Platycotylus merkli, Yoshida 1 & Ando 2, 2021

Yoshida 1, Takahiro & Ando 2, Kiyoshi, 2021, Discovery of the genus Platycotylus Olliff, 1883 (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) in Japan: Description of a new and remarkable species, ZooKeys 1076, pp. 125-133 : 125

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1076.75846

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B653A0D3-C62F-4A17-813E-022EC2C2B5FE

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/324CF110-BE9C-400A-B497-AAA134298431

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:324CF110-BE9C-400A-B497-AAA134298431

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Platycotylus merkli
status

sp. nov.

Platycotylus merkli sp. nov.

Figures 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 , 3 Japanese name: Tsuji-hirata-hime-kokunusutomodoki View Figure 3

Type specimen.

Holotype: ♂, Japan, Kagoshima Prefecture, Toshima Village, Tokara Islands, Tokara-Nakanoshima Island, Nanatsuyama, 7.VII.2019, leg. Naomichi Tsuji, "under permission" (EUMJ).

Differential diagnosis.

According to Merkl (1992), the epistome structures of males are important diagnostic characteristics for Platycotylus species. All known Platycotylus males present a pair of short tubercles at the middle of the epistome, except for Platycotylus palmi Ferrer, 1998 (absent; see Ferrer 1998). Therefore, aside from species of which males have not been examined [ Platycotylus parvicollis (Pic, 1923) and Platycotylus tenuicollis (Fairmaire, 1893)], this new species can be distinguished from all other males of congeneric species by its long and asymmetrical epistomal horn.

The new species is most similar to P. parvicollis , of which a male has not yet been examined. It can be distinguished by the simple sparse punctation on the pronotum (laterally rugulose in P. parvicollis ; see Merkl 1992) and by elytra that are scarcely striate, with elytral intervals that are neither convex nor carinate (striate in the original description of P. parvicollis ; Pic 1923). Additionally, the smaller eyes and acutely produced temples of the new species differ from those of P. parvicollis .

In addition, the umbilical tubercle on the center of mentum may be one remarkable characteristic of this new species. At least, there is no such tubercle on the mentum of P. nitidulus , which has a small fovea in the middle.

Description.

Body length: 3.40 mm. Male. Elongate and flattened, shiny; dark reddish brown, head and pronotum blackish brown, elytra darkened on sutural and lateral parts.

Head obtrapezoidal, weakly convex, without frontogenal and frontoclypeal sutures; punctures coarse and dense, partly piligerous; epistome with a large asymmetrical horn in middle, distinctly emarginate on both sides of the horn, which is distinctly curved to the left and acute at its apex, with a long yellow seta arising from each emarginated anterior margin, covered with punctures; genae convex, roundly produced laterad; frons broadened, weakly convex, slightly sloping forwards, 3.83 times as wide as width of eye in lateral view; eyes entirely lateral, strongly convex laterad, without inner ocular sulci; temples slender, acutely produced laterad, setiferous and finely punctate. Antennae slender, surpassing base of elytra, almost filiform though 7th antennomere dilated apicad and 8th to 10th ones dilated and nearly as long as wide; 11th antennomere elongate. Ultimate maxillary palpomeres fusiform. Mentum transversely quadrate, weakly convex, irregularly depressed at sides, with an umbilical tubercle at middle. Submentum flat, subquadrate, strongly emarginate at sides. Gula narrow, linguiform, unevenly flat and smooth.

Pronotum obtrapezoidal, widest at apical fifth and 1.30 times as wide as long; disc slightly convex, densely punctate, punctures piligerous laterally, nearly as large as and slightly sparser than on head; anterior margin subtruncate, unbeaded; anterior corners with an acutely pointed process; lateral margins slightly rounded and evenly convergent posteriad, almost invisible in dorsal view, roundly and weakly edged at apical fifth and basal fifth, slightly sinuate before base, very finely beaded; posterior corners with processes smaller than those on anterior corners and acutely pointed laterad; basal margin weakly rounded, moderately beaded. Scutellar shield transverse, 1.67 times as wide as long, surface flat and smooth.

Elytra elongate, subparallel-sided, widest at basal sixth and 2.14 times as long as their combined width, subvertical between 7th intervals and lateral margins; surface scarcely striate, with rows of punctures larger than on pronotum; intervals almost flat and impunctate; epipleura irregularly rugulose.

Prothoracic hypomera weakly depressed, with large and coarse piligerous punctures. Prosternum weakly convex, distinctly sulcate along apical bead, sparsely punctate in middle and moderately so laterally; prosternal process trapezoidal, depressed, coarsely punctate. Mesoventrite weakly convex, with large and sparse piligerous punctures. Metaventrite weakly convex, sparsely and evenly punctate though becoming denser and piligerous in each lateral fourth. Abdomen (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ) with punctures piligerous, fine and dense; lateral margins of 3rd and 4th ventrites weakly and roundly produced in each apical half; 5th ventrite evenly rounded at posterior margin.

Abdominal sternites VIII and IX (Fig. 2B, C View Figure 2 ); sternite VIII thin, with short setae along posterior margin; sternite IX with a pair of horizontally elongate sclerites, with an elongate protrusion on the apical third of each sclerite that is slightly curved inwards. Aedeagus (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ) lanceolate, very short, 0.11 times as long as elytra, slightly twisted towards left side of body, obsoletely margined between basale and apicale; basale 1.07 times as long as apicale; apicale rounded at apex.

Legs robust. Femora strongly dilated towards middle or distally, sparse with setiferous punctures. Tibiae short and slender; protibiae with two tibial spurs, one of which is very large and robust, curved posteriorly.

Female. Unknown.

Etymology.

The new species is dedicated to the late Dr Ottó Merkl, who made a significant contribution to the taxonomy of Tenebrionidae .

Distribution.

Japan: Tokara Islands (Nakanoshima Island).

Biological notes.

The holotype was collected by beating the dead branches of an unidentified living tree.

Key to species of the genus Platycotylus (after Merkl 1992 and Schawaller 2014)

1 Pronotal surface between punctures and elytral intervals shagreened (micro-reticulated) P. ferrugineus (Kaszab, 1939)
- Pronotal surface and elytral intervals smooth and shiny 2
2 Antennomere 11 elongate, at least 3 times longer than wide, pronotum flat P. tenuicornis (Fairmaire, 1893)
- Antennomere 11 only 2 times longer than wide, pronotum convex 3
3 Pronotum more transverse, with distinctly prominent anterolateral corners P. nitidulus (MacLeay, 1872)
- Pronotum less transverse, subquadrate or trapezoidal, with short anterolateral corners 4
4 Pronotum longer, trapezoidal, elytral interval 7 convex P. palmi (Ferrer, 1998)
- Pronotum subquadrate or obtrapezoidal, elytral interval 7 keeled 5
5 Eyes moderate in size, temple not produced, pronotum laterally with rugulose punctation, elytra striate P. parvicollis (Pic, 1923)
- Eyes smaller, temple acutely produced, pronotum laterally with simple sparse punctation, elytra scarcely striate P. merkli sp. nov.

Abdominal pits and male genital morphology

Matthews and Bouchard (2008) regarded the abdominal pits of the palorine male and the inverted aedeagus as two autapomorphies of Palorini . However, the abdominal pits were absent on the males of Platycotylus examined by Masumoto and Grimm (2004). The male of P. merkli sp. nov. also does not possess these pits, indicating that they are lacking in the genus Platycotylus .

The male genital structures of Platycotylus have been poorly studied only in two species: P. palmi by Ferrer (1988) and P. nitidulus , with a simple illustration by Matthews and Bouchard (2005). The shapes of the aedeagi of these species are similar to each other and inverted, although the orientation of the aedeagus of P. palmi has yet to be examined. Nevertheless, the shape of the aedeagus of P. merkli sp. nov. is lanceolate, twisted in the middle, and with the basale slightly longer than the apicale (Fig. 3 View Figure 3 ). Thus, the genital morphology of P. merkli sp. nov. is substantially different from that of its congeners, which highlights the systematic peculiarity of this new species.

A similar pattern of variation in male genital morphology is shown in a lineage of Erotylidae ( Cucujoidea ), which is mainly found on the male cones of cycad plants and contains three genera: Cycadophila Xu, Tang & Skelley, 2015, Pharaxonotha Reitter, 1875, and Ceratophila Tang, Skelley & Pérez-Farrera, 2018. Males of Cycadophila possess an aedeagus that is twisted towards the left side, whereas the other genera possess inverted male genitalia ( Xu et al. 2015; Tang et al. 2020). Tang et al. (2020) suggested that these shapes and orientations of the genitalia may be related to the mating position (side-to-side or end-to-end) as an adaptation to mating in the tight spaces of cycad cones. These authors also indicated that these morphological adaptations had evolved independently in each genus. The twisted aedeagus of the new species described here, as well as the inverted aedeagus of the tribe in general, may be associated with the habitat of the insect, i.e., under the hardly loosened bark of dead branches. Further studies on these habitats, as well as on the mating behavior and genital morphology of Palorini , are required.