Oedignatha dian Lu & Li, 2023
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1144.97073 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8DA7D386-3AC7-4FA0-8D6E-22B3F660AF23 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A9991F52-8CA6-4857-98E0-F2E94DBD0A7C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:A9991F52-8CA6-4857-98E0-F2E94DBD0A7C |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Oedignatha dian Lu & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Oedignatha dian Lu & Li sp. nov.
Figs 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4 , 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6
Type material.
Holotype: 1 ♂ (IZCAS-Ar 43819), China, Yunnan, Xishuangbanna, Mengla County, Menglun Town, XTBG, Paramichelia baillonii plantation (about 20 years old), 21°54.772'N, 101°16.043'E, 608 m, collected by pitfall traps in leaf litter, 1-15 July 2007, G. Zheng leg. Paratypes: 1 ♂ (IZCAS-Ar 43820), same data as holotype, but 21°53.823'N, 101°17.072'E, 613 m, 16-31 May 2007; 1 ♀ (IZCAS-Ar 43821), same data as holotype, but secondary tropical seasonal rain forest, 21°55.428'N, 101°16.441'E, 598 m, 1-9 October 2006; 1 ♀ (IZCAS-Ar 43822), same data as holotype, but rubber-tea plantation (about 20 years old.), 21°55.551'N, 101°16.923'E, 561 m, 16-31 July 2007.
Etymology.
The specific name refers to the type locality (Dian is a short name for Yunnan) and is a noun in apposition.
Diagnosis.
The new species resembles O. barbata Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001 (cf. Figs 3 View Figure 3 - 6 View Figure 6 and Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: 271, figs 362-366): the males have a similar retrolateral tibial apophysis (Figs 5B, C View Figure 5 , 6B, C View Figure 6 ), and the females have similar bursae and spermathecae (Figs 3F View Figure 3 , 4B View Figure 4 ). Males can be distinguished by the tegular apophysis entirely sclerotized distally and with small membranous outgrowth basally (arrow 3 in Figs 5C View Figure 5 , 6C View Figure 6 ; vs tegular apophysis elliptical in ventral view, without these features), and by the tegulum with large membranous area in middle (Figs 5B View Figure 5 , 6B View Figure 6 ; vs tegulum without membranous area); females by the epigyne with two round spots (Figs 3E View Figure 3 , 4A View Figure 4 ; vs epigyne with two long elliptical strips).
Description.
Male (holotype, IZCAS-Ar 43819; Fig. 3A, B View Figure 3 ). Total body length 4.34: carapace 2.39 long, 1.67 wide; opisthosoma 1.95 long, 1.34 wide. Carapace reddish brown, sclerotized, with faint radial grooves and covered with pits, oval but strongly constricted at first coxae, lateral margins slightly sinuous; fovea as longitudinal slit-like. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.12, ALE 0.11, PME 0.10, PLE 0.09; AME-AME 0.10, AME-ALE 0.08, PME-PME 0.23, PME-PLE 0.21, ALE-PLE 0.09; MOA 0.33 long, anterior width 0.34, posterior width 0.41. Clypeus with conical hump. Chelicerae reddish brown strongly protruding (length: 0.97) in anterior part and knee-shaped, and with basal protuberance, covered with long setae, bearing unique thin macrosetae medially crossing each other, with three promarginal teeth and five retromarginal teeth. Endites and labium reddish brown; endite constricted in middle, median margin grooved, subapically with large, semicircular membranous area, apical margin with long, curved setae. Labium 1.33 times longer than wide, with subbasal constriction. Sternum reddish brown. Legs yellowish. Leg spination as shown in Table 2 View Table 2 . Leg measurements: I 9.31 (2.32, 0.62, 2.43, 2.39, 1.55); II 7.10 (1.93, 0.61, 1.71, 1.77, 1.08); III 5.86 (1.63, 0.44, 1.23, 1.59, 0.97); IV 8.19 (2.23, 0.55, 1.87, 2.35, 1.19). Opisthosoma reddish brown with faint reticulate pattern, oval, with large scutum covering entire dorsum surface; venter anteriorly reddish brown, posteriorly grey. Spinnerets grey.
Palp (Figs 5A-C View Figure 5 , 6A-C View Figure 6 ). Tibia length/width: 0.54/0.25, distally with dorsal hump (arrow 1 in Figs 5C View Figure 5 , 6C View Figure 6 ), prolateral triangular process (arrow 2 in Figs 5A View Figure 5 , 6A View Figure 6 ), and with retrolateral tibial apophysis (length/width: 0.14/0.06) sclerotized, with dorsal branch the larger, triangular, and ventral branch thin, laminate. Cymbium long and narrow. Bulbus length/width: 0.42/0.37, 1/2 length of cymbium. Tegulum with distinct, sinuous sperm duct and large membranous area in middle. Tegular apophysis strongly sclerotized distally and with small membranous outgrowth basally (arrow 3 in Figs 5C View Figure 5 , 6C View Figure 6 ). Embolus filiform, curved and tapered apically, originating from 8:00-9:30 o’clock on tegulum.
Female (paratype, IZCAS-Ar 43821; Fig. 3C, D View Figure 3 ). Total body length 5.46: carapace 2.56 long, 1.76 wide; opisthosoma 2.90 long, 1.82 wide. Color and somatic morphology as in male, except as noted. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.13, ALE 0.12, PME 0.10, PLE 0.10; AME-AME 0.12, AME-ALE 0.09, PME-PME 0.21, PME-PLE 0.20, ALE-PLE 0.08; MOA 0.34 long, anterior width 0.37, posterior width 0.41. Leg measurements: I 9.76 (2.52, 0.66, 2.79, 2.57, 1.22); II 7.44 (2.24, 0.56, 1.94, 1.75, 0.95); III 6.35 (1.66, 0.58, 1.32, 1.75, 1.04); IV 9.12 (2.46, 0.64, 2.13, 2.56, 1.33). Opisthosoma brown, with scutum covering 4/5 of dorsum surface; venter of opisthosoma with epigastric scutum and with two brown stripes converging posteriorly; laterally with pale stripes.
Epigyne (Figs 3E, F View Figure 3 , 4A, B View Figure 4 ). Epigynal plate rectangular, length/width: 0.82/1.10, with two dark, round spots visible by transparency. Vulva with large spherical spermathecae, separated by less than their diameter from each other, roundish bursae and pair of fertilization ducts pointing antero-laterally. Copulatory openings wide, visible in ventral view. Copulatory ducts nearly elliptical in dorsal view, connecting bursae to spermathecae.
Variations.
Paratype male: total body length 5.21. Second paratype female: total body length 6.18.
Distribution.
China (Yunnan, type locality; Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ).
Note.
The new species maybe identical to Oedignatha cf. jocquei of Ramírez (2014: 233, fig. 161f-h, based on material from Ha Tinh, Vietnam). Further studies are necessary for solid conclusion.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |