Lethrus (Mesolethrus) dyonini A. Shapovalov & Bagaturov, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5351.4.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:786A8C61-AC0F-475C-B185-DD614C59AFDA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8400275 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3E6A87DA-FFC4-FF94-4993-FB1DFAC1FB9F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lethrus (Mesolethrus) dyonini A. Shapovalov & Bagaturov |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lethrus (Mesolethrus) dyonini A. Shapovalov & Bagaturov , new species
( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 5–8 , 19–21, 30–31 View FIGURES 9–31 , 37–38, 40–41 View FIGURES 32–43 )
? Lethrus (Microlethrus) microbuccis: Semenov & Medvedev 1936: 81 View in CoL (distribution: “environs of Tashkent up to foothills”).
Type locality. Uzbekistan, Tashkent Prov. GoogleMaps , S env. of Tashsay, 41°03’52.19”N 69°38’27.79”E, 838 m a.s.l.
Type material. Holotype, ♂ ( ZIN), Uzbekistan, Tashkent Prov. , 10 km SSW Krasnogorskyi , S env. of Tashsay , W footh. of Chatkal Mt. Range, 23.iii. 2014, 838 m a.s.l., 41°03’52.19”N 69°38’27.79”E S. Dyonin & I. Dyonina leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: allotype, ♀ ( ZIN) and 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ ( ASPC, MBPC), same locality and collector as for holotype, but 18.–31.iii.2018 GoogleMaps ; 5 ♂♂, 2 ♀ ( ASPC, MBPC), same data as for holotype; GoogleMaps 8 ♂♂, 6 ♀♀ ( ASPC), Uzbekistan, Tashkent Prov. , 14 km SSW Krasnogorskyi , S from Belovutsoy Riv., W footh. of Chatkal Mt. Range, 25.iii.2023, 794 m a.s.l., 41°01’43.38”N 69°38’27.71”E, S. Dyonin & I. Dyonina leg. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Gena 2.5–3.1 times as large as eye width, laterally narrowly and obliquely truncate, anterolateral angle usu-ally more or less rounded, posterolateral angle obtuse ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 5–8 , 37 View FIGURES 32–43 ). Punctation of pronotum relatively coarse, but not large, punctation of elytra double (sparse points and smaller dense points), elytra with only superficial thin trace of striae ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 5–8 ). Dorsal surface of body with faint blue, green or bronze tinge or without distinct tinge ( Figs. 7–8 View FIGURES 5–8 ). Parameres comparatively wide and straight, but apically not widened, weakly curved inward ( Figs. 19–21 View FIGURES 9–31 ). Sclerotized apex of endophallus resembling a subrectangular plate ( Figs. 30–31 View FIGURES 9–31 ), in dorsal view anteriorly with pair of relatively short lobes (distinctly shorter than basal part of sclerite) and emargination between them.
Description of holotype (♂). Body length with mandibles 17.2 mm, body length to clypeal margin 15 mm, maximal width of body (elytra behind base) 9.8 mm.
Body ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ) rounded, convex; dorsal surface black, head and pronotum with faint bluish tinge, elytra with faint greenish tinge, venter with blue tinge; head and pronotum slightly shiny, elytra matt.
Head ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ). Labrum bilobed, right lobe weakly more developed than left one; anterior margin with row of long dark-brown setae. Clypeus transverse, trapezoidal with rounded anterior angles. Frontal impressions very fine, frontal tubercles indistinct. Frontoclypeal suture weakly visible only laterally; keels separating gena from frons not sharp, but more or less distinct. Gena exceeding eyes, noticeably projected laterally, in dorsal aspect 2.5 times as large as eye width, laterally narrowly and obliquely truncate, anterolateral angle rounded, posterolateral angle distinct. Postorbital denticles very small. Pleurostomal process short, hardly exceeding ventrolateral mandible outline, gradually narrowed from base to apex. Punctation double, relatively dense, coarse, partly merged and rugose, punctures less deep on clypeus; gena with fine rugose sculpture, punctures scattered and superficial.
Mandibles ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ) ventral processes lacking, ventral margin of left mandible weakly arcuate before middle, ventral margin of right mandible near straight; in dorsal aspect mandibles symmetrical, subapically slightly emarginate, dorsal mandible surface with only short low keels: longitudinal keel on left mandible in the distal third and transversal keel on right mandible distal of the middle.
