Goeldia goytacazes, Almeida-Silva & Brescovit, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5428.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E438D8DA-B142-4A0C-BA25-F6B6EC45C197 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10847406 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B86D8799-FF92-FFF5-8CDD-F946FC9F7229 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Goeldia goytacazes |
status |
sp. nov. |
Goeldia goytacazes sp. nov.
( Figs 12 View FIGURE 12 ; 27 View FIGURE 27 )
Type material. Holotype male, paratype female from Campos de Goytacazes (21°45’14”S 41°19’26”W), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 24.IX.2003, C.C.L. Teixeira coll., deposited at MCN 39868 GoogleMaps ; Paratype female with same data as holotype, deposited at MCN 43434.
Additional material examined. None.
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition in honor to the indigenous people of the Goytacazes tribe, who lived in the type locality.
Diagnosis. Goeldia goytacazes resembles G. mirim by the general shape of the male palp and epigynum ( Fig. 16 View FIGURE 16 ), but differs by the patellar apophysis pointing posteriorly ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ); by the enlarged base of the MLT ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ) and tegular process lanceolate ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ) in the male palp. The female epigynum is also similar but in G. goytacazes it covers almost completely the copulatory duct wall ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ) and the vertical spermathecae is much shorter than the copulatory duct ( Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 ).
Description. Male (Holotype). Coloration: carapace dark brown. Sternum and labium black, endites brown. Leg coxae and femora black, other leg segments yellowish brown except distal half of patella and tibia III and IV black and metatarsus IV grayish. Opisthosoma grayish brown. Total length 3.15. Carapace: lenght 1.59; width 1.16; height 0.75. Opisthosoma: length 1.65; width 1.38. Clypeus: height 0.13. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.04; ALE 0.08; PME 0.06; PLE 0.06; AME–AME 0.08; AME–ALE 0.07; PME–PME 0.1; PME–PLE 0.15; AME–PME 0.08; ALE–PLE 0.07. Chelicerae paturon: length 0.65. Leg measurements: I: femur 1.23/ patella 0.50/ tibia 1.05/ metatarsus 0.98/ tarsus 0.62/ total 4.37; II: 1.13/ 0.48/ 0.83/1.03/ 0.48/ 3.93; III: 1.05/ 0.4/ 0.93/ 0.75/ 0.34/ 3.46; IV: 1.25/ 1.20/ 0.5/ 1.06/ 0.44/ 4.45. Leg formula 4123. Leg spination: femur I pap; tibia I v1r-2(1r- 1m)- 2(1r- 1m)-0, p0-1-0, r0-1-0-1-0; III–IV: p1ap, r1ap; metatarsus I v1r-1r- 1m, p1ap, r1ap; II v1r-0-1r- 1m, p1ap, r1ap; IV v1r-1p-1map, p0-1-1ap, r1ap. Patellar apophysis pointing dorsally and posteriorly ( Fig. 12C–D View FIGURE 12 ). RLT with an extra basal fold ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ). Tegular process as in illustration ( Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ). Pars pendula thickening subdistal ( Fig. 12D View FIGURE 12 ).
Female (Paratype): Coloration as in male except, femora black, tarsus I and II reddish brown and other leg articles yellowish brown. Total length 3.84. Carapace: length 1.80; width 1.24; height 0.75. Opisthosoma: lentgth 1.24; width 1.48. Clypeus: height 1.40. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.05; ALE 0.09; PME 0.06; PLE 0.08; AME–AME 0.07; AME–ALE 0.11; PME–PME 0.10; PME–PLE 0.19; AME–PME 0.07; ALE–PLE 0.05. Chelicerae paturon: length 0.75. Leg measurements: I: femur 1.20/ patella 0.48/ tibia 1.04/ metatarsus 0.88/ tarsus 0.56/ total 4.16; II: 1.10/ 0.54/ 0.75/ 0.92/ 0.54/ 3.85; III: 1.00/ 0.52/ 0.72/ 0.74/ 0.44/ 3.42; IV: 1.48/ 1.10/ 0.48/ 0.90/ 0.42/ 4.38. Leg formula 1243. Leg spination: metatarsus II–IV v1map. Copulatory ducts almost completely covered by the median field ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ). Posterior edge of the epigynum round ( Fig. 12E View FIGURE 12 ). Apex of the copulatory ducts bent ( Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 ). Horizontal spermathecae slightly curved ( Fig. 12F View FIGURE 12 ).
Variation. Length (2♀): total 3.24–3.84; carapace 1.56–1.80; femur I 1.03–1.20.
Distribution. Only known from the type locality ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |