Orcevia kuloni Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5384.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0211978A-E124-4D9F-9A92-B565AA7B7891 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10376314 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038CA47F-726C-2078-C6B5-7FD39181FBF6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Orcevia kuloni Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 |
status |
|
Orcevia kuloni Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 View in CoL (库Rĸ尔¤)
Figs 132–141 View FIGURES 132–137 View FIGURES 138–141
Orcevia kuloni Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012: 52 View in CoL , figs 108–113; Prószyński, 2017: 75, fig. 38C; Prószyński, 2019: 122, figs 1K, P, T.
Laufeia kuloni ( Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012) View in CoL : Zhang & Maddison, 2015: 30.
Type material. Holotype: ♂ ( CDML), Indonesia: Java, Udjung Kulon Reserve , leaf litter, 14–25 Nov. 1986, leg. C.L. Deeleman & P.R. Deeleman. Allotype: 1♀, same data as holotype (C.L. Deeleman re-examined and shared photos of type specimens) .
Other material examined. 1♂ 1♀ ( MNHN; 13193), Java (labeled as “ L. perakensis ”) .
Diagnosis. It resembles O. deelemanae sp. nov., O. keyserlingi , O. pakse sp. nov., O. meinei sp. nov. and O. timburtoni sp. nov. in the shape of palpal bulb and presence of the lobe on tip of RTA, but can be distinguished from latters by the front edge of the lobe on tip of RTA that is obviously concaved ( Figs 135 View FIGURES 132–137 , 139–140 View FIGURES 138–141 ). Females can be distinguished from O. eucola , O. meinei sp. nov. and O. timburtoni sp. nov. by the melanic areas of femur IV and tibia IV present only on distal half ( Fig. 133 View FIGURES 132–137 ; vs. femur and tibia IV whole dark in O. timburtoni sp. nov., femur IV whole dark in O. meinei sp. nov. and tibia IV whole dark in O. eucola ).
Description. See Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold (2012: 52).
Distribution. Indonesia (Java).
Remark. One male and one female collected from Java and deposited in MNHN (13193; labeled as “ L. perakensis ”) show the same genital features, body character and pattern of legs as the type specimens of O. kuloni . Even though Simon’s drawing of Orcevia perakensis was simple, it still showed this species has rather long RTA extending beyond the top margin of LPT ( Simon 1903: fig. 971), whereas the tip of RTA is lower than top margin of LPT in O. kuloni ; together with the long distance between the type localities of these two species (more than 1400 km), we consider O. kuloni is not conspecific to O. perakensis . Therefore, we herein identify that pair of specimens (MNHN 13193) as O. kuloni .
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Orcevia kuloni Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012
Yu, Kun, Maddison, Wayne P. & Zhang, Junxia 2023 |
Laufeia kuloni ( Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012 )
Zhang, J. & Maddison, W. P. 2015: 30 |
Orcevia kuloni Prószyński & Deeleman-Reinhold, 2012: 52
Proszynski, J. 2019: 122 |
Proszynski, J. 2017: 75 |
Proszynski, J. & Deeleman-Reinhold, C. L. 2012: 52 |