 4 lobe.
Etymology
Named after the Latin ‘ formosum ’, meaning ‘beautiful’, because of the decorated shell.
Material examined
Holotype GERMANY • Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld (Grube Beilstein); late Givetian (Red Ironstone); Lotz 1901–1902 Coll.; MB.C.30241 . ( Fig. 28A View Fig )
Paratype GERMANY • 1 specimen; Rhenish Mountains , Oberscheld (Grube Anna); late Givetian (Red Ironstone); Koch Coll.; MB.C.22173 .
Description
Paratype MB.C.22173: Laterally deformed, but otherwise well-preserved specimen with 35 mm conch diameter in iron-rich micritic limestone. Most of the specimen is covered with shell; a quarter of the last volution belongs to the body chamber ( Fig. 28B View Fig ). It has a discoidal and evolute conch with low coiling rate ( Fig. 28B View Fig ); the whorl profile is subcircular with shallow umbilical wall, broadly rounded flanks and a broadly rounded venter. One faint ventrolateral spiral groove on each side separates flanks and venter. The ornament includes lamellar growth lines, which extend with low dorsolateral projection on the umbilical margin, a shallow lateral sinus, a prominent, narrow ventrolateral projection and a deep ventral sinus.
The larger holotype MB.C.30241 is a laterally strongly deformed specimen with about 65 mm conch diameter in haematitic limestone, showing the suture line ( Fig. 28A View Fig ). It has a similar conch geometry, but is slightly slenderer. It displays the suture line, which has a rather narrow external lobe with high median saddle and narrow and slightly pouched, lanceolate prongs. The lateral lobe is also very narrow and lanceolate; the U 2 lobe is very narrow and the U 4 lobe is V-shaped and wider than the U 2 lobe ( Fig. 29A View Fig ).
Remarks
Evopharciceras formosum gen. et sp. nov. is similar to Extropharciceras metallicum sp. nov. but differs in the slightly stouter conch and the slightly narrower umbilicus. The suture line provides more specific criteria for the separation of the two species: while the E 2, L and U 2 lobes are very narrow and lanceolate in Evopharciceras gen. nov., they are wider and tongue- or V-shaped in Extropharciceras .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |