Platecarpus undetermined
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2007.00280.x |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3D0E87BE-FFA0-E629-DFC2-D87ADF55FCBE |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Platecarpus undetermined |
status |
|
NMC 40914 PLATECARPUS SP. (RUSSELLOSAURINA)
The specimen as illustrated ( Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) is a medial view of the left maxilla at about the midpoint of that element. Four tooth positions are shown, one of which, tooth position number three (III), has already shed the previous tooth generation, and has an incipient replacement tooth ( Fig. 2A, B View Figure 2 ) identified as III-1 at the anterolabial margin of the alveolus; there are three other replacement teeth, not in the alveolus, but identified here as part of that tooth position’s replacement series. Each of those crowns, III-2, III-3, III-4, is successively smaller than III-1 and aligned posterolingual to the third tooth position.
The remaining tooth positions, identified as I, II and IV, still have mature teeth anchored within the alveolus (crowns are all broken away), and all possess small resorption pits with replacement crowns (I-1, II- 1, IV-1) in the pits, but ‘tipped’ over and pointing posteriorly with the exception of I-2. Of importance to note in relation to the direction in which the tooth tips are pointing is that there is no such uniformity to the tooth tip direction of other replacement teeth associated with the replacement series for a tooth position. For example, for tooth position III: III-1 is vertical, III- 2 is horizontal and posteriorly directed, III-3 is horizontal and anteriorly directed, and III-4 is horizontal and anterolaterally directed. Similarly chaotic directions of preservation exist for all other tooth crown tips preserved along the dental groove of this specimen.
There are several important characteristics of mosasaur tooth development typified by NMC 40914 and worthy of repetition here: (1) tooth crowns develop apex to base and appear to include both enamel and dentine tissues in even the smallest crown tip (nonhistological observation); (2) multiple replacement teeth are continuously in position, within the dental lamina and along the dental groove, and for any one tooth position; (3) cement and other tissues of attachment are not present on any of the small tooth crowns in NMC 40914, including III-1 which is already vertical within the alveolus of tooth position III (therefore, cement and attachment tissues are late-stage features in the ontogeny of a replacement tooth); (4) there is no evidence to suggest that the tooth crowns develop in a recumbent position; rather, the tooth crown positions as preserved are a random effect of taphonomy; (5) in life, the dental laminae appear to have been continuous along the length of the dental groove in all TBEs [not discontinous as in crocodilians and located at the bottom of the alveolus ( Edmund, 1960)]; the presence of teeth along the dental groove is one line of evidence while the second is the posterolingual and exposed position of the resorption pit. If the dental lamina was discontinous and positioned within the socket, then resorption would be expected to be initiated at the tooth base, and not at the level of the gumline ( Figs 1–5 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 View Figure 5 ) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.