Philomessor (Attumbrinus) lackneri, Vávra, 2015

Vávra, Jiří Ch., 2015, Review of the subgenus Attumbrinus (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Philomessor), with description of Philomessor lackneri sp. nov. from Morocco, Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 55 (1), pp. 85-103 : 88-93

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5372938

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FC0EF6ED-15E6-437A-94D3-25F3D8D98734

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5332545

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03A46A7D-FFED-0C7A-FC65-8B3CFCC1F998

treatment provided by

Marcus

scientific name

Philomessor (Attumbrinus) lackneri
status

sp. nov.

Philomessor (Attumbrinus) lackneri View in CoL sp. nov.

( Figs 1, 2, 6 View Figs 1–8. 1, 3 , 14–17, 20 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 , 26, 27 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 , 33, 34 View Figs 33–40. 33, 35, 37, 39 , 41–45 View Figs 41–48. 41 , 49 View Figs 49–54. 49, 51, 53 , 55, 57 View Figs 55–58. 55 , 59 View Fig )

Type locality. Morocco, High Atlas Mts., Oukaïmeden, 2357 m a.s.l., 31º13.822′N, 07º49.264′W.

Type material. HOLOTYPE: J ( NMPC), ‘ MOROCCO 20.V.2011 / OUKAÏMEDEN ENV. (2357m) / N 31º13,822 ′ W07º49,264 ′ / Peter Koniar & Martin Švarc lgt. [white label, printed] ’. ALLOTYPE: ♀ [MD] ( JVAC), ‘ MOROCCO 20.V.2011 / OUKAÏMEDEN ENV.(2237m) / N 31º14,236 ′ W07º49,055 ′ / Peter Koniar & Martin Švarc lgt. [white label, printed] ’. PARATYPES: 1 ♀ ( MNHN), ‘ MAROC 19 3. 6 8 [19.iii.1968] / I T O [Ito near Azrou] / H. COIFFAIT [white label, printed] ’; 2 JJ ( TLAC, JVAC), ‘ Maroc centr. / Moyen Atlas / Ifrane env. [Tizi-n-Tretten near Ifrane, 33°27′N, 5°02′W, 1900 m a.s.l.] 17- 21.6.1998 / T. Lackner lgt. [white label, printed] GoogleMaps ’; 1 ♀ ( NMPC), ‘ MOROCCO 21.V.2009 / OUKAÏMEDEN ENV. (2245m) / N 31º14,257 ′ W07º49,066 ′ / Peter Koniar & Martin Švarc lgt. [white label, printed] ’; 1 J ( JRUC), ‘ MOROCCO, Toubkal National / Park, Oukaimeden, on road / 2028, 1 870 m a.s.l., 14.V.2010 / 0613390E- 3457303N / Di Giulio, Maurizi, Bravi leg. [white label, printed] ’; 4 JJ 2 ♀♀ (1 J 1 ♀ in PKOC; 2 JJ, 1 ♀ [MD] in MSVC; 1 J in JVAC), same data as allotype .

Description. Male. Body length 3.0–3.4 mm (holotype 3.0 mm). Body slender ( Fig. 26 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 ). Winged. Head dark brown to black brown, pronotum dark brown. Elytra, legs and maxillary palpi light brown. Antennae brown, two basal antennomeres and the tip of the terminal one lighter. Pubescence light and of two kinds: entire body covered with short, dense and recumbent setae, somewhat longer on head and pronotum than on elytra; on elytra the short setae intermixed with long erect setae, which are, especially on disc, more than three times longer than the recumbent ones ( Fig. 34 View Figs 33–40. 33, 35, 37, 39 ).

Head transverse, 1.2 times wider than long. Surface shiny, finely punctate, punctures separated by more than their diameter. Interspaces with very fine microsculpture. Eyes developed, feebly prominent.

Antennae ( Fig. 14 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 ) long and slender, 2.4–2.5 (holotype 2.5) times longer than pronotum. Three terminal antennomeres dorsoventrally flattened.

Pronotum transverse, 2.4–2.5 (holotype 2.5) times wider than long and 1.6–1.7 (holotype 1.6) times wider than head. Disc with pair of shallow lateral impressions at its midlength, furter paired impressions sometimes situated closer to median axis and base (also in holotype). Punctation of pronotum granular, very fine and dense, punctures separated by less than one diameter, at places contiguous. Microsculpture of interspaces very fine, but distinct.

