Macrojoppa, KRIECHBAUMER, 1898
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2002.00006.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D53C87D6-F965-FF92-FC42-FD8CFA2E1C7A |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Macrojoppa |
status |
|
MACROJOPPA KRIECHBAUMER, 1898 View in CoL View at ENA
Macrojoppa Kriechbaumer, 1898: 21 View in CoL . Type-species: Trogus blandita Cresson. Designated by Ashmead (1900b).
Cryptopyge Kriechbaumer, 1898: 21 . Type-species: Joppa picta Guérin. Designated by Ashmead (1900b). Syn. n.
Ischnopus Kriechbaumer, 1898: 25 View in CoL . Type species: ( Ischnopus longiceps Kriechbaumer ) = Ischnopus rufus Brullé. Designated by Ashmead (1900b). Preoccupied by Ischnopus Amyot, 1846 View in CoL and Ischnopus Faust, 1894 View in CoL . Syn. n.
Cryptopyga Schulz, 1906: 130 . Emendation of Cryptopyge .
Araeoscelis Schulz, (1909) 1911: 38 . Replacement name for Ischnopus Kriechbaumer 1898 View in CoL . Syn. n.
Areoscelis of authors. Lapsus View in CoL .
Aglaojoppidea Viereck, 1913: 368 . Type-species: Trogus fascipennis Cresson. Original designation. Synonymized with Macrojoppa View in CoL by Hopper (1939).
Autapomorphies. Clypeal punctures sparse or absent (#10–1); supra-antennal area medially with two low vertical ridges (#13–1); juxtacoxal carina absent (#22–1); anterior transverse carina of propodeum swollen medially (#29–1); lateral longitudinal carinae absent (#31–1); first lateral area with punctures scattered or absent (#34–1); petiole of MS1 basally with dorsal bulge (#44–1); S2-5 divided (#55–5); apex of female metasoma with T7-8 barely projecting beyond apex of T6 (#56–1).
Species and distribution. With the addition of Araeoscelis and Cryptopyge , and the removal of latipennis Cresson , Macrojoppa has 46 described species distributed from the United States (southern Texas) to Argentina ( Yu & Horstmann, 1997). There are numerous undescribed species.
Morley (1915: 55) recorded Macrojoppa subbifasciata Szépligeti (as Ischnopus subfasciatus ) from ‘Araucania’ in southern Chile, a locale that cannot be located on gazetteers. This record is suspect for several reasons. Extensive collections from Chile (AEIC, CCCP, CNCI) have not yielded specimens of the rufa species-group (= Araeoscelis ). Other than the
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Macrojoppa
Sime, Karen R. & Wahl, David B. 2002 |
Aglaojoppidea
Viereck HL 1913: 368 |
Cryptopyga
Schulz WA 1906: 130 |
Macrojoppa
Kriechbaumer J 1898: 21 |
Cryptopyge
Kriechbaumer J 1898: 21 |
Ischnopus
Kriechbaumer J 1898: 25 |