Cithaerias pireta (Stoll)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3873.5.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:05BD334C-493D-4688-92E8-602943ECF57D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6131663 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DC878D-3363-FFB5-FF47-9CDCFED3FCAF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cithaerias pireta (Stoll) |
status |
|
Cithaerias pireta (Stoll) View in CoL
( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2. C , 6 View FIGURE 6 a, 8a, 9)
Papilio menander Drury , preocc. Stoll.
Type material: Likely lost ( Lamas 1998).
Distribution. Central America, plus Colombia and Ecuador west of the Andes, pacific slope. See map ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) for examined specimens.
Diagnosis. This species is defined based on the following combination of characters (numbered in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2. C ): (1) male HW submarginal and marginal bands forming even arches and often amalgamated to produce a wide brown outline distally on the wing; (2) male HW postmedial band that outlines the ocellus usually complete across cells Rs through M2; (3) male HW postmedial band approximates an arch across cells M3 through Cu2 (more so than any other species); (4) male HW rose scaling diffuse, often reaching the edge of the discal cell; (5) female similar to male but with paler scaling and wider HW brown bands. Male genitalia ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 a): in lateral view, note the sharply bent uncus; in dorsal view, the angular lateral edges of uncus plus tegument; in ventral view, the inner projection of the valva. Phallus short. Subscaphium triangular-shaped and bearing small spines. The subscaphium is not evident given it is weakly sclerotized. Female genitalia ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 a): note short sterigma, which is less sclerotized than those of other species. Post-sterigmal area weakly sclerotized, lacking the discrete heavily sclerotized indentation present in other species.
Variation in wing pattern ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2. C ). In both males and females FW and HW medial brown bands may be welldeveloped, incomplete or absent (compare Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2. C a and g). HW postmedial and marginal bands can vary in width, being extremely thin in some specimens. Male and female HW rose scaling usually does not reach discal cell, but these scales may enter the discal cell in some specimens. Male HW white spot in cell M2 present or absent, but normally present in females. Some examined specimens showed wing wear (fewer scales), and the scales of a few old collection specimens appear to have faded.
Subspecies. Cithaerias pireta magdalenensis Constantino ; holotype in the Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia, http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/L/ih/n_ cithaerias 0031_i.htm (last accessed 22 June 2014).
Remarks. This species is distinct from all others in both wing and genitalia characters. We concur with D’Almeida (1951) that Cramer’s figure seems to correspond to C. pireta (compare Figs 1a View FIGURE 1. a and 2 View FIGURE 2. C ) and that C. menander should be considered a synonym of C. pireta . Consequently we are also confident that the illustrations of C. menander in Weymer (1910) and Brown (1942) correspond to C. pireta . Male genitalia from specimens collected close to the type locality of C. pireta magdalenensis match those in specimens from Central America and Ecuador (also noted by Constantino 1995). We note that the defining wing pattern characters of C. pireta magdalenensis are not unique to specimens of the region for which this taxon has been described (Caldas, Rio Guarinó, Colombia; Constantino 1995). According to the original description, these are: (1) the FW brown transversal lines are faded, and so is the HW transversal line (also in specimens from Nicaragua and Costa Rica, Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2. C a and c); (2) the HW show a marginal line, in addition to the submarginal, which is not present in C. pireta pireta males (note such line in specimens from Costa Rica and Panama, Fig. 2c View FIGURE 2. C and d); (3) the submarginal line [of the HW] is narrower and more faded (this characters varies within localities and is also present in the specimen in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2. C d); (4) the HW rose blush ranges from the wing margin to M2, not entering the cell (this is true for most specimens of C. pireta ); (5) the same as in the male, the female shows a well defined white spot between HW veins M2 and M3 (also present in specimens from Central America and other areas, Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2. C b and e). Despite this, we recognize that the type locality is isolated from the remainder of the range of C. pireta , which justifies the recognition of this taxon. Specimens from that region were not available to us for examination. The use of DNA sequence to compare specimens from various localities would be of interest.
