Microhygrodromicus politus, Shavrin, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5531.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:27F9603C-D2AB-4133-AFB8-5A674ACCD110 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14023147 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/02424054-5C44-FFDF-FF3C-FF4F8C8FC8B0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Microhygrodromicus politus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Microhygrodromicus politus sp. n.
( Figs 126 View FIGURES 125–126 , 136–141 View FIGURES 136–140 View FIGURE 141 )
Type material examined. Holotype ♂ ( Fig. 126 View FIGURES 125–126 ; dissected): ‘ CHINA: YUNNAN PROv. | Gongshan Co., Biluo Mts. | Pass.; mixed forest and alpine | meadows; 5.–8.vii.2019 | 28°04.7’N, 98°45.6’E, 3890m | Hájek, Hrůzová, Král, Růžička & Sommer lgt.’ <printed>, ‘ HOLOTYPE | Microhygrodromicus | politus sp. n. | Shavrin A.V. des. 2024’ <red, printed> ( NMPC).
Description. Measurements: HW: 0.60; HL: 0.51; OL: 0.20; LT: 0.10; AL: 0.00; PL: 0.68; PWmax: 0.72; PWmin: 0.52; ESL: 1.11; EW: 1.17; MTbL: 0.87; MTrL (holotype): 0.31 (MTrL 1–4: 0.16; MTrL 5: 0.15); AW: 1.19; AedL: 0.85; BL: 3.70.
Habitus as in Fig. 126 View FIGURES 125–126 . Body shiny; forebody dark-brown, with black abdomen; antennae, maxillary palpomeres 3–4, femori and tarsi brown; mouthparts and tibiae yellow-brown. Forebody without microsculpture except of apical portion of clypeus with sparse transverse reticulation, neck with fine transverse meshes and abdomen with indistinct transverse microsculpture. Pubescence fine and sparse, suberect, denser and longer on elytra and abdomen.
Head 1.1 times as broad as long, with distinctly elevated middle portion between anterior margins of eyes and infraorbital portion; anterio-median depression wide and deep; interocellar depression wide and moderately deep, subtriangular, from widest middle part at level of anterior third of eyes narrowed posteriad toward neck; anteocellar foveae long and deep, convergent latero-anteriad toward level of anterior third of eyes. Temples convex, twice shorter than longitudinal length of eyes. Distance between ocelli 1.8 times as long as distance between ocellus and eyes. Punctation irregular, sparser and finer in middle and denser between ocelli; neck with fine and sparse punctation. Last maxillary palpomere about as long as penultimate segment. Antennomere 3 slightly longer than 2, 4 slightly shorter than 3, 5–7 indistinctly broader and distinctly longer than 3, 8–9 slightly longer and broader than 7, 10 slightly shorter than 9, apical antennomere 1.6 times as long as 10.
Pronotum moderately wide in apical portion, slightly broader than long and distinctly broader than head, from widest anterior portion strongly narrowed posteriad toward obtuse posterior angles; lateral margins narrowly bordered, without crenulation; mediobasal portion in front of basal margin with moderately deep oval depression; laterobasal portions slightly and widely depressed. Punctation dense and deep, significantly larger than that in middle portion of head, sparser in medioapical portion, with narrow impunctated area in front of mediobasal part. Scutellum with fine and sparse punctation.
Elytra slightly depressed in middle, 1.6 times as long as pronotum. Punctation dense, slightly larger and deeper than that on pronotum, denser and finer around scutellum, and finer and sparser along suture.
Metatarsus distinctly more than twice shorter than metatibiae; apical metatarsomere slightly shorter than preceding four metatarsomeres.
Abdomen broader than elytra. Punctation sparse and fine, sparser in middle portions of abdominal tergites V–VIII.
Male. Posterior margin of abdominal tergite VIII straight ( Fig. 139 View FIGURES 136–140 ). Posterior margin of abdominal sternite VIII widely concave ( Fig. 140 View FIGURES 136–140 ). Genital segment as in Fig. 138 View FIGURES 136–140 . Aedeagus with wide basal portion, narrowed toward median lobe; median lobe gradually narrowed in apical third, with moderately wide apical portion, from middle narrowed toward subacute apex; parameres narrow, disinctly shorter than median lobe, with two long and two short apical setae; internal sac with several elongate sclerotized structures in about middle and preapical portion, with very long flagellum, spirally folded in basal portion ( Fig. 136 View FIGURES 136–140 ). Lateral aspect of the aedeagus as in Fig. 137 View FIGURES 136–140 .
Female unknown.
Comparative notes. Microhygrodromicus politus sp. n. can be distingushed from M. exiguus sp. n. by the larger body, darker abdomen, distinctly finer punctation of the head, longer temples not protruded posteriad, relatively broader apical part of the pronotum without lateral crenulation and with distinctly depressed mediobasal part, shorter elytra, shape of the elongate apical part of the median lobe narrowed toward subacute apex, and other details of the morphology of the aedeagus.
Distribution. The species is known only from the type locality in Biluo Mts., Yunnan, China ( Fig. 141 View FIGURE 141 ).
Bionomics. The holotype was collected between mixed forest and alpine meadow at an elevation of 3890 m a.s.l.
Etymology. The specific epithet is the Latin adjective politus , - a, - um (shiny). It alludes to the shiny forebody.
NMPC |
National Museum Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.