Fringilla coelebs ombriosa Hartert, 1913
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/832.1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4627584 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/2B4687A0-9E3E-FFF7-FD6F-7100FE4C1400 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Fringilla coelebs ombriosa Hartert |
status |
|
Fringilla coelebs ombriosa Hartert View in CoL
Fringilla coelebs ombriosa Hartert, 1913: 78 View in CoL (Island of Hierro (Ferro)).
Now Fringilla coelebs ombriosa Hartert, 1913 View in CoL . See Vaurie, 1959: 593; Mayr, 1968: 202; Dickinson, 2003: 746; Fry and Keith, 2004: 453; and Clement, 2010: 513–514.
HOLOTYPE: AMNH 709989 About AMNH , adult male, collected on Hierro Island , 27.45N, 18.00W (Times atlas), Canary Islands, Spain, on 16 February 1903, by Captain Polatzek. From the Rothschild Collection. GoogleMaps
COMMENTS: In the original description, Hartert designated as type a male specimen collected by Polatzek on Hierro Island on 16
February 1903; the above specimen is the only male specimen collected on that date. Hartert did not say how many specimens he examined. The following eight specimens came to AMNH with the Rothschild Collection and are paratypes: Hierro Island, males, AMNH 709986 About AMNH , 30 January 1903, AMNH 709987 About AMNH , 26 January 1903, AMNH 709988 About AMNH , 5 February 1903, AMNH 709990 About AMNH , February 1905 ; females, AMNH 709991 About AMNH , February 1905, AMNH 709992 About AMNH , 5 February 1903, AMNH 709993 About AMNH , 12 February 1903, AMNH 709994 About AMNH , 16 February 1903 .
Fringilla spodiogenys koenigi Rothschild and Hartert Fringilla spodiogenys koenigi Rothschild and Hartert, 1893: 97 ( Marokko). Now Fringilla coelebs africana Levaillant, 1850. See Hartert, 1904a: 128; Hartert 1919a: 156; Vaurie, 1959: 593; Fry and Keith, 2004: 452– 454; and Clement, 2010: 513–514. LECTOTYPE: AMNH 709803, adult male, collected in Morocco (5 Marokko), on 5 April 1884. From the Rothschild Collection. COMMENTS: No type was designated in the original description, the authors stating that they measured four males and three females from Morocco. Rothschild and Hartert (1894: 76) later added that they had, since the description, seen additional material from Morocco, but only the original seven specimens comprise the type series. The only locality within Morocco mentioned in the original description was Tangiers (5 Tanger) in relation to the female specimens. Later, Hartert (1919a: 156), designated as lectotype the male specimen from Tangiers, collected on 5 April 1884, by Olcese, from the Bartlett Collection, ex Wilh. Schlüter. AMNH 709803 bears the Rothschild type label with the number ‘‘7167’’ (not elsewhere cited), locality of ‘‘Tanger’’ and reference to the original description; on the original label it is sexed as a male, collected 5 April 1884 in Morocco. It bears an original number ‘‘7167c’’ of unknown significance and is marked ‘‘Type’’ in hand unknown, without further information about the collector. The fact that Hartert did not cite the number ‘‘7167’’ of his intended type has led to ambiguity in this designation, as there are two males bearing the date 5 April 1884. In order to remove this ambiguity, I hereby designate Hartert’s intended type, AMNH 709803, the lectotype of Fringilla spodiogenys koenigi Rothschild and Hartert, 1893, as it has without question always been considered the type. There are six paralectotypes in AMNH, all marked as collected by Olcese: AMNH 709805, [male], Tanger, Morocco, collected 5 April 1884; AMNH 709806, male, Tanger, Moroc, no date, ‘‘3f,’’ marked ‘‘Cotype’’ by Hartert; AMNH 709807, [male], Tanger, Moroc, no date; AMNH 709808, male, Maroc, no date, ‘‘3e’’; AMNH 709810, [male], Tangiers, Morocco, no date; AMNH 709811, female, Maroc, no date, ‘‘ 3g,’’ marked ‘‘type of ♀ ’’ by Hartert. The specimens listed above as [male], bore an upside-down female symbol, and Rothschild and Hartert apparently based their designation of four males and three females on the results of their measurements. I consider all of them paralectotypes of koenigi. The information concerning the provenance of the type of koenigi, ‘‘Ex. Coll. Bartlett, ex. Wilh. Schlüter’’ ( Hartert, 1919a: 98), must have been information known to him but not appearing on any of the labels. There are two additional specimens of koenigi that came to AMNH with the Rothschild Collection: AMNH 709804 came to Rothschild from the Museum Boucard, and AMNH 709809, came to him from the Museum of Henry H. Slater. I do not consider these specimens paralectotypes.AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Molothrus |
Fringilla coelebs ombriosa Hartert
LeCroy, Mary 2013 |
Fringilla coelebs ombriosa
Fry, C. H. & S. Keith 2004: 453 |
Dickinson, E. C. 2003: 746 |
Vaurie, C. 1959: 593 |
Fringilla coelebs ombriosa
Hartert, E. 1913: 78 |