Hypoxys omegoides, Nunes & Mendonça & Fernandes, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5159.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0D339FF5-003D-4ACB-90C7-40495C21C68B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6778944 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F3334CDB-0589-4EA9-832E-366E5C4227CA |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F3334CDB-0589-4EA9-832E-366E5C4227CA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hypoxys omegoides |
status |
sp. nov. |
Hypoxys omegoides sp. n.
( Figures 10A–D View FIGURE 10 , 19G–H View FIGURE 19 , 21B View FIGURE 21 )
http://zoobank.org/ urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:F3334CDB-0589-4EA9-832E-366E5C4227CA
Material examined (n=1). Holotype ♂: PERU. Cuzco. Santa Isabel, Valley of River Cosnipata , 20.XI.1951, F. Woytkowski leg. ( USNM).
Measurements. Total length: 14.4; head length: 1.8; head width: 2.9; pronotal length: 2.5; pronotal width: 8.6; scutellum length: 7.1; scutellum width: 4.8; abdominal width: 7.9; length of antennal segments. I: 0.7; II: 1.8; III: 1.1; IV: 3.8; V: missing.
Diagnosis. Anterolateral margin of pronotum with solid black stripe along less than half of its extension. Anterolateral margin not punctured dorsally. Cicatrices of pronotum with concolorous punctures delimiting anterior sulci ( Fig. 19G View FIGURE 19 ). Scutellum with anterior margin concolorous ( Fig. 19G View FIGURE 19 ). Body ventrally with brown stripes ( Fig. 19H View FIGURE 19 ). Male genitalia ( Fig. 10A–D View FIGURE 10 ). Pygophore strongly excavated laterally, leaving visible base of the paramere and superior process of the genital cup ( Fig. 10C–D View FIGURE 10 ). Dorsal rim strongly projected medially around base of proctiger; lateral angles strongly projected posteriorly, covering posterolateral angles in dorsal view ( Fig. 10A View FIGURE 10 ). Superior process of genital cup half-moon shaped and concave; apex reaching dorsal rim; partially visible in dorsal view ( Fig. 10A–C View FIGURE 10 ). Paramere long, dorsally directed; anterior lobe broadly expanded dorsally and rounded; posterior lobe short and triangular; inner face of the stalk with low evanescent carina curved to anterior lobe ( Fig. 10A–C View FIGURE 10 ). Proctiger with dorsolateral tufts of short setae separated by broad glabrous bridge; posterior face projected caudally and ventrally, surpassing ventral rim, resembling Greek letter Omega ( Fig. 10B–C View FIGURE 10 ). Ventral rim projected caudally, medial excavation shallow; expansions long, narrow, apex rounded, densely setose; surpassing level of posterolateral angles in ventral view ( Fig. 10D View FIGURE 10 ). Female unknown.
Comments. This species resembles Hypoxys boerneri and H. excavatus (see comments of H. excavatus ). However, this species is very different from all other species in the genus. This species has a dorsal rim very projected caudally, specially the corners; the paramere and posterior face of the proctiger are remarkable ( Fig. 10B,C View FIGURE 10 ); and ventral rim is clearly different from H. boerneri and H. excavatus ( Figs. 7D View FIGURE 7 , 10D View FIGURE 10 ).
Etymology. Name refers to the posterior face of proctiger resembling the Greek Omega letter (Suf. - oides: resembling, having the form of).
Distribution ( Fig. 21B View FIGURE 21 ). PERU: Cuzco.
USNM |
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |