Harpes ” neogracilis Richter and Richter, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13175056 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13175068 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D887C9-FF88-FF83-FF96-FEB78F95FC2E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Harpes ” neogracilis Richter and Richter, 1924 |
status |
|
“ Harpes ” neogracilis Richter and Richter, 1924 View in CoL
Fig. 2K–N View Fig .
“ Harpes ” neogracilis Richter and Richter, 1924 View in CoL ; Feist and Schindler 1994: 211, pl. 4: 3–8 (see list of older synonymies therein).
Material.— Figured specimens: 2 cephala from section “2”, upper trilobite association ( UM2 − RF 219–220); additional material from same locality: 13 cephala ( UM2 − RF 221–233); from section “1”, upper trilobite association: 1 cephalon ( UM2 − RF 234), lower trilobite association: 3 cephala ( UM2 − RF 235–237) .
Remarks.—The new material is closest to the specimens from the type locality Sessacker (Rhenish Slate Mountains, Germany, described by Richter and Richter 1926). However, the brim, though flat and down−sloping distally, has perforations of equal size and there is no row of larger perforations on the inner side of the marginal border as in the material from Sessacker. The eyes are less prominent and form low ocular swellings; this feature is also developed in specimens from Coumiac, Montagne Noire ( Feist and Schindler 1994).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Harpetinae |
Genus |
Harpes ” neogracilis Richter and Richter, 1924
Feist, Raimund 2002 |
Harpes ” neogracilis
Feist, R. & Schindler, E. 1994: 211 |