Lachnus padi Hartig, 1841
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5369.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B0A58448-FE3B-4F2A-B876-E6EE2D95A89F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10166498 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038687EA-4260-FFC4-F0F6-B160FE7A0EAC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lachnus padi Hartig, 1841 |
status |
|
Lachnus padi Hartig, 1841 View in CoL nomen dubium
Lachnus padi Hartig, 1841: 368 View in CoL (nomen dubium —Eastop & Hille Ris Lambers, 1972: 237). HOLOTYPE: (361 [6.11]), Prunus padus View in CoL .
Lachnus pyri ( Hartig, 1841) View in CoL (misspelling— Rudow, 1875: 77, “ P. padus View in CoL ” identified as host).
Pterochloroides persicae ( Cholodkovsky, 1898) View in CoL (misapplied junior synonym—Börner, 1952: 47, “Syn.?”).
Specimen. A single pinned alate collected on May 15, 1836 from Prunus padus View in CoL in Tiergarten , Berlin, Germany .
Remarks. The specimen does not belong to the genus Lachnus . Its antennae are longer than its body, its secondary rhinaria are transverse, it lacks pigmented wings and it appears to have a waxy secretion on its legs and antennae. It is our opinion instead that the specimen belongs to the genus Euceraphis ( Walker, 1870) . Confirmation of its identity is needed, but it is clear that its synonymy with Pterchloroides persicae ( Cholodkovsky, 1898) as proposed by Börner (1952) is incorrect.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Lachnus padi Hartig, 1841
Brunet, Bryan M. T., Raupach, Michael J., Rehage, Heinz-Otto, Havill, Nathan P. & Foottit, Robert G. 2023 |
Lachnus pyri ( Hartig, 1841 )
Rudow, F. 1875: 77 |
Lachnus padi
Hartig, T. 1841: 368 |