Material examined: MALE: 1M Honduras, no date ( CMNH); 1M Honduras, Lancetilla, 7 November 1930 ( CMNH); 1M Nicaragua, Zelaya Dept. Nueva Guinea, 26 October 1976, dissection CMP 13-08 (UFL); 1M Nicaragua, Zelaya Dept. Nueva Guinea, 27 October 1976 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, Puntarenas, Finca Las Cruces, San Vito de Java, 29 September 1986 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, Turrialba, 25 August 1973 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, Puntarenas, San Vito, Las Alturas, 1600 m 15 September 1983 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, Limon, Ruta 32, 18.9 km W Compiles (sic), 12 September 1986 (UFL); 2M Costa Rica, Heredia, Sarapiqui, Chilamate, 30 March and 1 April 1989 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, Limon, Tortuguero, Agua Fria, 50 m, 17 August 1983 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, San Jose Carillo, Fila Rio Sucio, 700 m, 21 April 1983 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, Turrialba, 15 July 1973 (UFL); 1M Costa Rica, Cartago, Moravia de Chiripo, 1200 m, 11 February 1983 (UFL); 15M Costa Rica, Heredia, Sarapiqui, Tirimbina Biological Station, various dates in 2009, 2010 and 2011, three dissected LGA 12-01, 12-02 and 12-03 (PJD); 1M Costa Rica, no date ( CMNH); 1M Costa Rica, Limon, Guapiles, 9 August 1963 ( CMNH); 1M Costa Rica, Limon, no date ( CMNH); 3M Costa Rica, Sixola Riv. (sic), no date ( CMNH); 3M Costa Rica, Juan Viñas, 14 and 15 March 1908 ( CMNH); 1M Costa Rica, Esperanza, no date ( CMNH); 1M, Costa Rica, Turrialba, 26 July 1909 ( CMNH); 1M Costa Rica 6 January 1892 ( CMNH); 2M Panama, Canal Zone, Piña, 27 July 1970 and July 1970 (UFL); 1M Panama, Gatun, Canal Zone, August 1915 ( CMNH); 2M Panama, Madden Dam, 19 and 22 April 1966 (UFL); 1M Panama, Panama, Cerro Campana, 10 January 1973 (UFL); 1M Panama, Darien, Gorgas Bayano Sta., 27 December 1975, dissection CMP 13-09 (UFL); 1M Panama, Chriqui, no date ( CMNH); 1M Colombia 5 December 1889 ( CMNH); 1M Colombia, Bogotá, no date ( CMNH); 2M, Colombia, Carmen de Yacopi, April 1914 M. Clifton dissection slides 106, 107 ( CMNH); 1M Colombia, Valle Calima, 19 March 1988 (UFL); 1M Colombia, Bajo Calima Valle 300 m, 20 January 1988, dissection CMP 13-11 (UFL); 2M Colombia (UFL); 3M Ecuador, Huigra, March 1911 ( CMNH); 1M Ecuador, Dos Puentes, March 1980 ( CMNH); 2M Ecuador, Tinalandia 21–25 July 1984, one dissected LGA 12-07 (UFL); 1M Ecuador, Pichincha, 12 km E of Santo Domingo de Los Colorados, 750–850 m 13 May 1988 (UFL); 1M Ecuador, Pichincha, 12 km E of Santo Domingo de Los Colorados, 750–850 m 5 May 1988, dissection LGA 12-08 (UFL); 1M Ecuador, Pichincha, Loriquin 20 July 1968 dissection LGA 12-09 (UFL); 1M Ecuador, Pichincha, Rio Tachi 22 July 1968 (UFL); 1M Ecuador, El Oro, Los Monos February 1973 (UFL); 1M Ecuador, Napo, Limoncocha (likely mislabeled) 26 September 1974 dissection CMP 13-10 (UFL). FEMALE: 1F Nicaragua, Zelaya Dept. Nueva Guinea, 26 October 1976 (UFL); 2F Costa Rica, Turrialba, 28 July 1973 and 15 January 1981 (UFL); 1F Costa Rica, Limon, Cerro Guabas, 400 m, 20 January 1979 (UFL); 2F Costa Rica, Heredia, Sarapiqui, Chilamate, 30 March and 1 April 1989 (UFL); 1F Costa Rica, Alajuela, Rion Angel, La Virgen del Socorro, 9 April 1989 (UFL); 1F Costa Rica, San Jose, Parque Nacional Carillo, Fila Rio Sucio, 700 m, 20 February 1983 (UFL); 1F Costa Rica, Limon, Paraiso, 3 September 1987 (UFL); 2F Costa Rica, Puntarenas, Finca Las Cruces, San Vito de Java, 29 and 30 September 1986 (UFL); 3F Costa Rica, Heredia, Sarapiqui, Tirimbina Biological Station, 10 May and 2 September 2010 and 22 February 2011, 1 dissected CMP 13-38 (PJD); 1F Costa Rica, Sixola Riv. (sic), no date ( CMNH); 3F Costa Rica, Juan Viñas, 11 March 1908 ( CMNH); 2F Costa Rica, Limon, Guapiles, 9 August 1963 ( CMNH); 1F, Costa Rica, Guapiles, no date ( CMNH); 1F Costa Rica, Alajuela, Florencia, 13 July 1963 ( CMNH); 1F Costa Rica, Puntarenas, Golfito, 17 August 1963 ( CMNH); 2F Panama, Chiriqui, no date ( CMNH); 1F Panama, no date ( CMNH); 1F Panama, Madden Forest, 21 April 1966 (UFL); 2F Panama, Canal Zone, Piña, 2 July and July 1970 (UFL); 1F Panama, Cerro Campana, 2500 [m] 6 November 1964 (UFL); 3F Panama, Darien, Gorgas Bayano Sta., 25 December 1975, 1 dissected CMP 13- 28 (UFL); 1F Colombia (UFL); 1F Colombia, Environs of Bogota, 1913 (likely mislabeled) (UFL); 1F Peru, Loreto, Iquitos (likely mislabeled) (UFL); 1F Ecuador, Napo, Limoncocha (likely mislabeled) 1 July 1980 (UFL); 1F Ecuador, Pichincha, Rio Tachi 22–25 July 1968 (UFL); 1F Ecuador, El Oro, Los Monos February 1973 (UFL); 2F Ecuador, Pichincha, 12 km E of Santo Domingo de Los Colorados, 750–850 m 13 May 1988 (UFL); 2F Ecuador, Pichincha, Rio Tachi 21–25 July 1968 and 17 July 1968 (UFL); 1F Ecuador, Pichincha, Alluriquin 13 August 1972 (UFL).
CMNH |
The Cleveland Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |