Neolebouria diacopae (Nagaty & Abdel Aal, 1962) Gibson, 1976
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4254.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0BDF72E4-5330-4EE7-8560-DF44E71C1F41 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6048972 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/436E87B5-BE7E-5558-FF67-FDC0FE9D4F5F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neolebouria diacopae (Nagaty & Abdel Aal, 1962) Gibson, 1976 |
status |
|
Neolebouria diacopae (Nagaty & Abdel Aal, 1962) Gibson, 1976 View in CoL
Synonyms: Hamacreadium diacopae Nagaty & Abdel Aal, 1962 ; Plagioporus diacopae (Nagaty & Abdel Aal, 1962) Yamaguti, 1971 .
Records. From Lutjanus fulviflamma [as Diacope fulviflamma Cuvier & Valenciennes ] in the Red Sea by Nagaty & Abdel Aal (1962c) as H. diacopae . From an unidentified Lethrinus species off Fiji by Manter (1963) as H. diacopae .
Remarks. This species was described based on a single specimen. Yamaguti (1971) transferred it to Plagioporus but Gibson (1976) added it to his original concept of Neolebouria , a combination recognised by subsequent authors (Aken'Ova & Cribb 2001; Dronen et al. 2014). Although the type-host is a lutjanid, the genital pore is distinctly extra-caecal. The excretory vesicle was not described. Manter (1963) did not provide an illustration or description for his specimens, which, due to the large geographical separation, may well represent a different species, perhaps Neolebouria lineata Aken’Ova & Cribb, 2001, which Bray & Justine (2009) reported from a nemipterid off New Caledonia. It is most reasonable to consider this species to belong in Neolebouria for the present.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Plagioporinae |
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Plagioporinae |
Genus |