Holopyga indica Mocsáry, 1889
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1290857D-36E6-47DE-81C7-70CBD7C0AE01 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4544698 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A96A8877-B42E-FFBF-64CD-F569FD818ED7 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Holopyga indica Mocsáry, 1889 |
| status |
|
( Figs 13 View FIGURE 13 A–13D)
Holopyga (Holopyga) Indica Mocsáry, 1889: 118 . Syntypes ♀; India orientalis (118 (descr.)) (HNHM).
Holopyga indica: Dalla Torre 1892: 27 (cat., India); du Buysson 1896b: 465 (cat., Central Provinces, Bangalore [= Bengaluru]), pl. I (fig. 12), pl. V (fig. 3); Bingham 1903: 421 (key), 422 (descr., India orientalis, Delhi, Rajputana, Mount Abu, fig. 149); Bischoff 1913: 13 (cat., India); Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 232 (cat., India).
Material examined. 1 ♂, Uttar Pradesh, Kawupore [= Kanpur], Anwarganj , without further data ( NHMW) ; 10 ♂, 3 ♀, Karikal, without further data ( NHMW) .
Distribution. India (Karnataka; Delhi; Rajasthan; Uttar Pradesh; India orientalis (locality not specified); Central provinces (locality not specified)).
| NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubFamily |
Chrysidinae |
|
Tribe |
Elampini |
|
Genus |
Holopyga indica Mocsáry, 1889
| Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan 2021 |
Holopyga indica:
| Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. 1991: 232 |
| Bischoff, H. 1913: 13 |
| Bingham, C. T. 1903: 421 |
| du Buysson, R. 1896: 465 |
| Dalla Torre, C. G. de 1892: 27 |
Holopyga (Holopyga) Indica Mocsáry, 1889: 118
| Mocsary, A. 1889: 118 |