Hemidactylus Oken, 1817
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.180794 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6228560 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E3DF27-FFA3-FF81-E8CD-F94CFA1DFE7F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hemidactylus Oken, 1817 |
status |
|
Key to the genus Hemidactylus Oken, 1817 from India
Modified after Smith (1935). Excludes H. mahendrai , the validity of which has been questioned (see Zug et al. 2007) but does include H. karenorum , which may not actually occur within the borders of India ( Mahony & Zug, 2008).
1a. Digits narrow or moderately dilated with undivided transverse lamellae, or with only distal lamellae divided or deeply notched........................................................................................................................2
1b. All but single terminal lamellae paired....................................................................................................6
2a. All subdigital lamellae undivided ........................................................................................ anamallensis
2b. Only distal lamellae divided or notched; free distal phalanx of each digit less than half the length of its associated subdigital pad; femoral pores absent.....................................................................................3
3a. Median subcaudal scales forming a series of transversely enlarged plates; dorsal granules small, irregu- lar, intermixed with 10 to 12 longitudinal series of more or less oval strongly keeled tubercles; dorsum with quadrangular spots ................................................................................................................ gracilis
3b. Tail venter without transversely enlarged plates.....................................................................................4
4a. Original tail clearly divided into segments; dorsum with dark reticulations .......................... reticulatus
4b. Original tail not obviously segmented; dorsum without dark reticulations............................................5
5a. Dorsal granules small, intermixed with irregularly arranged, enlarged tubercles; back and tail cross- banded with light streaks; maximum SVL 36 mm .............................................................. albofasciatus
5b. Dorsal granules small, intermixed with irregularly arranged, enlarged tubercles; back with four stripes and transversely arranged spots; maximum SVL 46 mm .......................................... sataraensis sp. nov.
6a. Digits relatively narrow; scales of dorsum uniform, imbricate, slightly elongated, striated and feebly keeled ....................................................................................................................................... scabriceps
6b. Digits moderately to broadly dilated; dorsal scales not imbricate...........................................................7
7a. Dorsum with numerous, strongly keeled, enlarged tubercles arranged in more or less regular longitudi- nal series..................................................................................................................................................8
7b. Dorsal tubercles absent or, if present, rounded, smooth, or feebly keeled, not regularly arranged......14
8a. Males with precloacal pores only............................................................................................................9
8b. Males with precloacal-femoral pores.....................................................................................................10
9a. 12–14 lamellae under the fourth toe; 9–13 precloacal pores in males ......................................... persicus
9b. 10–11 lamellae under the fourth toe; 6 precloacal pores in males .................................... porbandarensis
10a. Very large (> 100 mm SVL); subdigital lamellae in straight, transverse series 9–10 lamellae under first toe; dorsal tubercles large, trihedral, arranged in ~20 fairly longitudinal series ..................... maculatus
10b. Small to moderately sized (<85 mm SVL); subdigital lamellae in oblique series; 8 or fewer lamellae under first toe........................................................................................................................................11
11a. Dorsum with enlarged trihedral dorsal tubercles; dorsal pattern with transverse markings.................12
11b. Dorsal tubercles conical, keeled, or subtrihedral; dorsal pattern of spots or blotches..........................13
12a. 7–10 lamellae under the fourth toe; 7–8 infralabials .................................................................... triedrus
12b. 12 lamellae under the fourth toe; 10 infralabials .................................................................... subtriedrus
13a. Digits distinctly webbed at base, males with 17–20 precloacal-femoral pores on each side; dorsal pat- tern of white spots on a dark background ................................................................................... prashadi
13b. Digits not webbed, males with 7–16 precloacal-femoral pores on each side; dorsal pattern of dark spots or blotches on a pale background .................................................................................................. brookii
14a. Digit I of manus half or less the length of digit II.................................................................................15
14b. Digit I of manus more than half the length of digit II............................................................................17
15a. Tail weakly depressed, without denticulate lateral edge; male with a continuous series of 26–36 preclo- acal-femoral pores; 9–10 lamellae under fourth toe ..................................................................... frenatus
15b. Tail strongly depressed, with sharply denticulated lateral edge; males (when present) with medial inter- ruption of precloacal-femoral pore series; 11–13 lamellae under fourth toe........................................16
16a. Dorsum with uniform small granules; second postmentals do not contact infralabials; all-female species ...................................................................................................................................................... garnotii
16b. Dorsum with small granules and numerous larger rounded tubercles; second postmental contact infrala- bials; males with 18–20 precloacal-femoral pores on each side ............................................. karenorum
17a. Tail and sometimes body dorsum with enlarged tubercles ....................................................................18
17b. Dorsum and tail lacking enlarged dorsal tubercles................................................................................20
18a. Dorsal scalation of small granules, intermixed with 18–20 rows of irregularly arranged enlarged tuber- cles; 11–13 lamellae under fourth toe; 15–19 femoral pores on each side in males ............... aaronbaueri
18b. Enlarged tubercles (if present), few, scattered.......................................................................................19
19a. 9–11 lamellae under the fourth toe; 10–17 femoral pores on each side ............................... leschenaultii
19b. 11–14 lamellae under the fourth toe; 5–7 femoral pores on each side ..................................... flaviviridis
20a. 13–15 lamellae under the fourth toe; 18–22 femoral pores on each side in males; SVL to 115 mm .................................................................................................................................................................... giganteus
20b. 9–11 lamellae under fourth toe; 12–15 femoral pores on each side in males; SVL to <60 mm bowringii *
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |