Lutosa brasiliensis ( Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1888 )

Cadena-Castañeda, Oscar J., García, Alexander García, Nos, Maria Del Pilar Castella-, Sarmiento, Juan Pablo Prias & Tavares, Gustavo Costa, 2022, Studies on chevron crickets: Contribution to the knowledge of Lutosinae / ini taxa (Orthoptera: Anostostomatidae), Zootaxa 5178 (4), pp. 347-379 : 367

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5178.4.3

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:24BCAB12-3C2C-4BD0-BD23-5027C9AC9A1F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7037056

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B487AE-2B35-FFC9-F7C3-FE5AFD94FBFB

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Lutosa brasiliensis ( Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1888 )
status

 

Lutosa brasiliensis ( Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1888) View in CoL

http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera .speciesfile.org:TaxonName:20080

Comments. This species was originally described as Pherterus brasiliensis Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1888 . Its description was based on a male and a female from Theresopolis, Santa Catharina, Brazil. This locality was a colony of German immigrants located at the banks of Cubatão River (and not the city of Teresópolis, Rio de Janeiro), near the capital of the state, Florianópolis. Currently, this locality is a district of the municipality of Águas Mornas ( Map 1 View MAP 1 ). Unfortunately, the two specimens used for the original description are lost (H. Braun comm. pers.), three specimens deposited in Vienna, identified as L. brasiliensis (two females and one male) do not belong to the specimens originally studied by Brunner von Wattenwyl (1888), they were actually later determined by Karny (1930).

The brief original description indicates that the fore tibia has two spines on the outer dorsal margin and the hind tibia is curved. Specimens currently identified as L. brasiliensis in Vienna do not meet these characteristics, and for us is a misidentification. With this scenario, the type specimens are lost and providing a redescription and reliable identification is not possible at this time. Therefore, it is necessary to designate a neotype, preferably from the type locality and that fits the morphological characteristics originally described, it is not recommended to make specimens from other localities, even if the localities are close, since this is a specious genus (although many of its species are still not formally described).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Orthoptera

SubOrder

Ensifera

SuperFamily

Stenopelmatoidea

Family

Anostostomatidae

SubFamily

Anostostomatinae

Tribe

Lutosini

Genus

Lutosa

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF