Incertosulcus Móczár, 1970

Barbosa, Diego N. & Azevedo, Celso O., 2020, Synopsis of Incertosulcus Móczár, 1970 (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae), Journal of Natural History 54 (21 - 22), pp. 1363-1393 : 1365-1367

Incertosulcus Móczár, 1970

Type-species: Incertosulcus soikai Móczár, 1970 , 16: 187. Original designation (HNHM). Incertosulcus Móczár, 1970 , 16: 177, 185. Domonkos Argaman, 2003 , 24:67, 79–80. Type-species: Mesitius capensis Kieffer, 1911 . Original designation (MRAC). Junior synonymous ( Azevedo et al. 2018).

Diagnosis

Body densely foveolate; head longer than wide, elliptical in lateral view; antenna with long antennal pubescence, and flagellomeres caliciform; anterior ocellus anterior to the supraocular line; longitudinal pronotal sulcus present or distinct; metapectal-propodeal complex with the posterior spine; the lateral surface of metapectal-propodeal complex with subdorsal and vertical carinae; metasoma with lateral pilosity on terga I and II; hypopygium longer than wide, with anterior stalk narrow, and posterior branches short and lobose; male genitalia with dorsal arm of paramere filamentary, aedeagus with the apical sickle process.

Check list

(1) I. capensis ( Kieffer, 1911)

(2) I. consimilis ( Móczár, 1970)

(3) I. erdoesi ( Móczár, 1970)

(4) I. katonai ( Móczár, 1970)

(5) I. pinotage Barbosa & Azevedo sp. nov.

(6) I. pinotnoir Barbosa & Azevedo sp. nov.

(7) I. priesneri ( Móczár, 1978)

(8) I. saintjohni ( Móczár, 1977) comb. nov. from Sulcomesitius

(9) I. sauvignonblanc Barbosa & Azevedo sp. nov.

(10) I. schoutedeni ( Benoit, 1968)

(11) I. semillon Barbosa & Azevedo sp. nov.

(12) I. shiraz Barbosa & Azevedo sp. nov.

(13) I. soikai Móczár, 1970

(14) I. vanharteni ( Barbosa & Azevedo, 2011)

(15) I. vietnamensis ( Móczár, 1977)

Key to female species

1. Brachypterous.......................................................................................................... I. pinotage sp. nov.

- Macropterous ............................................................................................................................................... 2

2. Metapectal-propodeal complex with long posterior projection (at least a third of the metapectal-propodeal complex length) ............................................................................................. 3

- Metapectal-propodeal complex with short posterior projection (less than a third of the metapectal-propodeal complex length) ............................................................................................. 4

3. Eye large [more than half of head lateral area]; ocelli small [DAO 1.0 × POL]; anteromesoscutum and mesoscutellum without longitudinal sulcus ................................ I. soikai Móczár, 1970

- Eye small [half of head lateral area]; ocelli large [DAO 0.5 × POL]; anteromesoscutum and mesoscutellum with longitudinal sulcus .................... I. vanharteni ( Barbosa & Azevedo, 2011)

4. Longitudinal antero-mesoscutal sulcus present ................................................................................ 5

- Longitudinal antero-mesoscutal sulcus absent ................................................................................... 6

5. Head longer than wide; median clypeal lobe quadrate; ocelli very small; anteromesoscutum coriaceous, posterior carina of metapectal-propodeal complex incomplete medially ..... .......................................................................................................................................................... I. shiraz sp. nov.

- Head as long as wide; median clypeal lobe rounded; ocelli small; anteromesoscutum foveolate, posterior carina of metapectal-propodeal complex complete ......................................... .................................................................................................................................... I. consimilis ( Móczár, 1970)

6. Flagellomere I twice as long as pedicel .............................................................. I. semillon sp. nov.

- Flagellomere I as long as, or slightly longer than pedicel .............................................................. 7

7. Head as long as wide; mesoscutellum with longitudinal sulcus; metapostnotum without longitudinal ridge between metaposnotal median carina and metaposnotal-propodeal suture ...................................................................................................................................... I. vietnamensis ( Móczár, 1977)

- Head longer than wide; mesoscutellum without longitudinal sulcus; metapostnotum with longitudinal ridge between metaposnotal median carina and metaposnotal-propodeal suture .......................................................................................................................... I. capensis ( Kieffer, 1911)

Key to male species

1. Metapectal-propodeal complex with long posterior projection (at least a third of the metapectal-propodeal complex length) .................................................................................................... 2

- Metapectal-propodeal complex with short posterior projection (less than a third of the metapectal-propodeal complex length) .................................................................................................... 6 2. Longitudinal antero-mesoscutal sulcus complete ............................................................................ 3

- Longitudinal antero-mesoscutal sulcus incomplete .......................................................................... 4

3. Head as long as wide; mesoscutellum without longitudinal sulcus; paramere dorsal arm filamentary, aedeagus with long sickle process .................................................. I. pinotnoir sp.nov.

- Head longer than wide; mesoscutellum with longitudinal sulcus; paramere dorsal arm swollen, aedeagus with short sickle process ............ I. vanharteni ( Barbosa & Azevedo, 2011)

4. Metapectal-propodeal complex more than 0.5 × as long as wide; metapostnotum without longitudinal ridge between metaposnotal median carina and metaposnotal-propodeal suture; posterior projection of metapectal-propodeal complex very long ...................................... ............................................................................................................................................ I. soikai ( Móczár, 1970)

- Metapectal-propodeal complex 0.5 × as long as widewide; metapostnotum with longitudinal ridge between metaposnotal median carina and metaposnotal-propodeal suture; posterior projection of metapectal-propodeal complex long (at least one third of the metapectal-propodeal complex length) .................................................................................................... 5

5. Malar space longer than VOL; pedicel fusiform; anteromesoscutum foveolate ....................... ......................................................................................................................................... I. erdoesi ( Móczár, 1970)

- Malar space as long as VOL; pedicel caliciform; anteromesoscutum coriaceous ....................... ................................................................................................................................. I. schoutedeni ( Benoit, 1968)

6. Longitudinal antero-mesoscutal sulcus absent ................................................................................. 7

- Longitudinal antero-mesoscutal sulcus present .................................................................................. 8

7. Malar space longer than VOL; pedicel rectangular; ocelli large [DAO more than 1.0 × POL]; posterior projection of metapectal-propodeal complex thick; hypopygium with spiculum short and acute .................................................................................................... I. priesneri ( Móczár, 1978)

- Malar space as long as VOL; pedicel caliciform; ocelli small, [DAO 1.0 × POL]; posterior projection of metapectal-propodeal complex thin; hypopygium with speculum long and wide .................................................................................................................. I. vietnamensis ( Móczár, 1977)

8. Malar space shorter than VOL ................................................................................................................... 9

- Malar space as long as VOL ........................................................................................................................ 10

9. Anteromesoscutum foveolate, longitudinal anteromesoscutal sulcus with inner median carina anteriorlly; posterior projection of metapectal-propodeal complex short ......................... ...................................................................................................................................... I. sauvignonblanc sp. nov.

- Anteromesoscutum coriaceous, longitudinal anteromesoscutal sulcus without inner median carina anteriorlly; posterior projection of metapectal-propodeal complex hardly distinct ..................................................................................................................................... I. kantonai ( Móczár, 1970)

10. Median clypeal lobe quadrate; hypopygium speculum short and acute; paramere dorsal arm filamentary, aedeagus with sickle process very short and lateral margin convex .............. ........................................................................................................... I. saintjohni ( Móczár, 1977) comb. nov. - Median clypeal lobe rounded; hypopygium speculum long and wide; paramere dorsal arm filamentary swollen at apex, aedeagus with sickle process long and lateral margin straight .................................................................................................................................... I. consimilis ( Móczár, 1970)