Drosophila serrata
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.174253 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:51B35F06-2927-49E4-9C72-DDC192730E24 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6262705 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D11687A2-0813-FFEA-FECE-B6B8FCB1B7B5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Drosophila serrata |
status |
|
Drosophila serrata View in CoL complex
Drosophila serrata complex—first reference Bock & Wheeler, Univ. Texas Publ. 7213, p. 49 Bock & Wheeler (1972) note that “the most extensively studied complex in the montium subgroup from the point of view of speciation and incipient speciation is that consisting of the three species D. serrata , D. birchii and D. dominicana ”. We can find no earlier mention of the “ serrata complex” in the literature, although Ayala refers to the “ serrata group” in the title of his 1965 papers (1965a, b), nor is there a formal description of the morphological characteristics of such a complex. It should be noted that the term “species complex” is not a formal taxonomic category.
After D. serrata View in CoL was described by Malloch (1927) from Eidsvold, Queensland (not “Esdivold” as is written on the label of the type specimen, and not “Eidsvolt” sensu Bock & Wheeler 1972), Dobzhansky & Mather (1961) detected a very similar form from Papua New Guinea and northern Australia and designated it as a D. serrata View in CoL subspecies: D. serrata birchii View in CoL . Ayala (1965a), tested sexual isolation between these two forms and a third (very closely resembling D. birchii View in CoL ), known only from Madang on the north coast of Papua New Guinea. His findings resulted in the reclassification of D. serrata birchii View in CoL as D. birchii View in CoL , and nomination of the Madang fly as D. dominicana ( Ayala 1965b) View in CoL . Following on from the work of Ayala (1965a), Baimai (1970a) studied incipient speciation within D. birchii View in CoL , and confirmed Ayala’s earlier conclusion that the populations of this species from Rabaul (New Britain), from mainland Papua New Guinea, and from northern Australia comprise a series of populations partially reproductively isolated from one another. Baimai (1970b) also found that several of the at least 40 polytene chromosome inversions in D. birchii View in CoL are unique to specific geographic areas. Investigations of ND5 microsatellite variation in Australian populations of D. birchii View in CoL have revealed no significant geographic structure and low nucleotide diversity ( Kelemen & Moritz 1999).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Sophophora |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Sophophora |