Phaeodothis tricuspidis Syd. & P. Syd., Annls
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.428.3.5 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/038C043A-F96A-8304-FF3C-64C3FE36CA7B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Phaeodothis tricuspidis Syd. & P. Syd., Annls |
status |
|
Phaeodothis tricuspidis Syd. & P. Syd., Annls View in CoL mycol. 2(2): 166 (1904)
Index Fungorum Number: IF 185110; Facesoffungi number: FoF 00060, FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 3
Saprobic on dead wood or grasses. Sexual morph: Ascomata 220–300×120−180 μm (x = 255×137 μm, n=10), immersed to nearly superficial under clypeus, scattered to gregarious, subglobose to hemispherical, dark brown to black, papillate. Papilla black, with pore-like ostioles, ostiolar canal filled with periphyses. Peridium 15−25μm (x =23μm, n=20) wide, comprising several layers of hyaline to light brown, compressed cells of textura angularis , fusing and indistinguishable from the host tissues. Hamathecium of 2−4 μm wide (x = 2.6 μm, n=20), aseptate, cellular pseudoparaphyses often embedded in a gelatinous matrix. Asci 50 − 80 × 7−12 μm (x = 69 × 10 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, cylindrical, short pedicellate, apically rounded with a minute ocular chamber. Ascospores 14−17 × 4−5μm (x = 15.8 × 4.5 μm, n=30), unit to biseriate and partially overlapping, fusiform with rounded ends, olivaceous brown, 1-septate, constricted at the septa, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: unknown.
Material examined: — ARGENTINA, San José, Salta, on leaves of Tricuspis latifolia Griseb. ( Poaceae ), 12 February 1873, P.G. Lorentz (SF125876, holotype).
Notes:— Phaeodothis tricuspidis was introduced by Sydow and Sydow (1904), from living leaves of Tricuspis latifolia Griseb. ( Poaceae ) and they assumed it to be very close to those of Dothidella , but differ in having dark ascospores ( Malloch & Mallik 1998). Phaeodothis mori can be distinguished from the type species, P. tricuspidis in having smaller ascomata (100–150 × 80–130 μm) and yellowish brown, ascospores (10.5–12.5 × 3–4 μm) with mucilaginous sheath, whereas P. tricuspidis has larger ascomata (220–300×120−180 μm) and olivaceous brown, ascospores (14−17 × 4−5μm) lacking a mucilaginous sheath. As well as, Phaeodothis tricuspidis has been recorded from dead grass stems ( Poaceae ), which is a monocot; whereas P. mori was recorded from the decaying leaves of Morus australis ( Moraceae ), which is a dicot. However, molecular data are essentially needed to clarify phylogenetic placement of type species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.