Perarogula lamottei Hoffmann, 1963
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4344.3.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28FD74C1-3461-4789-9BD4-B835B7D1985C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6050276 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EF4C4E-6B65-FFDE-FF66-120FFD75F8B5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Perarogula lamottei Hoffmann, 1963 |
status |
|
Perarogula lamottei Hoffmann, 1963 View in CoL
( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 )
Perarogula lamottei Hoffmann, 1963: 313 View in CoL (original description).
Perarogula lamottei: Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal, 1999: 183 View in CoL (catalogue).
Type locality. Nimba , Mont Tô [ Guinea].
Material examined. Paratypes, 1 spec. ( MNHN): ‘76 Pb [hw] / IFAN, NIMBA ( Guinée) Lamotte et Roy VII– XII 51 [p, blue] / Perarogula lamottei m. [hw] A. Hoffmann det. [p] / PARATYPE [p, red] / Muséum Paris [p] Guinée M. Lamotte [hw, blue]’; 2 spec. with same data except ‘ Ph’ and ‘ Pg’; 1 spec. ( MNHN) with same data but two additional labels reading ‘ Mt To (1600 m) Camp 1 [p] / Omotrachelus sp. ign. [hw] Det. G. A. K. Marshall [p]’; 1 spec. ( MNHN): ‘ Mt. Nimba , Guinea VII-XII 1951, Lamotte et Roy [hw] / Perarogula lamottei m. [hw] A. Hoffmann det. [p] / PARATYPE [p, red] / Muséum Paris [p] Guinée M. Lamotte [hw, blue]’ ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ).
Remarks. This genus and species were described for 7 specimens of both sexes from Nimba in Guinea. Hoffmann regarded it as being similar to “ Coenopsis (Otiorrhynchinae) ”, i.e. the genus Caenopsis Bach, 1854 , now placed in Trachyphloeini , based on the state of the longitudinal furrows behind the eyes in lateral view, and to Trachyphloeini based on its unusual elytral striae and the structure of the metacoxae and ventrite 5. However, these three characters are not typical only for Trachyphloeini . According to the state of its antennal scrobes in lateral view, which are of the “brachyderine” type (narrow, invisible dorsally, the dorsal and ventral margins sharp, directed below the eyes and separated from them), the connate claws and the metatibiae lacking corbels, this genus clearly belongs to the tribe Sciaphilini Sharp, 1891 , as already surmised by Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal (1999: 183) wherein they state it is “Probably a Sciaphilini ”.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Perarogula lamottei Hoffmann, 1963
Borovec, Roman & Skuhrovec, Jiří 2017 |
Perarogula lamottei: Alonso-Zarazaga & Lyal, 1999 : 183
Alonso-Zarazaga 1999: 183 |
Perarogula lamottei
Hoffmann 1963: 313 |