Scutellum distinct, triangular, in middle finely and densely granulate.

Elytra oblong, feebly convex, 1.6–1.7 (holotype 1.6) times longer than wide, 2.8–2.9 (holotype 2.9) times longer than pronotum, their maximum combined width equal to or slightly wider than the width of pronotum. Tips of elytra separately rounded, almost rectangular. Punctation of elytra ( Fig. 33 View Figs 33–40. 33, 35, 37, 39 ) granular and of two kinds. Fine granular punctures occurring all over surface of elytra, somewhat coarser and sparser than on pronotum and separated by more than one diameter, are intermixed with distinctly raised and larger granules bearing long erect setae. Microsculpture between punctures absent and elytra therefore appear more shiny than pronotum.

Three basal protarsomeres ( Fig. 41 View Figs 41–48. 41 ) dilated, becoming gradually narrower distad. Apical margins of tarsomeres simply emarginate. First tarsomere wider than apical margin of protibia and almost twice as wide as the second. Protibia ( Fig. 42 View Figs 41–48. 41 ) feebly outcurved. Mesotarsus long and narrow, as long as mesotibia. Mesotibia ( Fig. 44 View Figs 41–48. 41 ) feebly curved, its inner margin except for basal portion with fine, dense and erect setae. Metatarsus long and narrow, as long as metatibia. Metatibia ( Fig. 49 View Figs 49–54. 49, 51, 53 ) straight, its inner margin only in apical portion with fine, dense and erect setae.

Abdominal terga without impressions. Outer margin of sternum VIII broadly emarginate in middle ( Fig. 6 View Figs 1–8. 1, 3 ). Genital segment oval, anterior part wide, extremely elongated, trifid anterolaterally and strongly sclerotized ( Figs 9, 10 View Figs 9–12 ). Aedeagus in dorsal view narrowed in basal portion, widest in middle and in apical portion tapering into long acute point ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–8. 1, 3 ), in lateral view regularly arcuate with feebly S-shaped apical portion ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–8. 1, 3 ), parameres narrow, equally broad all along their length with two long setae at apex, distinctly not reaching tip of aedeagus ( Fig.1 View Figs 1–8. 1, 3 ).

Female. Body length 2.9–3.3 mm (allotype 3.0 mm). Body slender ( Fig. 27 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 ). Colouration as in males (allotype and 2 paratypes), or head and pronotum black brown and elytra brown (1 paratype).Antennae ( Fig. 15 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 ) shorter than in male, 2.4–2.5 (allotype 2.5) times longer than pronotum. Pronotum transverse, 1.8–1.9 (allotype 1.9) times wider than long. Elytra 1.6–1.7 (allotype 1.6) times longer than their combined width, 3.0–3.1 (allotype 3.1) times longer than pronotum and their maximum combined width equal to or slightly wider than pronotum.

Three basal protarsomeres ( Fig. 43 View Figs 41–48. 41 ) dilated, but narrower than in males, gradually narrowed distad. First tarsomere slightly narrower than apical margin of protibia and only a little wider than the second. Apical margins of the first and second protarsomere ( Fig. 45 View Figs 41–48. 41 ) with distinct median tooth.

Sternum VIII ( Fig. 20 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 ) as wide as long, on inner margin with long and tapering spiculum ventrale, outer margin rounded with long setae. Terga IX and X ( Fig. 17 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 ) feebly sclerotized, only apex of tergum X and lateral margins of tergum IX more sclerotized. Tergum X long and narrow, dilated in apical portion, apex rounded with long setae. Stylus ( Fig. 16 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 ) long and narrow, with long setae.

Geographic variability. Populations from Tizi-n-Tretten near Ifrane and Oukaïmeden somewhat differ in the size and the shape of the pronotum. Specimens from Tizi-n-Tretten are in average larger, their pronota are more convex, less narrowed anteriorly and posterior margin more emarginate at posterior angles than in the specimens from Oukaïmeden. With respect to coincident habitual proportions and further morphological characters given above I consider both populations conspecific and the mentioned differences to be local variation.

