Entoloma
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.391.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038187A8-0F0B-3222-BE82-FB10B70DF9F0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Entoloma |
status |
|
Entoloma View in CoL View at ENA subgenus Nolanea section Staurospora (Largent & Thiers) Noordel.
Comments:—A few species classified in section Staurospora were included in this study. Entoloma kipukae ( Horak & Desjardin 1993) , E. nothofagi (Horak 2008) , E. praestans ( Horak 1976) and E. conferendum ( Noordeloos 1992) , all have ‘Prismatic’ basidiospores ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 .m-o) and are placed in the /Nolanea-Claudopus clade ( Figs. 2, 3). It appears that species with nolaneoid (also described as mycenoid) habit and ‘Prismatic’ basidiospores are clearly different from species with ‘Cuboid’ basidiospores with similar macromorphological features. Our results are contrary to the hypotheses proposed by Noordeloos & Gates (2012) which suggested that species producing cuboid and prismatic basidiospores were closely related.These results also suggest the section Staurospora belongs to Nolanea and comprises species which produces ‘Prismatic’ basidiospores (not ‘Cuboid’), as originally proposed by Romagnesi (1974).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.