Pronotum ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ) transverse, distinctly broader than base of elytra, maximum width behind middle; margins entirely bordered, not crenulate. Anterior angles weakly projecting anteriorly, rounded; posterior angles widely rounded. Punctation relatively coarse, punctures sparser on disc, denser and coarser on lateral sides; micropunctures poorly visible on disc, more distinct on lateral sides.
Abdomen. Subapical visible ventrite with tuft of long erect setae distally.
Elytra ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ) almost semicircular, apices of elytra truncate, epipleuron strongly narrowed apicad, epipleural keel not reaching elytral apex. Surface with superficial thin trace of striae; punctation smaller than on pronotum, superficial, double: sparse points and smaller dense points.
Legs ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–8 ). Protibia with eight external teeth gradually diminishing proximad, and with row of tubercles on ventromedial edge.
Male genitalia ( Figs. 19–21, 30–31 View FIGURES 9–31 ). Aedeagus with oblong parameres: in ventral view parameres about half as long as phallobasis, parameres gradually narrowed, comparatively wide, straight along the interior margin, apices curved downwards and relatively weakly curved inward, in lateral view apically roundish. Sclerotized apex of endophallus resembles a subrectangular plate, in dorsal view anteriorly with a pair of relatively short lobes (distinctly shorter than basal part of sclerite) and emargination between them.
Variability of males. Body length with mandibles 15.1–17.4 mm, body length to clypeal margin 13.1–15.4 mm, maximal width of body (elytra behind base) 8.9–10 mm. Dorsal surface of the body as in holotype, or with faint bronze tinge or nearly black (in older and abraded specimens). Gena ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 32–43 ) in dorsal aspect 2.5–3.15 times as large as eye width. Sometimes left mandible on ventral margin with small obtuse angulate protrusion near the middle ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 32–43 ). Apices of elytra as in holotype ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 32–43 ) or sometimes slightly prominent.
Females ( Figs. 8 View FIGURES 5–8 , 41 View FIGURES 32–43 ). Body length with mandibles in allotype 15.8 mm, body length to clypeal margin 14.1 mm, maximal width of body (elytra behind the base) 9.3 mm. Dorsal surface of the body in allotype with bronze tinge ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 5–8 ). Variability in females: body length with mandibles 15.2–16.6 mm, body length to clypeal margin 13.4–14.6 mm, maximal width of body (elytra behind base) 8.9–9.5 mm. Apices of elytra angularly ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 32–43 ) or roundish prominent. Tuft on subapical ventrite with relatively numerous setae ( Fig. 41 View FIGURES 32–43 ).
Distribution. The new species is known from two close localities about 30 km south-east of Tashkent near Tashsay and southwards of Belovutsoy River, in western foothills of Chatkal Mountain Range (see map, Fig. 44 View FIGURE 44 ). Lethrus dyonini A. Shapovalov & Bagaturov , new species is distributed distantly from all other species of the subgenus Mesolethrus , and apparently vicariant with L. microbuccis in the north.
Etymology. The species is named in honour of Sergei Vladimirovich Dyonin (Tashkent, Uzbekistan), photographer, collector of insects and naturalist who has dedicated his life to the study of fauna and flora in Uzbekistan.
Ecology. Lethrus dyonini A. Shapovalov & Bagaturov , new species is found in foothills at an altitude of about 800 m a.s.l. in savannoid steppe ( Fig. 48 View FIGURE 48 ). Activity of imago is recorded in the second half of March. According to labels of studied material, the species occurs sympatrically with L. (Paralethrus) bituberculatus bituberculatus Ballion, 1871 .
Notes. The record of L. microbuccis for Tashkent ( Semenov & Medvedev 1936) was not considered by Nikolajev (1987; 2003), but this data can be connected with Lethrus dyonini A. Shapovalov & Bagaturov , new species.
ASPC |
Arnd Schroeder |
MBPC |
MBPC |
ZIN |
Russian Academy of Sciences, Zoological Institute, Zoological Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Mesolethrus |
Lethrus (Mesolethrus) dyonini A. Shapovalov & Bagaturov
Shapovalov, Andrey M. & Bagaturov, Mikhail F. 2023 |
Lethrus (Microlethrus) microbuccis:
Semenov, A. P. & Medvedev, S. I. 1936: 81 |