Differential diagnosis. Philomessor lackneri sp. nov. is placed in the subgenus Attumbrinus Jeannel, 1936 because of the long and erect pubescence of elytra ( Fig. 34 View Figs 33–40. 33, 35, 37, 39 ) and fine, dense and long pubescence of mesotibiae ( Fig. 44 View Figs 41–48. 41 ). It differs from Philomessor (Attumbrinus) henroti Růžička, 1996 first of all in the shape of pronotum, which is not deeply emarginate at the base besides posterior angles ( Figs 26, 27 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 vs. 32, 40), different pubescence and double punctation of elytra ( Figs 33, 34 View Figs 33–40. 33, 35, 37, 39 vs. 39) and also in narrow body and different shape of aedeagus. From P. (A.) cloueti ( Portevin, 1907) it differs especially in the shape of the posterior margin of pronotum, which is straight in P. (A.) cloueti ( Fig. 54 View Figs 49–54. 49, 51, 53 ), but convex in P. (A.) lackneri sp. nov. ( Figs 26, 27 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 ); pronotum is as wide as elytra at humeri in P. (A.) cloueti ( Fig. 30 View Figs 30–32 ), but distinctly wider in P. (A.) lackneri sp. nov. ( Figs 26, 27 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 ); both species further differ also in the length of terminal antennomeres ( Figs 14, 15 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 vs. 13), more outstanding difference between the two kinds of punctation and longer setae on elytra in P. (A.) lackneri sp. nov. ( Figs 33, 34 View Figs 33–40. 33, 35, 37, 39 vs. 37, 38), and in the shape of the male genital segment ( Figs 9, 10 View Figs 9–12 vs. 12).

Philomessor (Attumbrinus) lackneri sp. nov. is most similar to P. (A.) bolivari Jeannel, 1936 , from which it differs in the narrower shape of body ( Figs 26, 27 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 vs. 28, 29) and the pubescence of metatibiae ( Figs 49 View Figs 49–54. 49, 51, 53 vs. 51), in males in its straight metatibiae ( Figs 26 View Figs 26–29. 26, 28 vs. 28), the shape of aedeagus and the length of parameres ( Figs 1 View Figs 1–8. 1, 3 vs. 3), the shape of genital segment ( Figs 9, 10 View Figs 9–12 vs. 11) and the emargination of the outer margin of the sternum VIII ( Figs 6 View Figs 1–8. 1, 3 vs. 8); in females in dilated protarsi ( Figs 43 View Figs 41–48. 41 vs. 47), in the shape of terga IX and X ( Figs 17 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 vs. 19), and in the shape of spiculum ventrale on the sternum VIII ( Figs 20 View Figs 13–20. 13, 14 vs. 18). Diagnostic key to all four species of the subgenus Attumbrinus is given above.

Etymology. Dedicated to the renowned specialist on the family Histeridae and one of the collectors of the new species, Tomáš Lackner (Košice, Slovakia).

Collecting circumstances. All specimens of the new species were collected in the ant nest of the genus Messor Forel, 1890 ( Hymenoptera : Formicidae ). The specimens from Oukaïmeden, collected by Peter Koniar and Martin Švarc were found in the nests of Messor abdelazizi Santschi, 1921 on pastures ( Figs 55, 57 View Figs 55–58. 55 ) at altitude 1870–2357 m a.s.l. Specimens from Tizi-n-Tretten near Ifrane were found in the nest of Messor sp. under a big stone on a pasture at the forest border at 1900 m a.s.l. Detailed data on the collection of the single female from the locality Ito are unknown.

Philomessor (Attumbrinus) lackneri sp. nov. seems to be sympatric and syntopic with P. (A.) bolivari Jeannel, 1936 ; both species were found together in the same ant nests on two localities (Oukaïmeden and Tizi-n-Tretten near Ifrane) (see Fig. 59 View Fig ).

Distribution. Morocco: Oukaïmeden in the High Atlas Mts.; Ito near Azrou, Tizi-n-Tretten near Ifrane, both localities in the Middle Atlas Mts. ( Fig. 59 View Fig ).

NMPC

National Museum Prague

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Leiodidae

Genus

Philomessor

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF